Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW,volume 1))

  • 1728 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we develop a prototype bottom-up macroeconomic (BAM) model,40 which epitomizes the key features at the root of a series of computational investigations of macroeconomic processes conceived as complex adaptive systems (CATS), as recently performed by our research group. Other exemplifications of the CATS approach can be found in (2005), (2007) and (2007).

The classical theorists resemble Euclidean geometers in a non-Euclidean world who, discovering that in experience straight lines apparently parallel often meet, rebuke the lines for not keeping straight—as the only remedy for the unfortunate collisions which are occurring. Yet, in truth, there is no remedy except to thro over the axiom of parallels and to work out a non-Euclidean geometry. John M. Keynes The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, p. 16

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A streamlined version of the present model and a succinct discussion of its features can be found in Delli Gatti et al. (2008).

  2. 2.

    Several interpretations of the acronym KISS circulate, most of them overlapping. The one we prefer is keep it simple, stupid!

  3. 3.

    Behavioral rules represent by construction the process of adaptation of the agent’s actions to changes of the environment. In a behavioral setting therefore expectations formation can be modeled quite straightforwardly as an adaptive scheme: Firms form expectations on future demand only on the basis of the past history of production (which is demand constrained). This adaptive mechanism is inefficient from a rational expectations (RE) viewpoint. In fact, if agents cast adaptive expectations, sooner or later they will incur in systematic errors. In a RE setting, on the contrary, agents are rational, i.e. they are able to elicit all the necessary information — not only the past history of the variable in question — and process it in such a way as to make only random errors which cancel out in the aggregate. Notice, however, that from the statistical point of view REs are conditional expectations of the system’s data generating process (DGP). As such they are inherently liable to errors. In any given situation, according to the RE theory agents endowed with rational expectations should not make mistakes on average, but in practice they do. In order for agents to assess whether their specification of the DGP’s conditional mean is right or not, the situation must be repeated over time in such a way as to allow agents to learn and update their expectation formation with the help of an “error correction” procedure. At the same time, however, the DGP is likely to change as well, frustrating agents’ efforts to be “rational”.

  4. 4.

    In simulations we set the duration of contracts θ to 8 periods, while the minimum wage is revised every 4 periods. If we assume that one simulation period corresponds to a quarter, this means that labour contracts last two years, while the minimum wage is revised annually.

  5. 5.

    In a monopolistic competition setting characterized by Bertrand competition, this would correspond to a Symmetric Bertrand-Nash Equilibrium.

  6. 6.

    For simplicity, we assume that firms do not attempt to raise funds by issuing new equities. This admittedly extreme assumption can be grounded in asymmetric information on the stock market. The manager of the equity issuing firm, in fact, can assess the fundamental value of the firm much better than the potential shareholder and this asymmetric information scenario is common knowledge. In this setting equity rationing can occur, i.e. the firm may eventually rule out the issuing of new equities because the shareholders would purchase the new shares only at too low a price.

  7. 7.

    To compute the average size of the incumbent firms we use the truncated mean at 10%. This means the lower and upper 5% of the firms’ population are ruled out.

  8. 8.

    Examples of degenerate dynamics we want to avoid are extremely volatile aggregate GDP dynamics, average rates of bankruptcy and unemployment over 50%, and average rates of annualized inflation outside the ±10000% range.

  9. 9.

    GB2, D and SM can be derived as the solution of a differential-equation Pearson system, with D and SM being three-parameter specializations of the GB2 distribution. The κ-Generalized distribution, on its part, is obtained from the entropy constrained maximization of a deformed exponential function.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delli Gatti, D., Desiderio, S., Gaffeo, E., Cirillo, P., Gallegati, M. (2011). The BAM Model at Work. In: Macroeconomics from the Bottom-up. New Economic Windows, vol 1. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1971-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics