Skip to main content

Abstract

Opioid agents are essential for achieving the suppression of reflex responses to noxious surgical and anaesthetic stimulations, one of the major objectives of anaesthesia. They interfere with the transmission of nociceptive impulses at the spinal cord and the brain, thereby reducing the resulting reflex responses to pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausems ME, Vuyk J, Hug CC et al (1988) Comparison of a computer assisted infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of alfentanil as a supplement to nitrous oxide for lower abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 88:851–861

    Google Scholar 

  2. White PF (1989) Clinical uses of intravenous anesthetic and analgesic infusions. Anesth Analg 68:161–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shafer SL, Varvel JR (1991) Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology 74:53–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes MS, Glass PSA, Jacobs JR (1992) Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology 76:334–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gepts E, Shafer SL, Camu F et al (1995) Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil. Anesthesiology 83:1194–1204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vuyck J, Lim T, Engbers F et al (1993) Pharmacodynamics of alfentanil as a supplement to propofol and nitrous oxide for lower abdominal surgery in female patients. Anesthesiology 78:1036–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howie MB, McSweeny TD, Lingam RP et al (1985) A comparison of fentanyl-O2 and sufentanil-02 for cardiac anesthesia. Anesth Analg 64:877–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Albanese J, Durbee O, Viviand X et al (1993) Sufentanil increases intracranial pressure in patients with head trauma. Anesthesiology 79:493–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stephan H, Gröger P, Weyland A et al (1991) Einfluss von Sufentanil auf hirndurchblutung, hirnstoffwechsel und die CO2-reaktivität der menschlichen himgefässe. Anaesthesist 40: 153–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. White PF, Coe V, Shafer A et al (1986) Comparison of alfentanil with fentanyl for outpatient anesthesia. Anesthesiology 64:99–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Camu, F., Lauwers, M.H., Van Lersberghe, C. (1997). Pharmacological Basics of Clinical Anaesthesia: Analgesia. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2296-6_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2296-6_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75032-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2296-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics