Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Disorders: Surgical Approach

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 1921 Accesses

Abstract

The pelvic floor is a complex, three-dimensional (3D) mechanical apparatus that has been artificially divided in three different regions: anterior, middle, and posterior compartments. However, urinary (urinary incontinence, voiding dysfuntion, cystocele), genital (uterine prolapse, vaginal vault prolapse, enterocele), and anorectal abnormalities (fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation, rectocele, intussusception, dyssynergia) are frequently associated in women with pelvic floor dysfunction [1]. Although patients may present with symptoms that involve only one compartment, 95% of patients have abnormalities in all three compartments [2]. As a consequence, the specialist (urologist, gynecologist, gastroenterologist, and colorectal surgeon) approaching the pelvic floor should not have vertical vision confined to their area of interest, but a transverse, multicompartmental vision, always taking into consideration that pelvic floor disorders rarely occur in isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeLancey JO (2005) The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1488–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K et al (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz AP et al (2011) State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:381–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:80–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz HP (2010) Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:321–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2005) Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz HP, Shek C, Clarke B (2005) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:580–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A et al (2009) High-resolution three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study. Int Urogynecol J 20: 1213–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Santoro GA, Fortling B (2007) The advantages of volume rendering in three-dimensional endosonography of the anorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 359–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Santoro G, Wieczorek AP, Bartram CI (2010) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Milan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Shobeiri SA et al (2011) Interobserver and interdisciplinary reproducibility of 3D endovaginal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz H, De Leon J, Shek K (2008) Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:676–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz H (2007) Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz HP, Wilson PD (1999) The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction. Int Urogynecol J 10:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Santoro GA (2012) Which method is best for imaging of anal sphincter defects? Dis Colon Rectum 55:625–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tunn R, Schaer G, Peschers U (2005) Update recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J 16:236–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz HP, Barry C, Lim YN, Rane A (2005) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of suburethral slings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wexner SD, Shawki S (2008) Surgical management of fecal incontinence. In: Stoker J, Taylor SA, DeLancey JOL (eds) Imaging pelvic floor disorders. Springer: Heidelberg, pp 245–264

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Starck M, Bohe M, Valentin L (2003) Results of endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter 2–7 days after primary repair of third-or fourth-degree obstetric sphincter tears. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:609–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Norderval S, Dehli T, Vonen B (2009) Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography: intraobserver and interobserver agreement using scoring systems for classification of anal sphincter defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:337–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q et al (2003) The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J (2001) Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:511–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Koelbl H, Bernaschek G, Wolf G (1988) A comparative study of perineal ultrasound scanning and urethrocystography in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 244:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steensma AB, Oom DMJ, Burger CW, Schouten RW (2010) Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctogaphy and 3D transperineal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis 12:533–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Perniola G, Shek C, Chong CCW et al (2008) Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:567–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV et al (2008) A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique (echodefecography) to assess obstructed defecation, a comparison with defecography. Surg Endosc 22:974–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Regadas FSP, Haas EM, Jorge JM et al (2011) Prospective multicenter trial comparing echodefecography with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunctions in patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 54: 86–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Murad-Regadas SM, Soares GS, Regadas FSP et al (2012) A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique for the assessment of perineal descent, compared with defaecography. Colorectal Dis 14:740–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuijpers HC, Bleijenberg G (1985) The spastic pelvic floor syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 28:669–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Groenendijk AG, Birnie E, de Blok S et al (2009) Clinical-decision taking in primary pelvic organ prolapse; the effects of diagnostic tests on treatment selection in comparison with a consensus meeting. Int Urogynecol J 20:711–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Broekhuis SR, Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC et al (2009) POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 20:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Pelvic Floor Unit, Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy

    Giulio A. Santoro

Authors
  1. Giulio A. Santoro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sthela Murad-Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luigi Causa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anders Mellgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio A. Santoro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy

    Achille Lucio Gaspari  & Pierpaolo Sileri  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santoro, G.A., Murad-Regadas, S., Causa, L., Mellgren, A. (2014). Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography. In: Gaspari, A.L., Sileri, P. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders: Surgical Approach. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5441-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5441-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5440-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5441-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation