Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Richtlijnontwikkeling en wetenschappelijk onderzoek

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handboek evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling

  • 2704 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  • Bos AB, Ballegooijen M van, et al. Endocervical status is not predictive of the incidence of cervical cancer in the years after negative smears. Am J Clin Path 2001;115:851–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles M, Mason J. How to develop cost-conscious guidelines. Health Technol Ass 2001;5:1–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Everdingen JJE van, Kleijnen J. Het gerandomiseerde onderzoek dateert van de jaren 50. Kaandorp CJE, Everdingen JJE van. Medische misvattingen. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleuren MAH, Haan M de, et al. Wordt de NHG-standaard (Dreigende) Miskraam door huisartsen gevolgd? Huisarts Wet 1993;36:370–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flikweert F, Wieringa-De Waard M, et al. NHG-standaard Miskraam (tweede herziening). Huisarts Wet 2004; 47:147–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoomans T, Severens JL, Evers SM, Ament AJ. Value for money in changing clinical practice: should decisions about guidelines and implementation strategies be made sequentially or simultaneously? Med Decis Making 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):207–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomised efficacy trials. JAMA 1998:279;281–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, Vijgen SM, Aarnoudse JG, Bekedam DJ, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):979–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil B. Hidden barriers to improvement in the quality of care. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1612–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mevius L. HYPITAT-trial van invloed op beleid en gezondheid moeders. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2011;155:C1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Querido JD. Waarover NHG-standaarden? Zes jaar wikken en wegen door de NHG-Adviesraad Standaarden. Med Cont 1996;51:361–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA 2001;286:1461–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tasche MJA, Oosterberg EH, et al. Inventarisatie van lacunes in huisartsgeneeskundige kennis. Zeventig standaarden doorgelicht. Huisarts Wet 2001;44:91–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuuk K van der, Koopmans CM, Groen H, Mol BW, Pampus MG van; HYPITAT study group. Impact of the HYPITAT trial on doctors’ behaviour and prevalence of eclampsia in the Netherlands. BJOG. 2011;Dec;118(13):1658–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa-De Waard M. Afwachten of curetteren? Effectiviteit van de behandeling en kwaliteit van leven bij vrouwen met een miskraam. Huisarts Wet 2003;6:299–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. opleiding tot gynaecoloog, AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    M.M.J. Wiegerinck

  2. klinische epidemiologie, AMC, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    B.W. Mol

  3. ZonMW, Den Haag, Netherlands

    H.J. Smid

Authors
  1. M.M.J. Wiegerinck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B.W. Mol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H.J. Smid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Overveen, The Netherlands

    J.J.E. van Everdingen

  2. Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg, Den Haag, The Netherlands

    D.H.H. Dreesens

  3. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    J.S. Burgers

  4. Acute Stoornissen, PB01-542, Academisch Psychiatrisch Centrum AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    J.A. Swinkels

  5. Professionele Kwaliteit, Orde van Medisch Specialisten, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    T.A. van Barneveld

  6. Dept. General Practice, CAPHRI, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    T. van der Weijden

Copyright information

© 2014 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiegerinck, M., Mol, B., Smid, H. (2014). Richtlijnontwikkeling en wetenschappelijk onderzoek. In: van Everdingen, J., Dreesens, D., Burgers, J., Swinkels, J., van Barneveld, T., van der Weijden, T. (eds) Handboek evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0267-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0267-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0266-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-368-0267-3

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation