Skip to main content

Simulation of Fine-Scale Heterogeneity of Meandering River Aquifer Analogues: Comparing Different Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
geoENV VII – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 16))

Abstract

We compare different approaches to fine scale simulation of aquifer heterogeneity of meandering river depositional elements, based on the study of a 3-D quarry exposure of historical point bar-channel sediments of the Lambro River (Po plain, Northern Italy). The starting point is a sedimentological and hydrostratigraphic hierarchic model obtained after mapping of five quarry faces with centimeter-scale detail. The vertical facies maps show the shape and size of two superimposed composite bars, of their component unit bars and channel fills and the distribution of the individual facies within them. Textural and poro-perm analyses allowed the definition of the properties of four basic hydrofacies (Open Framework Gravels, Gravelly Sands and Sandy Gravels, Clean Sands, Sandy Silts and Clays), with permeability contrasts by at least one order of magnitude \((1{0}^{-9} < \mathrm{K} < 1{0}^{-1})\). The correlation of hydrofacies has been quantified after discretization of the maps with square cells (side 0.05 m), by both transition-probability geostatistics and variographic analysis, to support 3-D pixel-oriented simulation of the volume. We found a high level of correspondence between the semivariogram ranges and the experimental transition probabilities computed on the entire dataset. Several realizations of 3-D conditioned simulations, that honour the vertical facies maps, were computed using Sequential Indicator Simulation (SIS) and T-Progs (transition-probability geostatistics software). Both methods yield more realistic results if the highest rank depositional elements are simulated separately than if the sedimentary volume is simulated on the whole. Image analyses on random sections through selected realizations shows that, in this specific case, SIS yields the most realistic simulations. However, both techniques are not capable of accounting for trends of depositional features that determine a non-stationary behaviour at the facies scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bersezio R, Giudici M, Mele M (2007) Combining sedimentological and geophysical data for high resolution 3-d mapping of fluvial architectural elements in the Quaternary Po plain (Italy). Sediment Geol 202:230–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierkens MFP, Weerts HJT (1994) Block hydraulic conductivity of cross-bedded fluvial sediments. Water Resour Res 30:2665–2678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleines P, Deraisme J, Geffroy F, Perseval S, Rambert F, Renard D, Touffait Y (2000) Isatis Software Manual. Geovariances, Avon Cedex

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge JS, Lunt IA (2006) Depositional models of braided rivers. In: Sambrook Smith GS et al. (eds) Braided rivers, Spec Publ Int Assoc Sedimentol 36:11–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabello P, Cuevas JL, Ramos E (2007) 3D modelling of grain size distribution in quaternay in deltaic plain deposits (Llobregat Delta, NE Spain). Geologica Acta 5:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle SF (1999) T-PROGS: Transition Probability Geostatistical Software version 2.1. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle SF, Fogg GE (1996) Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics. Math Geol 28:453–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carle SF, Labolle EM, Weissmann GS, Van Brocklin D, Fogg GE (1998) Conditional simulation of hydrofacies architecture: a transition probability/Markov approach. In: Fraser GS, Davis JM (eds) Hydrogeologic models of sedimentary aquifers. SEPM Special Publication, Concepts in Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, pp. 147–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Ritzi RW Jr, Huang C, Rubin Y, Dominic DF (2004) Transport in heterogeneous sediments with multimodal conductivity and hierarchical organization across scales. J Hydrol 294:68–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Marsily G, Delay F, Gonçalvès PRJ, Teles V, Violette S (2005) Dealing with spatial heterogeneity. Hydrogeol J 13:161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) GSLIB—Geostatistical Software Library and Users Guide: New York, Oxford University Press, 340 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Falivene O, Cabrera L, Muñoz JA, Arbués P, Fernández O, Sáez A (2007) Statistical grid-based facies reconstruction and modelling for sedimentary bodies. Alluvial-palustrine and turbiditic examples. Geol Acta 5:199–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Felletti F, Bersezio R, Giudici M (2006) Geostatistical simulation and numerical upscaling to model groundwater flow in a sandy-gravel, braided river aquifer analogue. J Sediment Res 76 (11):1215–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogg GE, Noyes CD, Carle SF (1998) Geologically-based model of heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity in an alluvial setting. J Hydrogeol 6:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NM (1995) Characterization of alluvial hydrostratigraphy with indicator variograms. Water Resour Res 31:3217–3227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NM, Dreiss SJ (1989) Hydrostratigraphic interpretation using indicator geostatistics. Water Resour Res 25:2501–2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan DW, Pryor WA (1992) Hierarchical levels of heterogeneity in a Mississippi River meander belt and application to reservoir systems. AAPG Bull 76:1601–1624

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1993) Stochastic Imaging of the Wilmington Clastic Sequence. SPE paper 19857. Society of Petroleum Engineers Formation Evaluation March, pp. 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Gundeso R, Gringarten E, Yao T (1998) Stochastic modelling of a fluvial reservoir: a comparative review of algorithms. J Petroleum Sci Eng 21:95–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostic B, Aigner T (2007) Sedimentary architecture and 3-D ground penetrating radar analysis of gravelly meandering river deposits (Neckar valley, SW Germany). Sedimentology 54:789–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Srinisivan S, Wong DW (2002) Geological characterization of naturally fractured reservoir using multiple point geostatistics. Society of Petroleum Engineers 75246, SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt IA, Bridge JS, Tye RS (2004) Development of a 3-D depositional model of braided river gravels and sands to improve aquifer characterization. In Aquifer Characterization, Bridge JS, Hyndman D (eds) Spec Publ SEPM Soc Sediment Geol 80:139–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzi RW (2000) Behavior of indicator variogram and transition probabilities in relation to the variance in lengths of hydrofacies. Water Resour Res 36:3375–3381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzi RW, Dai Z, Dominic DF (2004) Spatial correlation of permeability in cross-stratified sediment with hierarchical architecture. Water Resour Res 40, w03513, doi:10.1029/2003WR002420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin Y, Journel AG (1991) Simulation of non-Gaussian space random functions for modeling transport in groundwater. Water Resour Res 27:1711–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin Y, Lunt IA, Bridge JS (2006) Spatial variability in river sediments and its link with river channel geometry. Water Resour Res 42, w06d16, doi:10.1029/2005wr004853

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert D, Jensen JL (1999) Using sequential indicator simulation as a tool in reservoir description: issues and uncertainties. Math Geol 31:527–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet ML, Blewden CJ, Carter AM, Mills CA (1996) Modeling heterogeneity in a low permeability gas reservoir using geostatistical techniques, Hyde Field. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 80:1719–1735

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissmann GS, Fogg GE (1999) Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework. J Hydrol 226:48–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissmann GS, Carle SF, Fogg GE (1999) Three-dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics. Water Resour Res 35:1761–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappa G, Bersezio R, Felletti F, Giudici M (2006) Modeling aquifer heterogeneity at the facies scale in gravel-sand braided stream deposits. J Hydrol 325:134–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana dell’Arciprete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

dell’Arciprete, D., Felletti, F., Bersezio, R. (2010). Simulation of Fine-Scale Heterogeneity of Meandering River Aquifer Analogues: Comparing Different Approaches. In: Atkinson, P., Lloyd, C. (eds) geoENV VII – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2322-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics