Skip to main content

Abstract

Progressing towards “Sustainable Development” as a national strategy raises important challenges to public administration and performance evaluation in government. After representing the research background, this chapter sets three problems faced by the current performance evaluation system named “strategic gaps” and then states that the study objective is to establish “Sustainability Performance Evaluation System” in government. In order to build up this new model, three methods are combined into a three-dimensional conceptual framework, and sustainability balanced scorecard is accepted as the basic tool to refine the new system and develop a set of indicators. Finally, the structure of this book will be introduced to facilitate readers to understand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This research is funded by China Scholarship Council (CSC), which is supported by the government of P. R. China.

References

  • Committee of the Communist Party of China (CCPC). (2005). The proposal of 11th five-year plan for national economy and social development. Retrieved August 2007, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2005-10/18/content_3640318.htm.

  • Griffiths, J. (2003). Balanced scorecard use in New Zealand government departments and crown entities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(4), 70–79, December 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Audit (INTOSAI WGEA). (2004). Sustainable development: The role of Supreme Audit Institutions. Retrieved April 2009, form INTOSAI website: http://www.environmental-auditing.org

  • Mohamed, N. (2000). Monitoring and evaluation: Key principles for LA21 planning. Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustainable Development Indicators, ACCA21 and Harbin Municipality. China: Heilongjiang People Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldan, B. (1997). Chapter 4: National level indicators. In B. Moldan, S. Billharz, & R. Matravers (Eds.), Sustainability indicators: Report of the project on indicators of sustainable development (SCOPE58). Chichester and New York: John Wiley. Retrieved August 2007, from Scientific Committee On Problems of Environment (SCOPE) website: http://www.icsu-scope.org/downloadpubs/scope58/ch04-introd.htm

  • Pintér, L., Hardi, P., & Bartelmus, P. (2005). Sustainable development indicators: Proposals for the way forward. Discussion Paper Prepared under a Consulting Agreement on behalf of the UN Division for Sustainable Development, IISD. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2005/measure_indicators_sd_way_forward.pdf.

  • Swanson, D., Pintér, L., Bregha, F., Volkery, A., & Jacob, K. (2004). National strategies for sustainable development: Challenges, approaches and innovations in strategic and co-ordinated action. Retrieved August 2007, from IISD website: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2004/measure_nat_strategies_sd.pdf.

  • UN (1992). Agenda 21. Retrieved August 2007, from United Nations website: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21chapter40.htm.

  • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2002). Guidance in preparing a national sustainable development strategy: Managing sustainable development in the new millenium. Outcome of the International Forum on National Sustainable Development Strategy, Accra, Ghana, 7–9 November 2001, submitted as Background Paper No. 13 for the World Summit on Sustainable Development Second preparatory session 28 January–8 February 2002. Retrieved August 2007, from United Nations website: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/nsds_guidance.pdf.

  • UN Division for Sustainable Development (UNDSD). (2008). National sustainable development strategies: The global picture (last updated 2008). Retrieved March 2009, from United Nations website: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/nsds/nsds_map2008.pdf

  • Vergez, C., & Caddy, J. (2001). Citizens as partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. OECD Online Bookshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N. (2005). Foreword. In K. A. Day (Ed.), China’s environment and the challenge of sustainable development. An East Gate Book, Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nan Chai .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chai, N. (2009). Introduction. In: Sustainability Performance Evaluation System in Government. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3012-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics