Skip to main content

Response Surface Sampling of Remotely Sensed Imagery for Precision Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Proximal Soil Sensing

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

  • 2436 Accesses

Abstract

Estimating biophysical characteristics of land surfaces using imagery or spatially contiguous datasets derived from proximal sensors requires developing statistically robust predictive models between the spatial data and ground features. These spatial datasets can contain thousands to millions of points or pixels, so determining the number and location of ground samples to calibrate models is critical. Zoning and co-kriging approaches have been used to identify sampling locations, but they suffer from either ambiguous location identification or the need for 60 or more ground points to produce robust models. In this study, the software ‘ECe Sampling, Assessment, and Prediction’ (ESAP) was used to select sampling locations from high-resolution (4 m) imagery of a barley crop to develop a predictive regression model for biomass. A normalised difference vegetation index was derived from imagery of an 80 ha field near Rupanyup, Victoria, Australia in 2006. The ESAP software was originally developed to calibrate apparent soil electrical conductivity data to model soil salinity based on response surface theory, but any geo-located spatial dataset can be input. Results showed that the 12 ESAP-selected points produced a statistically significant regression model unbiased by spatial autocorrelation and was better able to predict biomass than models derived from 12 random points and a pooled model derived from 24 sample locations. The correlations between the selected pixels in the imagery and biomass (r 2 = 0.38) were not as high as from ground spectral data (r 2 = 0.79) collected coincident with biomass sampling, possibly due to misalignment between the imagery and ground data. Digital output from this approach could be used to map soil or plant properties, schedule variable rate applications of chemicals, or be used as inputs to soil and crop simulation models for more accurate site-specific modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Fitzgerald GJ, Lesch SM, Barnes EM, Luckett WJ (2006) Directed sampling using remote sensing with a response surface sampling design for site-specific agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 53:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch SM, Strauss DJ, Rhoades JD (1995a) Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques: 1. Statistical prediction models: A comparison of multiple linear regression and co-kriging. Water Resour Res 31:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch SM, Strauss DJ, Rhoades JD (1995b) Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques: 2. An efficient spatial sampling algorithm suitable for multiple linear regression model identification and estimation. Water Resour Res 31:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch SM, Rhoades JD, Corwin DL (2000) The ESAP-95 version 2.01R User Manual and Tutorial Guide. Research Report No. 146. USDA-ARS. In: George E. Brown, Jr, (ed) Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA, http://www.ussl.ars.usda.gov/lcrsan/esap95.pdf. Accessed 9 Jul 2009

  • Lesch SM (2005) Sensor-directed response surface sampling designs for characterizing spatial variation in soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 46:153–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy S, Tarquis AM, Gaonac’h, H, Schertzer D (2008) Single and multiscale remote sensing techniques, multifractals and MODIS-derived vegetation and soil moisture. Vadose Zone J 7:533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, van der Meer F, Gorte B (2002) Spatial statistics for remote sensing. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Our Rural Landscape project, a Victorian government initiative, for financial support. Hard work and dedication from Russel Argall and other technical staff made this chapter possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G.J. Fitzgerald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitzgerald, G. (2010). Response Surface Sampling of Remotely Sensed Imagery for Precision Agriculture. In: Viscarra Rossel, R., McBratney, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Proximal Soil Sensing. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8859-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics