Skip to main content

Care and Loyalty in the Workplace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applying Care Ethics to Business

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 34))

Abstract

There is significant debate in business ethics regarding the place of loyalty and gratitude in business relations. While most accounts of loyalty—both of employers to employees and of employees to employers—suppose that duties of loyalty are ultimately grounded in contractual agreements, our view is that these relationships are also personal and develop elements of friendship that involve emotional bonds. Although relationships of employment begin as contractual and maintain that character as long as the contract endures, such relations are interpersonal as well as contractual, and for this dimension of the relationship, the ethics of care can give important guidance in understanding the moral nature of the relationship and obligations that flow from it. Our aim in this chapter is to argue that the approach that care theorists take toward personal relationships—which involves emphasizing the importance of personal relationships, sustaining connections with others, and using highly contextual reasoning to make moral decisions—also applies to the personal relationships developed between employers and employees. On this view, it is virtuous to replicate relationships of care, empathy, and concern for others in the workplace, especially when employers and employees maintain more intimate and personal relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is hard to see how defining the necessary and sufficient conditions of loyalty could cover these various loyalties without emptying the concept of any force since not all expressions of loyalty are “good” or moral. For example, a loyal employee might fail to become a whistle-blower when confronted with damning evidence of corporate wrongdoing, or a loyal Nike or Gap customer might willfully refuse to acknowledge allegations of use of sweatshop labor out of loyalty to the brand.

  2. 2.

    Carol Gilligan’s early research suggests that men and women discuss morality using two different “voices:” the voice of justice and the voice of care. For Gilligan, loyalty would be an expression of care to particular individuals in concrete relationships. (See Carol Gilligan 1982.)

  3. 3.

    See especially Virginia Held, who argues that the concepts, metaphors, and images associated with the care involved in parenting/mothering best express the dynamics of the moral life. (Held 2006) Nel Noddings also argues that we each exist in a web of relationships, and that in these relationships of care, one should be both a care-er and a cared-for. We should seek to preserve and nurture the concrete and valuable relationships we have with specific persons. (See especially Chapters 2 and 3 of Noddings 1984.)

  4. 4.

    The obligations that flow from our caring relationships are described differently by care ethicists. For example, according to Gilligan, we should exercise special care for those we are concretely in relation to by attending to their particular needs, values, and desires. Eva Feder Kittay, on the other hand, argues that we have an obligation to exercise special care toward those particular persons with whom we have valuable close relationships, particularly where the relationship is one of “dependency” such as that of a child on a parent (Kittay 1998).

  5. 5.

    Keller argues that the only time loyalty is a duty is between children and their parents. Children should perform loyal actions, out of loyal feelings and motives. Keller (2007), 143.

  6. 6.

    In addition, Keller is right to say that not all forms of loyalty involve prioritizing another’s interests, and that this is neither sufficient nor necessary for loyalty to that entity. One may prioritize someone’s interest out of duty or obligation and not as an expression of loyalty, and conversely, loyalty can be expressed without prioritizing another’s interests.

  7. 7.

    In the preceding, we have used “employer” to refer ambiguously to the business in its role relative to the employee, in which the “employer” may be conceived of by the employee as being both the abstract legal entity of the corporation and the representatives of that abstract legal entity. Since we will now be discussing particular interpersonal relationships within business, we will avoid the ambiguous term “employer” in favor of speaking either of “corporation” or “management”. By “corporation” we will mean exclusively the abstract legal entity and by “management” we will mean exclusively the group of actual people who represent the corporation in their roles as managers, supervisors, and executives.

  8. 8.

    As stated in the Restatement (Third) of Agency, “Agency is the fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (a “principal”) manifests assent to another person (an “agent”) that the agent shall act on the principal’s behalf and subject to the principal’s control, and the agent manifests assent or otherwise consents so to act” (American Law Institute 2006). Having entered a relationship of special trust, in which the agent is taken as representative of the principal, there are special obligations to promote the ends of the principal.

  9. 9.

    See Slote (2007) Chapter 1.

  10. 10.

    For example, in a small, privately-owned, family-run business, there may be little sense in speaking of loyalty to the business separately from loyalty to the owner-manager, while in most U.S. businesses, loyalty to the corporation may be quite separable, and may indeed come into conflict with, loyalty to one’s co-workers or managers.

References

  • American Law Institute. 2006. Restatement (third) of agency. In the Restatement of the law: Third records, American Law Institute archives, ALI.04.003, Biddle Law Library, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. 1960. Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. 1983. Whistleblowing and professional responsibility. In Contemporary issues in business ethics, ed. J. DesJardins and J. McCall, 295–300. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, J.H. 1997. Loyalty: subversive doctrine? The Academy of Management Executive 11 (3): 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G.F. 2010. American business values: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corvino, J. 2002. Loyalty in business? Journal of Business Ethics 41: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duska, R.F. 1984. Whistleblowing and employee loyalty. In Contemporary issues in business ethics, ed. J. DesJardins and J. McCall, 142–147. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duska, R.F. 1992. Why be a loyal agent? A systemic ethical analysis. In Ethics and agency theory, ed. E. Freeman and N. Bowie, 143–168. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewin, R.E. 1993. Corporate loyalty: its objects and its grounds. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and moral development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D.W., and J.A. Thompson. 2007. Untangling employee loyalty: A psychological contract perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly 17: 297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E.M. 1994. The commons and the moral organization. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. (Trans. T.M. Knox) 1952[1820]. Hegel’s philosophy of right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. 2006. The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, S.W. 1992. The modern business corporation and an ethics of trust. Journal of Religious Ethics 20: 111–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, E.A. 2006. Exit and voice: organizational loyalty and dispute resolution strategies. Social Forces 84: 2313–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J.V. 1987. Ethical tension points in whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 6: 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. 2007. The limits of loyalty. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E.F. 1998. Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmer, RA. 1992. Whistleblowing and employee loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mane, Hajdin. 2005. Employee loyalty: an examination. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3): 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D. 2001. Loyalty in business: subversive doctrine or real need? Business Ethics Quarterly 11: 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, R.S. 1992. Owing loyalty to one’s employer. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randels, G.D. Jr. 2001. Loyalty, corporations, and community. Business Ethics Quarterly 11: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanas, J.M., and M. Velilla. 2003. Loyalty and trust as the ethical bases of organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 44: 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrag, B. 2001. The moral significance of employee loyalty. Business Ethics Quarterly 11: 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 1994. Rethinking life and death: the collapse of our traditional ethics. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. 2007. The ethics of care and empathy. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soles, D.E. 1993. Four concepts of loyalty. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 8: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 1998. The moral psychology of business: care and compassion in the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steib, J.A. 2006. Clearing up the egoist difficulty with loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 63: 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove, W., and M.S.R. Commers. 2004. Whistle blowing and rational loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varelius, J. 2009. Is whistle-blowing compatible with employee loyalty? Journal of Business Ethics 85: 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.H. 1994. Justice, impartiality, and reciprocity: A response to Edwin Hartman. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 287–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.H. 1999. Justice and trust. Journal of Business Ethics 21: 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A.C., R.E. Freeman, P.H. Werhane et al . 2010. Business ethics: A managerial approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, O. 1915. The devoted friend. In Novels and fairy tales of Oscar Wilde, ed. H.S. Nichols New York, NY: Little & Ives.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julinna Oxley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oxley, J., Wittkower, D. (2011). Care and Loyalty in the Workplace. In: Hamington, M., Sander-Staudt, M. (eds) Applying Care Ethics to Business. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9307-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics