Skip to main content

Gauging Causality in Multilevel Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multilevel Modeling of Social Problems
  • 1827 Accesses

Abstract

This book illustrates strategies for the development and testing of multilevel models bearing on social problems, all of which deal directly or indirectly on aspects of human development, measured by social and economic indicators. It confronts social problems by ideally following these five steps: analyze the roots of the social problem both theoretically and empirically; formulate a study design that captures the nuances of the problem; gather empirical data bearing on the social problem that enable the design to be operationalized by forming identifiable and repeatable measures; model the multilevel data using appropriate multilevel statistical methods to uncover potential causes and any bias to their effects; and use the results to sharpen theory and to formulate evidence-based policy recommendations for implementation and testing. Applying this process, the core chapters present multilevel models focusing on political extremism, global human development, violence against minorities, the substantive complexity of work, reform of urban schools, and problems of health care. The reader will be better able to conduct state-of-the-art studies on these and other topics by gaining an understanding of these chapters and by using the available data sets and analytic programs to replicate and advance the analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To avoid confusing the levels of causality with the levels of the variables in the multilevel models, I spell their levels of causality (i.e., zero, one, and two) whereas I designate the hierarchical levels of the multilevel models and their variables using numbers (i.e., level-1, level-2, and level-3).

  2. 2.

    Rubin ([1984] 2006, 27) has reprinted William Cochran’s reading list for Statistics 284, circa 1968. The books and studies on this list exemplify classic causality and robust dependence; they were a starting point for Rubin’s subsequent advancement of statistical theory and method.

  3. 3.

    Rubin ([1984] 2006, 7) gives this example of an observational study:

    An analysis of health records for samples of smokers and nonsmokers from the U.S. population is an observational study. The obvious problem created by observational studies is that there may exist systematic differences between the treatment groups besides treatment exposure, and so any observed differences between the groups (e.g., between smokers and nonsmokers) with respect to an outcome variable (e.g., incidence of lung cancer) might be due to confounding variables (e.g., age, genetic susceptibility to cancer) rather than to the treatments themselves. Consequently, a primary objective in the design and analysis of observational studies is to control, through sampling and statistical adjustment, the possible biasing effects of those confounding variables that can be measured: a primary objective in the evaluation of observational studies is to speculate about the remaining biasing effects of those confounding variables that cannot be measured.

  4. 4.

    Computer simulation studies find that variables that only affect treatment assignment but not the response (i.e., instrumental variables) are best not included as a covariate, but those variables that affect the response but not treatment assignment can be included. (Presentation to the Boston Chapter of the American Statistical Association by Til Stürmer, MD, MPH, May 4, 2010.)

  5. 5.

    See the data for 2009 and the time series in the Stephen Roth report (2010).

  6. 6.

    Heckman, Pearl, Robins, and Rubin and their colleagues are developing comprehensive general theories of causality. These general theories would incorporate the three notions of causality as special cases and would extend their conceptualizations and procedures, thus forming a new level-three notion of generalized causal relations.

References

  • Campbell, Donald T., and Julian C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, William G. 1968. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics (June): 205–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., and Nanny Wermuth. 2001. Some statistical aspects of causality. European Sociological Review 17: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., and Nanny Wermuth. 2004. Causality: A statistical view. International Statistical Review 72: 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glock, Charles, and Rodney Stark. 1966. Christian beliefs and antisemitism. New York: Harper & Row Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H. 1998. Causation, statistics and sociology. Dublin, Ireland: The Economic and Social Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Wagner Thielens Jr. 1958. The academic mind. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C.J.M., and T.A.B. Snijders. 2003. The multi-level approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Quality & Quantity 37: 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship. 2007. Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, Judea. [2000] 2009. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Donald B. [1984] 2006. William G. Cochran’s contributions to the design, analysis, and evaluation of observational studies. In Matched sampling for causal effects, ed. Donald B. Rubin, 7–29. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Judith D., and John B. Willett. 2003. Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, Samuel A. 1955. Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, Samuel A. 1992. Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind (with a new introduction by James A. Davis). New Brunswick: Transaction

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, Seymour. 1976. Applied sampling. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert B. Smith .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, R.B. (2011). Gauging Causality in Multilevel Models. In: Multilevel Modeling of Social Problems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9855-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics