Skip to main content

Geomagnetic Core Field Models in the Satellite Era

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geomagnetic Observations and Models

Part of the book series: IAGA Special Sopron Book Series ((IAGA,volume 5))

Abstract

After a brief review of the theoretical basis and difficulties that modelers are facing, we present three recent models of the geomagnetic field originating in the Earth’s core. All three modeling approaches are using recent observatory and near-Earth orbiting survey satellite data. In each case the specific aims and techniques used by the modelers are described together with a presentation of the main results achieved. The three different modeling approaches are giving similar results. For a snap shot of the core magnetic field at a given epoch and observed at the Earth’s surface, the differences between models are generally small. They do not exceed 16 nT which gives an idea of the accuracy of the models. Secular variation models are robustly resolved up to spherical harmonic degree 13, but only on time scale as large as 10 years. On time scale of a year, secular variation models are resolved only up to degree 8 or 9. For higher time derivatives of core field models, only the very first degrees are robustly derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barraclough DR (1976) Spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic secular variation—a review of methods. Phys Earth Planet Int 12:365–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraclough DR, Malin SRC (1979) Geomagnetic secular acceleration. Geophys J R Astr Soc 58:785–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain JC, Langel RA, Hendricks SJ (1966) First magnetic field results from the OGO-2 satellite. Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA

    Google Scholar 

  • Canet E, Fournier A, Jault D (2009) Forward and adjoint quasi-geostrophic models of the geomagnetic secular variation. J Geophys Res 114, B11101. doi:10.1029/2008JB006189

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier A, Eymin C, Alboussière T (2007) A case for variational geomagnetic data assimilation: insights from a one-dimensional, non-linear, and sparsely observed MHD system. Nonlinear Process Geophys 14(3):163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet N, Lesur V, Olsen N (2009) Geomagnetic core field secular variation models. Space Sci Rev. doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9586-6 (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton B, Macmillan S, Thomson A (2010) The BGS magnetic field candidate models for the 11th generation IGRF. Earth Planet Space (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulot G, Sabaka TJ, Olsen N (2007) The present field. In: Kono M (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 5:33–75. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson A, ART. Jonkers, Walker MR (2000), Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 358:957–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson A, Finlay C (2007) Geomagnetic secular variation and applications to the core. In: Kono M (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 5:147–193.05. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korte M, Constable CG (2004) Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia II: CALS7K. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. doi:10.1029/2004GC000801

    Google Scholar 

  • Langel RA, Ousley G, Berbert J, Murphy J, Settle M (1982) The Magsat mission. Geophys Res Lett 9:243–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langel R (1987) The main field. In: Jacobs JA (ed) Geomagnetism, vol 1. Academic, San Diego, CA, Orlando, pp 249–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Langel RA, Sabaka TJ, Baldwin RT, Conrad JA (1996) The near-earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled. Phys Earth Planet Int 98:235–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesur V, Macmillan S, Thomson A (2005) The BGS magnetic field candidate models for the 10th generation IGRF. Earth Planets Space 57:1157–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesur V, Wardinski I, Rother M, Mandea M (2008) GRIMM—The GFZ reference internal magnetic model based on vector satellite and observatory data. Geophys J Int. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03724.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesur V, Wardinski I, Asari S, Minchev B, Mandea M (2010a) Modelling the Earth’s core magnetic field under flow constraints. Earth Planets Space 62:503–516. doi: 10.547/eps.2010.02.010

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesur V, Wardinski I, Hamoudi M, Rother M (2010b) The second generation of the GFZ reference internal magnetic field model: GRIMM-2. Earth Planet Space (In print). doi: 10.547/eps.2010.07.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Tangborn A, Kuang W (2007) Observing system simulation experiments in geomagnetic data assimilation. J Geophys Res 112(B08103). doi: 10–10292006004691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandea M, Olsen N (2006) A new approach to directly determine the secular variation from magnetic satellite observations. Geophys Res Lett 33:15306. doi:10.1029/ 2006GL026616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maus S, Weidelt P (2004) Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth. Geophys Res Lett 31:12614. doi:10.1029/2004GL020232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maus S, McLean S, Dater D, Lühr H, Rother M, Mai W, Choi S (2005) NGDC/GFZ candidate models for the 10th generation international geomagnetic reference field. Earth Planets Space 57:1151–1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Maus S, Macmillan S, McLean S, Hamilton B, Thomson A, Nair M (2009) The US/UK world magnetic model for 2010–2015, Technical report, NOAA, 2009. Technical Report NESDIS/NGDC

    Google Scholar 

  • Menvielle M, Berthelier A (1991) The derived planetary indices: description and availability. Rev Geophys 29:415–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Holme R, Hulot G, Sabaka T, Neubert T, Tøffner-Clausen L, Primdahl F, Jørgensen J, Léger JM, Barraclough D, Bloxham J, Cain J, Constable C, Golovkov V, Jackson A, Kotzé P, Langlais B, Macmillan S, Mandea M, Merayo J, Newitt L, Purucker M, Risbo T, Stampe M, Thomson A, Voorhies C (2000) Ørsted initial field model. Geophys Res Lett 27(22):3607–3610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N (2002) A model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data. Geophys J Int 149:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Sabaka T, Lowes F (2005) New parameterisation of external and induced fields in geomagnetic field modelling, and a candidate model for IGRF 2005. Earth Planets Space 57:1141–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Lühr H, Sabaka TJ, Mandea M, Rother M, Tøffner-Clausen L, Choi S (2006) CHAOS—a model of Earth’s magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C magnetic satellite data. Geophys J Int 166:67–75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02959.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N (2007a) Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism. In: Gubbins D, Herrero-Bervera E (eds). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 743–746, Chap Ørsted

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Mandea M (2007b) Investigation of a secular variation impulse using satellite data: the 2003 geomagnetic jerk. Earth Planet Sci Lett 255:94–105. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.12.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Mandea M (2008) Rapidly changing flows in the Earth’s core. Nat Geosci 1(6):390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Mandea M, Sabaka TJ, Tøffner-Clausen L (2009) CHAOS-2—a geomagnetic field model derived from one decade of continuous satellite data. Geophys J Int. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04386.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Hulot G, Sabaka TJ (2010a) The geomagnetic field—its various field contributions and the data that enables their investigation. In: Freeden W, Nashed Z, Sonar T (eds) Handbook of geomathematics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen N, Mandea M, Sabaka TJ, Tøffner-Clausen L (2010b) The CHAOS-3 geomagnetic field model and candidates for the 11th Generation of IGRF. Earth Planet Space. (In print)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigber C, Lühr H, Schwintzer P (2002) CHAMP mission status. Adv Space Res 30(2):129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts PH, Scott S (1965) On the analysis of secular variation, 1, A hydromagnetic constraint: theory. J Geomag Geoelectr 17:137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaka T, Baldwin R (1993) Modeling the Sq magnetic field from POGO and Magsat satellite and contemporaneous hourly observatory data: phase I, Contract report HSTX 9302, Hughes STX Corp. for NASA/GSFC Contract NAS5-31 760

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaka TJ, Olsen N, Langel RA (2002) A comprehensive model of the quiet-time, near-Earth magnetic field: phase 3. Geophys J Int 151:32–68. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01774.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaka TJ, Olsen N, Purucker ME (2004) Extending comprehensive models of the Earth’s magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data. Geophys J Int 159:521–547. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02421.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson A, Lesur V (2007) An improved geomagnetic data selection algorithm for global geomagnetic field modelling. Geophys J Int 169:951–963. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03354.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson A, Hamilton B, Macmillan S, Reay S (2010) A novel weighting method for satellite magnetic data and a new global magnetic field model. Geophys J Int 181: issue 1 250–260. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04510.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Troshichev OA, Andresen VG, Vennerstrøm S, Friis-Christensen E (1988) Magnetic activity in the polar cap—a new index. Planet Space Sci 36:1095–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viljanen A, Hakkinen L (1997) Image magnetometer network, in satellite-ground based coordination. Technical report, ESA, Noordwijk, SP-1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardinski I, Holme R (2006) A time-dependent model of the Earth’s magnetic field and its secular variation for the period 1980–2000. J Geophys Res 111(B10):12101. doi:10.1029/2006JB004401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

AWPT would like to acknowledge the contributions of his BGS colleagues in global field modeling activities. The authors collectively would like to acknowledge the provision of geomagnetic satellite and magnetic observatory data from national institutes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Lesur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lesur, V., Olsen, N., Thomson, A.W. (2011). Geomagnetic Core Field Models in the Satellite Era. In: Mandea, M., Korte, M. (eds) Geomagnetic Observations and Models. IAGA Special Sopron Book Series, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9858-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics