Skip to main content
  • 966 Accesses

Abstract

Lubs et al. (Population cytogenetic studies in humans, 1977) found a detectably larger C-band-positive centromeric (cen+) region in chromosome 2 in 0.8% of 7- and 8-year-olds. No other studies have specifically addressed the frequency of 2cen+ in the normal population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lubs HA, Patil SR, Kimberling WJ, Brown J, Cohen M, Gerald P, Hecht F, Myrianthopoulos N, Summit RL (1977) Q and C-banding polymorphisms in 7 and 8 year old children: racial differences and clinical significance. In: Hook EB, Porter IH (eds) Population cytogenetic studies in humans. Academic Press, New York, pp 133–159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs PA, Melville M, Ratcliffe S (1974) A cytogenetic survey of 11,680 newborn infants. Ann Hum Genet 37:359–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen J, Sillesen I (1975) Incidence of chromosome aberrations in 11,148 newborn children. Hum Genet 30:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vejerslev LO, Friedrich U (1984) Experiences with unexpected structural chromosome aberrations in prenatal diagnosis in a Danish series. Prenat Diagn 4:181–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Djalali M, Steinbach P, Bullerdiek J, Holmes-Siedel M, Verschraegen-Spae MR, Smith A (1986) The significance of pericentric inversions of chromosome 2. Hum Genet 72:32–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. MacDonald IM, Cox DM (1985) Inversions of chromosome 2 (p11p13): frequency and implications for genetic counseling. Hum Genet 69:281–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hecht F, Hecht BK (1984) Fragile sites and chromosome breakpoints in constitutional rearrangements. II. Spontaneous abortions, stillbirths and newborns. Clin Genet 26:174–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Subrt I, Kozak J, Hnikova O (1973) Microdensitometric identification of the pericentric inversion of chromosome no. 2 and of duplication of the short arm of chromosome no. 7 in a reexamined case. Hum Hered 23:331–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hooft C, Coetsier H, Orye E (1968) Syndrome de Turner et inversion pericentrique probable du chromosome no. 2. Ann Genet (Paris) 11:181–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips RB (1978) Pericentric inversions inv(2)(p11q13) and inv(2)(p13q11) in two unrelated families. J Med Genet 15:388–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hesselbjerg U, Friedrich U (1979) Pericentric inversion in chromosome no. 2 as a de novo mutation. Humangenetik 53:117–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozma C, Subasinghe C, Meck J (1996) Prenatal detection of de novo inversion of chromosome (2)(p13q11.2) and postnatal follow-up. Prenat Diagn 16:366–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen MM, Rosenmann A, Hacham-Zadeh S, Dahan S (1975) Dicentric X-isochromosome (Xqidic) and pericentric inversion of no. 2 inv(2)(p15q12) in a patient with gonadal dysgenesis. Clin Genet 8:11–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wikramanayake E, Renwick JH, Feguson-Smith MA (1971) Chromosomal heteromorphisms in the assignment of loci to particular autosomes: a study of four pedigrees. Ann Genet (Paris) 14:245–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Verma RS, Dosik H, Wexler IB (1977) Inherited pericentric inversion of chromosome no. 2 with Robertsonian translocation (13q14q) resulting in trisomy for chromosome 13q. J de Genet Humaine 25:295–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sumption ND, Barber JCK (2001) A transmitted deletion of 2q13 to 2q14.1 causes no phenotypic abnormalities. J Med Genet 38:125–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ballif BC, Kashork CD, Shaffer L (2000) The promise and pitfalls of telomere region-specific probes. Am J Hum Genet 67:1356–1359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Herman E. Wyandt or Vijay S. Tonk .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wyandt, H.E., Tonk, V.S. (2011). Chromosome 2. In: Human Chromosome Variation: Heteromorphism and Polymorphism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0896-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics