The culture of marine ecology

Abstract

Marine algal ecology today faces many of the same problems as ecology in general, e.g. lack of generality of experimental results, the difficulty of making long-term predictions, and an apparent lack of agreement as to what constitutes the proper or ‘acceptable’ way of doing this particular component of science. These problems, if real, affect marine algal ecology everywhere but, in different geographical areas, specific problems also occur; science in parts of Asia has some problems different from those in other parts of the world. Since its inception, research in marine algal ecology has been motivated by many factors, ranging from traditional needs, to curiosity, to survival, to new technology, and economic needs. Each of these has shaped the questions that have been asked by, and the level of support society has been willing to supply to, ecology. For example the requisites of tradition pushed marine ecology to ask questions about food and ceremonial biota, and our fears today about loss of biota are pushing for answers to questions about the means of preserving biodiversity. The limitations of many marine ecological studies have been pointed out by different individuals. Their comments have been valuable in forcing us to examine what we are doing as marine ecologists, and how we are doing it. Ecology, and marine algal ecology with it, has been accused of carrying out small-scale studies that have no greater generality than the sites at which the studies were done, and of using statistical procedures that are wrong or inappropriate; also, there is disagreement within the ecological community of how to correct for these ‘faults’. Some of the problems arise due to the nature of our particular science, e.g. working with organisms with differing genetic makeup and sensitivity of experimental results to small changes in initial conditions. Other problems are more likely due to the individuals doing the science, e.g. an inability to be an ‘expert’ on all areas of knowledge required for a modern ecologist (taxonomy, experimental design, data analysis, etc.), and perhaps an unwillingness to recognize that in some instances different methods of data analysis are applicable and valid. As ecologists, we must come to grip with these problems, both for the sake of our science, and for our own sake as practicing ecologists.