Skip to main content

Foucault and Subjection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Self-Knowledge

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 26))

Abstract

A sceptical essentialist ethic of self-interpretation, founded on an obligation to avoid the mendacity involved in inducing deficient self-conceptions in others, looks to have significant normative force. But how might it apply outside of the personal relationships investigated by Sartre, in a broader social context, in which self-conscious sadism (and masochism) seems to be uncommon? This chapter addresses this question with reference to the work of Michel Foucault. Although Foucault rejected key elements of phenomenology, his account of the power effects of disciplinary technologies has clear parallels with Sartre’s account of sadism in concrete relations with others. At the same time, he emphasises that disciplinary power does not require an agent, and may be diffused throughout social institutions. Foucault did not regard himself as an ethicist, in any conventional sense; but in highlighting the price we pay for scientific self-knowledge, his findings have clear implications for those whose professional roles involve the acquisition and deployment of such knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See de Beauvoir 1952.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., Introduction and passim.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., pp. 650–1, and passim.

  4. 4.

    See Foucault 1988a.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., p. 21.

  6. 6.

    In an interview first published in 1984 (English translation 1985) Foucault goes so far as to say that ‘My entire philosophical development was determined by my reading of Heidegger’ (Foucault 1988b, p. 250). On this general theme see Lucas 2002.

  7. 7.

    Foucault 1980a, pp. 78–9.

  8. 8.

    Foucault 1988a, p. 30.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    See Foucault 1977b.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., p. 142.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., pp. 144–7.

  13. 13.

    Sartre 1989, p. 251.

  14. 14.

    For this view of honesty, and the associated notion of a good intellectual conscience, see Nietzsche 1974, sections 110, 114, 319.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., section 110.

  16. 16.

    Nietzsche 1966, section 227.

  17. 17.

    For example, with his notion of bad faith.

  18. 18.

    See Foucault 1977b.

  19. 19.

    See Heidegger 1962, p. 167.

  20. 20.

    Foucault 1977b, p. 154.

  21. 21.

    Foucault 1989a, p. 207. Note that Foucault’s ‘archaeological’ method, as set out in this work, is not identical to his later ‘genealogical’ method, referred to earlier. While the emphasis on historical origins remains a constant, the genealogical method shifts the explicit focus from the historical formation of rules, to concrete historical struggles. This requires, as Foucault expresses it in ‘Truth and Power’ (Foucault 1980b, p. 114), a shift from analyses couched in terms of language and signs to analyses couched in terms of force, power and tactics.

  22. 22.

    Foucault 1989b, p. 119.

  23. 23.

    And lest it be thought that one of them is ‘objective’ and the other merely ‘instrumental’ it should be borne in mind that it may be the builder who needs to call in the mycologist for an expert opinion.

  24. 24.

    Foucault 1989b, p. 191.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., pp. 196–8.

  26. 26.

    Foucault 1981, p. 64.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., part 3.

  28. 28.

    See Foucault 1989b, pp. 197–9.

  29. 29.

    Foucault 1981, p. 63.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., p. 62.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., pp. 58–63.

  32. 32.

    The Foucauldian episteme is thus analogous to Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm. Note though that whereas the Kuhnian paradigm aims to capture what distinguishes the sciences of a given period from each other, the Foucauldian episteme aims to capture what unites them, and at the same time distinguishes them from those of other periods. The Order of Things (Foucault 1970) is his most systematic attempt to investigate this.

  33. 33.

    Foucault 1977a, part 1.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., pp. 57–69.

  35. 35.

    Ibid., part 2, section 1.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., pp. 110–13.

  37. 37.

    Ibid., pp. 120–31.

  38. 38.

    Ibid., pp. 200–4.

  39. 39.

    Ibid., p. 201.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., pp. 201–3. See also Foucault 1981, p. 60.

  41. 41.

    For further discussion of this point see Lucas 2002.

  42. 42.

    Foucault 1977a, pp. 187–94.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., p. 128.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., pp. 170–7.

References

  • de Beauvoir, Simone. 1952. The second sex (trans: Parshley, H.M.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977a. Discipline and punish (trans: Sheridan, A.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977b. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Language, counter-memory, practice, ed. Donald F. Bouchard, 139–164. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980a. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980b. Truth and power. In Power/knowledge, ed. Colin Gordon, 109–133. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1981. The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality, Vol. 1 (trans: Hurley, R.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1988a. Critical theory/intellectual history. In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984, ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman, 17–46. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, 1988b. The return of morality. In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984, ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman, 242–254. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1989a. The archaeology of knowledge (trans: Sheridan, A.M.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1989b. The birth of the clinic (trans: Sheridan, A.M.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Peter. 2002. Mind-forg’d manacles and habits of the soul: Foucault’s debt to Heidegger. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32(2):310–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1966. Beyond good and evil. In Basic writings of Nietzsche, ed. Walter Kaufman, 179–435. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1974. The gay science (trans: Kaufman, W.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1989. Being and nothingness (trans: Barnes, H.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Lucas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucas, P. (2011). Foucault and Subjection. In: Ethics and Self-Knowledge. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1560-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics