Skip to main content

Improving Grades: Urban Public Schools, Racial and Socioeconomic Segregation, and the Promise of Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers in Sociology of Education

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research ((FSSR,volume 1))

Abstract

Increasingly, public schools have student populations that are overwhelmingly minority, disproportionately poor, and more likely to drop out or have below grade-level skills in academic performance (Orfield and Gordon 2001). The path to this juncture has been well chronicled in the vast literature on urban education, which describes decades of racial and socioeconomic shifts in neighborhood composition, misguided policies, ill-informed intervention strategies, blatant neglect, and well-intentioned but ultimately unsuccessful attempts to compensate for past indifferences. Going forward, we face the prospect of a trove of innovations and policies that address the academic attainment of minority youth who are overrepresented in poorly performing urban public schools. Whether these efforts will have a fundamental impact on the school outcomes of poor urban Americans or will register as just another piecemeal approach to system change is unclear. Ultimately, however, the likelihood of success will depend in large part on a coordinated approach to change, one that addresses the root causes of inequality, including socioeconomic and residential segregation as well as the disconnect between the out-of-school and academic experiences of urban, minority families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blank, Rebecca M., and David T. Ellwood. 2001. The Clinton Legacy for America’s Poor. NBER Working Paper 8437. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Xavier de Souze, Susan J. Popkin, and John Goering. 2010. Moving to opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, Anthony S., and Barbara Schneider. 2002. Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, Maureen T. 2001. Sociological perspectives on black-white inequalities in American schooling. Sociology of Education 74: 50–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jargowsky, Paul A. 2003. Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s. Living cities census series, Center on urban and metropolitan studies. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Dan A., and Nakagawa Kathryn. 1995. Race and educational reform in the American metropolis: A study of school decentralization. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, Jeffrey, Robert Sampson, and Stephan Raudenbush. 2001. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of homicide. Criminology 39: 517–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckerman, Kathryn M. 2007. Schools betrayed: Roots of failure in inner-city education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, Gary, and Nora Gordon. 2001. Schools more separate: consequences of a decade of resegregation. New Research Findings. Cambridge: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, Robert, Stephan Raudenbush, and Felton Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, Robert J., Patrick Sharkey, and Stephan W. Raudenbush. 2008. Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 845–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, Patrick. 2008. The intergenerational transmission of context. American Journal of Sociology 113: 931–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, Patrick, and Felix Elwert. 2010. The Legacy of Disadvantage: Multigenerational Neighborhood Effects on Cognitive Ability. CDE WP 2010–06. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Amy S., Jennifer J. Holme, Anita J. Revilla, and Awo K. Atanda. 2005. How society failed school desegregation policy: Looking past the schools to understand them. Review of Research in Education 28: 47–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Maureen T. Hallinan and Jessica Houston Su for comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. Quane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quane, J.M., Wilson, W.J. (2011). Improving Grades: Urban Public Schools, Racial and Socioeconomic Segregation, and the Promise of Innovation. In: Hallinan, M. (eds) Frontiers in Sociology of Education. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1576-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics