Skip to main content

Does Tree Management Affect Biomass and Soil Carbon Stocks of Acacia mangium Willd. Stands in Kerala, India?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Agroforestry ((ADAG,volume 8))

Abstract

Initial spacing and tree pruning are silvicultural strategies that influence tree growth and productivity, which determine the potential of tree stands to store C in the vegetation and soil. A field experiment was conducted at Thiruvazhamkunnu, Kerala, India in a 6.5 year-old Acacia mangium stand to evaluate the changes in vegetation and soil (0–15 cm) C pools as a function of four planting densities (625, 1,250, 2,500, and 5,000 stems ha−1), with and without 50% crown pruning. Both tree planting density and crown pruning significantly (p  <  0.01) influenced the C stocks of A. mangium trees. Total vegetation (aboveground  +  roots) C was highest for the 5,000 trees ha−1 (81.82 Mg ha−1) and lowest in the 625 trees ha−1 treatment (41.39 Mg ha−1). Soil C stocks also co-varied among the density regimes with the lowest values for treeless control plots. Overall, denser stands promote C storage, but very high stand densities (e.g., 5,000 stems ha−1) may adversely affect tree growth and productivity, reducing vegetation C pools. Likewise, intense pruning may depress the vegetation C pool and would release CO2 from the pruned biomass, especially if the slash are burnt or decomposed. Pruning effects are, however, dependent on stand density, implying the need for optimizing crown pruning regimes in conjunction with stand density levels. By extension, stand thinning exerts negative or positive feedbacks on biomass accretion depending on stand density, which may also influence the amount of C sequestered by the trees. Information reported in the literature confirms this. Irrigating the trees during water scarcity periods also may promote soil and vegetation C sequestration. But inorganic fertilization may have positive, negative, or neutral effects depending on site fertility, species, fertilizer doses, and the stage of stand development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1989) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 171 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Awang K, Taylor D (eds) (1993) Acacia mangium: growing and utilization. MPTS Monograph Series No. 3. Winrock International and FAO, Bangkok, 280 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle C, Barry K, Hardiyanto E, Irianto R, Junarto Mohammed C, Rimbawanto A (2007) Effect of pruning Acacia mangium on growth, form and heart rot. For Ecol Manage 238:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK (1997) Silvicultural options to conserve and sequester carbon in forest systems: Preliminary economic assessment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27(Special):139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George SJ, Kumar BM (1998) Litter dynamics and cumulative soil fertility changes in silvopastoral systems of a humid tropical region in central Kerala. Int Tree Crops J 9:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (2003) Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Glob Change Biol 9:1438–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N, Kukal SS, Bawa SS, Dhaliwal GS (2009) Soil organic carbon and aggregation under poplar based agroforestry system in relation to tree age and soil type. Agroforest Syst 76:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyenge JE, Fernańdez ME, Schlichter TM (2010) Effect of stand density and pruning on growth of ponderosa pines in NW Patagonia, Argentina. Agroforest Syst 78:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heriansyah I, Miyakuni K, Kato T, Kiyono Y, Kanazawa Y (2007) Growth characteristics and biomass accumulations of Acacia mangium under different management practices in Indonesia. J Trop For Sci 19(4):226–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter I (2001) Above ground biomass and nutrient uptake of three tree species (Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus grandis and Dalbergia sissoo) as affected by irrigation and fertilizer, at 3 years of age, in southern India. For Ecol Manage 144:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac ME, Gordon AM, Thevathasan N, Oppong SK, Quashie-Sam J (2005) Temporal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen in West African multistrata agroforestry systems: a chronosequence of pools and fluxes. Agroforest Syst 65:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Asia Publishing House, New Delhi, 498 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritze R, Hagedorn F, Johnsong DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137(3–4):253–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobidon R (1993) Nitrate fertilisation stimulates emergence of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) under forest canopy. Fert Res 36:91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAU (2002) Package of practices recommendations: crops, 12th edn. Directorate of Extension, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 278 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK (2010) Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15:489–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C (2008) Soil carbon storage, litterfall and CO2 efflux in fertilized and unfertilized larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. Ecol Res 23:757–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Deepu JK (1992) Litter production and decomposition dynamics in moist deciduous forest of the Western Ghats in Peninsular India. For Ecol Manage 50:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Vishwanath S (2005) Tree allometry, volume and aboveground biomass yield in a seven year-old Acacia mangium Willd. stand at Thirvazhamkunnu, India. In: Tewari VP, Srivastava RL (eds) Multipurpose trees in the Tropics: Management and Improvement Strategies. Proceedings of the international symposium. Multipurpose trees in the tropics: assessment, growth and management. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S (2009) Does thinning affect litterfall, litter decomposition, and associated nutrient release in Acacia mangium stands of Kerala in peninsular India? Can J For Res 39:792–801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S, Sureshkumar P (2010) Root activity of young Acacia mangium Willd trees: influence of stand density and pruning as studied by 32P soil injection technique. Agroforest Syst 78:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxmoore RJ, Tharp ML, Post WM (2008) Simulated biomass and soil carbon of loblolly pine and cottonwood plantations across a thermal gradient in southeastern United States. For Ecol Manage 254(2):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majid NM, Paudyal BK (1992) Pruning trial for Acacia mangium Wild. plantation in Peninsular Malaysia. For Ecol Manage 47:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319:169–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markewitz D (2006) Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: Impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests. For Ecol Manage 236:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009a) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Haile SG (2009b) Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a feasibility appraisal. Environ Sci Policy 12(8):1099–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette AJ, Hawryshyn A, Senikas V, Potvin C (2009) Enrichment planting in secondary forests: a promising clean development mechanism to increase terrestrial carbon sinks. Ecol Soc 14(1):31

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2010) Carbon storage in relation to soil size-fractions under tropical tree-based land use systems. Plant Soil 328:433–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samek JH, Skole DL, Klinhom U, Butthep C, Navanugraha C, Uttaruk P, Laosuwan T, Dumrongsukit S, Sangkanukij P, Kulwong T (2011) Inpang community network agroforestry carbon bank in northeast Thailand. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 263–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanavas A, Kumar BM (2006) Physical and mechanical properties of three agroforestry tree species from Kerala, India. J Trop Agric 44:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Shujauddin N, Kumar BM (2003) Ailanthus triphysa at different densities and fertilizer regimes in Kerala, India: growth, yield, nutrient use efficiency and nutrient export through harvest. For Ecol Manage 180:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG (2008) Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations. For Ecol Manage 255(3–4):920–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. K. Kunhamu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunhamu, T.K., Kumar, B.M., Samuel, S. (2011). Does Tree Management Affect Biomass and Soil Carbon Stocks of Acacia mangium Willd. Stands in Kerala, India?. In: Kumar, B., Nair, P. (eds) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics