Skip to main content

Diverse Ruralities in the 21st Century: From Effacement to (Re-)Invention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Rural Demography

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 3))

Abstract

“Rurality” within academic analysis has frequently been dismissed as something of an anachronism in modern times from primarily an ontological perspective. Yet, also as both concept and sensed reality it equally refuses to die. This chapter draws on recent rural scholarship, mostly from the UK and North America, to examine how in the light of this existential tension “rurality” is (to be) interpreted in the early 21st century. It begins by outlining briefly why rurality has often been seen as anachronistic, especially by critical scholars keen to distinguish robust “rational abstraction” from obfuscatory “chaotic conception.” However, not least from the perspective of how we go on within everyday life, any idea of rurality as almost completely effaced is inadequate. This leads to the chapter presenting four interpretations of rurality today. First, it is interpreted as “representation” and then, following a desire to ground this interpretation, also as “practice.” The chapter then interrogates the representational interpretation and the idea of rurality as invented further through first developing the idea of “rurality beyond the rural” but then, drawing upon recent social scientific interest on the more-than-representational, presenting a final interpretation of rurality as still being at least partly embodied and grounded. In conclusion, all four interpretations of rurality may be intellectually worthwhile in their own right today but each has its own demographic consequences. The chapter ends by reflecting on some implications of accepting inherently diverse interpretations of rurality for demographic practice in the 21st century.

It is back again: the recurrent onset of academic rural doubt in the US. It [has] been 20 years or so since the last onset… when Bill Friedland [1982] engaged a debate about the end of rural society and the future of rural sociology. But recent discussions indicate that US rural scholars are once more in the midst of this uncertain mood (Bell, 2007, p. 402)

In short, morbid thoughts about the rural abound (Bell, 2008, p. 6)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to Dr. María Jesús Rivera Escribano for this example.

  2. 2.

    Carolan actually refers to “conceptions of the countryside” rather than rurality.

  3. 3.

    At least in the global North, although much of what has been argued conceptually here, if not the specific illustrative cases, is equally applicable within the global South. Generally, in the latter rurality has been less totally effaced and rural localities (Halfacree, 2006) remain more strongly defined, at least in remoter locations. However, the appropriateness of our classifications for demographic analysis still require careful thought.

References

  • Al-Hindi, K., & Staddon, C. (1997). The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1988). Selected writings. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylina, M., & Berg, N. (2010). Selling the countryside: Representations of rurality in Norway and Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17, 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, C. (1975). The revival of population growth in non-metropolitan America. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, ERS 605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeton, S. (2010). The advance of film tourism. Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development, 7, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 149–160). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. M. (2007). The two-ness of rural life and the ends of rural scholarship. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 402–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. M. (2008). Mobilizing the countryside: Rural power and the power of the rural. Paper presented at Agrarian Studies Seminar, March. Retrieved March 2010, from http://Www.Yale.Edu/Agrarianstudies/Papers/22bell.Pdf.

  • Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., & Venn, C. (2010). Affect. Body and Society, 16, 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Wardwell, J. (Eds.). (1980). New directions in urban-rural migration: The population turnaround in rural America. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, M. (1994). The countryside ideal. Anglo-American images of landscape. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, M. (2003). Reproducing rural idylls. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 14–30). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. (2008). More-than-representational knowledge/s of the countryside: How we think as bodies. Sociologia Ruralis, 48, 408–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. (2009). ‘I do therefore there is’: Enlivening socio-environmental theory. Environmental Politics, 18, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion A. (1998). Studying counterurbanisation and the rural population turnaround. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas. Theories and issues (pp. 21–40). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, T., & Hugo, G. (2004). Introduction: Moving beyond the urban-rural dichotomy. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.), New forms of urbanization. Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy (pp. 3–24). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (1989). Rural geography and political economy. In R. Peet & N. Thrift (Eds.), New models in geography (Vol. 1, pp. 164–197). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (1996). Rural life-styles: Material opportunity, cultural experience, and how theory can undermine policy. Economic Geography, 72, 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (Ed.). (2003a). Country visions. Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (2003b). Knowing ruralities? In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 1–13). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 18–28). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., Goodwin, M., & Milbourne, P. (1998). Inside looking out; outside looking in. Different experiences of cultural competence in rural lifestyles. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues (pp. 134–150). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., & Little, J. (Eds.). (1997). Contested countryside cultures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., Marsden, T., & Mooney, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of rural studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradson, D. (2005). Landscape, care and the relational self: Therapeutic encounters in rural England. Health and Place, 11, 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp, J. (1972). Rural sociology and rural development. Rural Sociology, 37, 515–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D. (2006). Tourism, consumption and rurality. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 355–364). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croy, W. (2010). Planning for film tourism: Active destination image management. Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development, 7, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, J. (2009). A play for rurality – modernization versus local autonomy. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Casino, V., & Hanna, S. (2006). Beyond the ‘binaries’: A methodological intervention for interrogating maps as representational practices. ACME, 4, 34–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2006). Performing rurality. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 484–495). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, W. (1982). The end of rural society and the future of rural sociology. Rural Sociology, 47, 589–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouws, J. (1998). The contested redefinition of the countryside. An analysis of rural discourses in the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis, 38, 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesler, W. (1992). Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H., & Abrams, J. (2009). Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal online. Retrieved march 2010, from http://Www.Springerlink.Com/Content/9l40n2843572mm05/Fulltext.Pdf

  • Hadden, J., & Barton, J. (1973). An image that will not die: Thoughts on the history of anti-urban ideology. Urban Affairs Annual Review, 7, 79–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (1993). Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2001). Constructing the object: Taxonomic practices, ‘counterurbanisation’ and positioning marginal rural settlement. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 44–62). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2009a). Rurality and post-rurality. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 9, pp. 449–456). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2009b). Urban-rural continuum. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 1, pp. 119–124). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K., & Boyle, P. (1998). Migration, rurality and the post-productivist countryside. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues (pp. 1–12). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart, K. (1990). Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 6, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (1990). West Edmonton Mall: Landscape of myths and elsewhereness. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 34, 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. (1997). Rurality and ‘cultures of womanhood’. Domestic identities and moral orders in village life. In P. Cloke & J. Little (Eds.), Contested countryside cultures (pp. 123–137). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1995). Building, dwelling, living: How people and animals make themselves at home in the world. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Shifting contexts: Transformations in anthropological knowledge (pp. 57–80). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2001). The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power? Environment and Planning A, 33, 1185–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2003). ‘The restraint of beasts’: Rurality, animality, Actor Network Theory and dwelling. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 283–307). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O., & Cloke, P. (2002). Tree cultures. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: Mcgraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. (1899/1988). The agrarian question. Winchester, MA: Zwan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (2010). Urban social geography. An introduction (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krannich, R. (2008). Rural sociology at the crossroads. Rural Sociology, 73, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. (2003). The view from Cobb Gate: Falling into liminal geography. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 93–115). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, J. (2008). Retreating to nature: Rethinking ‘therapeutic landscapes’. Area, 40, 90–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. (2003). ‘Riding the Rural Love Train’: Heterosexuality and the rural community. Sociologia Ruralis, 43, 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J., & Austin, P. (1996). Women and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 12, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L. (1996). A sociology of the periphery versus a peripheral sociology: Rural sociology and the dimension of space. Rural Sociology, 61, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., Murdoch, J., & Cox, G. (1995). A civilised retreat? Anti-urbanism, rurality and the making of an Anglo-centric culture. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, & A. Madani-Pour (Eds.), Managing cities (pp. 63–82). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, M. (2007). New populations, shifting expectations: The changing experience of rural space and place. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Munton, R., Whatmore, S., & Little, J. (1986). Towards a political economy of agriculture: A British perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 11, 498–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Munton, R., & Flynn, A. (1993). Constructing the countryside. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848/1998). The communist manifesto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, P. (Ed.). (1997). Revealing rural ‘others’. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingay, G. (Ed.). (1989). The rural idyll. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordue, T. (1999). Heartbeat country: Conflicting values, coinciding visions. Environment and Planning A, 31, 629–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1990). Who is rural? Or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural. In T. Marsden, P. Lowe, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Rural restructuring (pp. 21–44). London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. (2003). Co-constructing the countryside: Hybrid networks and the extensive self. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 263–282). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., & Marsden, T. (1994). Reconstituting rurality. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., & Pratt, A. (1993). Rural studies: Modernism, postmodernism and the ‘post-rural’. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, N., Flanagan, S., & Gilbert, D. (2008). The integration of film-induced tourism and destination branding in Yorkshire, UK. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10, 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. (2002). Consuming the West. Space and Culture, 5, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Fish, R., & Agg, J. (2001). Putting together ruralities: Towards a symbolic analysis of rurality in the British mass media. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poston, D., & Bouvier, L. (2010). Population and society. An introduction to demography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2000). Celebration chronicles. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1984). Method in social science. London: Hutchinson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1989). The ‘new’ regional geography and problems of narrative. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7, 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, R. (1989). Social spatialization and the built environment: The West Edmonton Mall. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, B. (2006). Idyllic ruralities. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 133–148). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. (1991). Imagined country. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural politics of everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, S. (1992). Ways of seeing, ways of being: Literature, place and tourism in L.M. Montgomery’s Prince Edward Island. In P. Simpson-Housley & G. Norcliffe (Eds.), A few acres of snow: Literary and artistic images of Canada (pp. 137–147). Toronto, ON: Dundurn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, D. (2005). After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography. Area, 37, 350–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2005). But malice aforethought: Cities and the natural history of hatred. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. (1993). On doing rural research (or breaking the boundaries). Environment and Planning A, 25, 605–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1973). The country and the city. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2005). Rural geography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2009). Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 849–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2010). Performing rurality and practicing rural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author extends special thanks to László Kulcsár for his initial invitation to write this chapter and for his unwavering support over its subsequent gestation, especially during the times that the author’s written progress was not always as rapid as he would have wished!

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Halfacree .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halfacree, K. (2012). Diverse Ruralities in the 21st Century: From Effacement to (Re-)Invention. In: Kulcsár, L., Curtis, K. (eds) International Handbook of Rural Demography. International Handbooks of Population, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics