Abstract
The ultimate goal of Beeby’s progressivism was teachers with a style appropriate to his fourth stage of Meaning, and he unsympathetically viewed the ritualistic Dame School or Formalism teacher as “an unskilled and ignorant one who teaches mere symbols with only the vaguest reference to their meaning” (Beeby 1966, p. 52). In his view, five factors affected professional conservatism in both developed and developing countries: lack of clear goals in the system affecting teachers’ thinking, lack of understanding and acceptance by teachers of reforms, teachers as products of a system not being prone to innovate, isolation of teachers in their classroom slowing down diffusion of innovations, and a wide range of ability of teachers making diffusion rates uneven (Beeby 1966, pp. 35-47). This carried a pejorative implication for his third theoretical proposition that the key to a school’s movement through the stages is the ability of its teachers to promote change. Teacher inability to bring about the progressive changes necessary to raise a school system to the highest stage was the reason that gradualism was necessary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcorn, N. (1999). ‘To the fullest extent of his powers’: C.E. Beeby’s life in education. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Alexander: R. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alexander, R. (2001). Border crossings: Towards a comparative pedagogy. Comparative Education, 37(4), 507–523.
Beeby, C.E. (1966). The quality of education in developing countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Beeby, C.E. (1980a). Reply to Gerard Guthrie. International Review of Education, 26(4), 439–444.
Beeby, C.E. (1980b). The thesis of stages fourteen years later. International Review of Education, 26(4), 451–474.
Beeby, C.E., & Lewis, L.J. (1971). Introduction [to Special Number on educational trends in some developing countries]. International Review of Education, 17(2), 131–137.
Clarke, P. (2001). Teaching and learning: The culture of pedagogy. New Delhi: Sage.
Clarke, P. (2003). Culture and classroom reform: The case of the District Primary Education Project, India. Comparative Education, 39(1), 27–44.
Clayton, A.S. (1972). Valuation in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 16(3), 412–423.
Coombs, H. (1969). Time for a change of strategy. In C.E. Beeby (Ed.), Qualitative aspects of educational planning (pp. 15–35). Paris: UNESCO Institute of International Educational Planning.
Ginsberg, L., Nackerud, L., & Larrison, C. (2004). Human biology for social workers: Development, ecology, genetics, and health. Boston: Pearson.
Guthrie, G. (1980a). Stages of educational development? Beeby revisited. International Review of Education, 26(4), 411–438.
Guthrie, G. (1980b). Response [to C.E. Beeby] from Gerard Guthrie. International Review of Education, 26(4), 445–449.
Guthrie, G. (2010). Basic research methods: An entry to social science research. New Delhi: Sage.
Hagen, E.E. (1962). On the theory of social change: How economic growth begins. Homewood: Dorsey.
Hawkins, J. (2007). The intractable dominant educational paradigm. In P. Hershock, M. Mason, & J. Hawkins (Eds.), Changing education: Leadership, innovation and development in a globalizing Asia-Pacific (pp. 137–162). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Kuznets, S. (1963). Notes on the take-off. In W.W. Rostow (Ed.), The economics of take-off into sustained growth (pp. 22–43). London: Macmillan.
Musgrave, P.W. (1974). Primary schools, teacher training and change: Beeby reconsidered – Some data for the Pacific. Papua New Guinea Journal of Education, 10(1), 42–47.
Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An enquiry into the poverty of nations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund (3 Vols.).
Myrdal, G. (1969). Objectivity in social research. New York: Pantheon.
Nakabugo, M., & Sieborger, R. (2001). Curriculum reform and teaching in South Africa: Making a ‘paradigm shift’? International Journal of Educational Development, 21(1), 53–60.
Nguyen, P-M., Elliott, J., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2009). Neocolonialism in education: Cooperative learning in an Asian context. Comparative Education, 45(1), 109–130.
Omolewa, M. (2007). Traditional African modes of education: Their relevance in the modern world. International Review of Education, 53(5–6), 593–612.
Popper, K. (1969). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (3rd Ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach (Rev. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Regan, T. (1996). Non-western educational traditions: Alternative approaches to educational thought and practice. Narwah: Erlbaum.
Renwick, W.L. (1998). Clarence Edward Beeby (1902–98). Prospects, 28(2), 335–348.
Rostow, W.W. (1971). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, H. (2008). Beyond the World Bank agenda: An institutional approach to development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tabulawa, R. (1997). Pedagogical classroom practice and the social context: The case of Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 17(2), 189–194.
Tabulawa, R. (1998). Teachers’ perspectives on classroom practice in Botswana: Implications for pedagogical change. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 249–268.
Vaizey, J.E. (1966). ‘Planning for education in Pakistan’, by A. Curle; and ‘The quality of education in developing countries’, by C.E. Beeby. Harvard Educational Review, 36(4), 533–536.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guthrie, G. (2011). Teacher Resistance To Change. In: The Progressive Education Fallacy in Developing Countries. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1851-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1851-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1850-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1851-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)