Skip to main content

Reconsidering Realism on Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights

Abstract

International Realism is widely interpreted as hostile to international human rights. “Realist” thinkers like Henry Kissinger, Kenneth Waltz, and Danilo Zolo are typically relied on in order to discredit attempts to defend and better institutionalize human rights. In fact, major “classical” Realists (e.g., E.H. Carr, Hans Morgenthau, Reinhold Niebuhr) cautiously defended emerging conceptions of international human rights. Their views overlao in revealing ways with contemporary Cosmopolitanism. Like many contemporary Cosmopolitans, they sympathized with ambitious models of global legal and political order. Despite this overlap, mid-century Realism can be employed to developed a sympathetic yet powerful critique of Cosmopolitanism, which sometimes closes its eyes to power inequality on the global scale and the many dilemmas raised by inequality for the attempt to achieve a normatively acceptable institutionalization of human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    What follows is a compendium drawn from Beitz (1979), Caney (2005), Doyle (1997), and Habermas (2006), but this critical view can be found among countless others as well.

  2. 2.

    Think, for example, of longstanding US political hostility to social and economic rights.

  3. 3.

    Many contemporary Cosmopolitans, I should add, still tend to downplay them.

  4. 4.

    It does, however, quite correctly dispense with traditional socialist theory’s economistic view of power.

  5. 5.

    As Craig (2003) perceptively shows, however, Waltz’s theory rests implicitly on many normative – and oftentimes institutionally conservative – preferences of its own. Because Craig misses some of the ways in which Realists tried to theorize supranational or world society, his view of the Waltzian revolution remains incomplete.

  6. 6.

    See also Coates (2000) for a critique of Zolo.

References

  • Archibugi, D. 2008. The global commonwealth of citizens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, R. 1981. Political realism and human interests. International Studies Quarterly 25: 204–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. 1979. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. 2009. Claiming rights across borders: International human rights and democratic sovereignty. American Political Science Review 103(4): 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. 2005. Justice beyond borders: A global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. 1964 [1939]. The twenty years’ crisis: 1919–1939. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. 2003 [1949]. Rights and obligations. In From Napolean to Stalin and other essays, ed. E.H. Carr, 177–183. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, T. 2000. Neither cosmopolitanism nor realism: A response to Danilo Zolo. In Global democracy: Key debates, ed. B. Holden, 87–102. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. 2003. Glimmer of a new Leviathan: Total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, M. 1997. Ways of war and peace. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2006. The divided West. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. 2004. Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, J. 1959. International politics in an Atomic Age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, J. 1976. The nation-state and the crisis of world politics. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, Andrew. 2000. EH Carr, nationalism, and the future of the sovereign state. In EH Carr: A critical appraisal, ed. M. Cox, 234–257. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. 2005. Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq war: Realism versus Neoconservatism. Available at: www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522jsp

  • Mitrany, D. 1946. A working peace system. London: National Peace Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1946. Scientific man vs. power politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1949. National interest and moral principles in foreign policy: The primacy of the national interest. American Scholar 18: 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1954. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace, 2nd ed. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1973. The danger of détente. New Leader 56: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1979. Human rights and foreign policy. New York: Council on Religion and International affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. 1944. Children of light and children of darkness. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. 1953. Christian realism and political problems. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. 2004. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. In Political restructuring in Europe: Ethical perspectives, ed. C. Brown, 89–122. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. 2009. The perils of global legalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, S., and K. Waltz. 2003. The spread of nuclear weapons: A debate renewed. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. 2009. Morgenthau: Realism and beyond. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. 2010. The (classical) realist case for global reform. International Theory 2(2): 246–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. 2011. The realist case for global reform. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, F. 1952. The commonwealth of man: An inquiry into power politics and world government. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenberger, G. 1951. Power politics; a study of international society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenberger, G. 1964. Power politics: A study of world society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of international politics. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolo, D. 1997. Cosmopolis: Prospects for world government. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolo, D. 2002. Invoking humanity: War, law and global order. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolo, D. 2010. Victor’s justice: From Nuremberg to Baghdad. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Scheuerman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheuerman, W.E. (2012). Reconsidering Realism on Rights. In: Corradetti, C. (eds) Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2376-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics