Abstract
Donati is one of the best known Italian authors on social sciences. He is a professor at the University of Bologna and member of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. He has written over 90 books, which have influenced parts of the encyclical Caritas in Veritate. His main theory is the ‘relational configuration of society’ which he here applies to economy. We are very proud of having won him for our project. In his essay he elaborates on the statement of Caritas in Veritate, that the exclusively binary model of State-market is corrosive of society (Benedict XVI. 2009. Encyclical Caritas in veritate. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.). He shows that, in order to go beyond the present domination of the binomial market-State (lib-lab in Donati’s language), which destroys sociality, we need much more than good, honest and altruistic individuals: we need a societal configuration able to generate relational goods. Relational good is the name of the common good in a highly differentiated and globalised society. His theory is innovative and can be considered to be of great interest for the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is certainly remarkable that Catholic anthropology has been associated with the Islamic Ummah on the grounds that Islamic finance is reported to use money only as a means and not as a goal, which would explain why Islamic financial institutions were able to avoid being crashed by the world crisis of September 2008 (cf. Milano 2010).
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
A champion of this approach, Ralph Dahrendorf (1994) sees citizenship as a gift granted (octroyée) by an enlightented political élite, including entitlements guaranteed by the State versus other provisions offered by the free market.
- 5.
- 6.
The well-known expression was first proposed by J. Habermas (1981), who deals with such pathologies in terms of communicative forms and not as a more complex problem. At the cultural level it has been employed by Charles Taylor.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
In the AGIL terms, the Adaptation function prevails on the Latency function.
- 10.
- 11.
I take it that modernity corresponds to a society spirit and model of a functional type (as has been clarified very well by Niklas Luhmann’s own theory). I see functionalism as the root of the scientific-technological approach typical of the West and of Western modernity, as Davis (1959) described it.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
I am referring to individual A, G, I, L sub-systems with the institutions thereof.
- 15.
J. J. Rousseau’s works, for instance, provide a paradigmatic example of this position, which has justified an apolitical individualism and at the same time State dictatorships within modernity (cf. Spaemann 2009).
Bibliography
Archer, M.S. 2000. Being human. The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2007. Essere umani. Il problema dell’agire, ed. Prandini, R. Genova-Milano: Marietti.
Archer, M.S. 2003. Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2006. La conversazione interiore. Come nasce l’agire sociale. Trento: Edizioni Erickson.
Archer, M.S. 2007. Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2009. Riflessività umana e percorsi di vita. Come la soggettività umana influenza la mobilità sociale. Trento: Erickson.
Archer, M.S. 2009. L’enciclica di Benedetto provoca la teoria sociale. Vita e Pensiero XCII 5: 52–56.
Archer, M.S. (ed.). 2010. Conversations about reflexivity. London/New York: Routledge.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press. Italian translation: 1999. Modernizzazione riflessiva. Trieste: Asterios.
Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. The theory of reflexive modernization. Problematic, hypotheses and research program. Theory, Culture and Society 20(2): 1–33.
Benedict XVI. 2009. Encyclical caritas in veritate. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Dahrendorf, R. 1994. The changing quality of citizenship. In The condition of citizenship, ed. B. van Steenberger, 10–19. London: Sage.
Davis, K. 1959. The myth of functional analysis as a special method in sociology and anthropology. American Sociological Review 24(6): 757–772.
Diwan, R. 2000. Relational wealth and the quality of life. Journal of Socio-Economics 29(4): 305–340.
Donati, P. 1991. Teoria relazionale della società. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Donati, P. 2000. La cittadinanza societaria. Roma/Bari: Laterza.
Donati, P. 2001. Il lavoro che emerge. Prospettive del lavoro come relazione sociale in una economia dopo-moderna. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Donati, P. 2003. Giving and social relations: The culture of free giving and its differentiation today. International Review of Sociology 13(2): 243–272.
Donati, P., and L. Tronca. 2008. Il capitale sociale degli italiani. Le radici familiari, comunitarie e associative del civismo, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Donati, P. 2008. Discovering the relational character of the common good. In Pursuing the common good: How solidarity and subsidiarity can work together, ed. M.S. Archer and P. Donati, 659–683. Vatican: PASS.
Donati, P. 2009. Welfare e globalizzazione: fra mercificazione e demercificazione. Studi di Sociologia 47(1): 3–31.
Donati, P. 2011. Reflexivity after modernity: From the viewpoint of relational sociology. In Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences, ed. P. Donati, 192–210. London/New York: Routledge.
Gotti Tedeschi, Ettore. 2005. Denaro e Paradiso. Casale Monferrato: Edizioni Piemme.
Gotti Tedeschi, Ettore. 2007. Spiriti Animali. La concorrenza giusta. Milano: Università Bocconi Editore.
Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Italian translation: 1986. Teoria dell’agire comunicativo, vol. 2. Bologna: il Mulino.
Lockwood, D. 1992. Social integration and system integration. In Solidarity and schism. ‘the problem of disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxist sociology, ed. D. Lockwood, 399–412. Oxford: Clarendon.
Lockwood, D. 1999. Civic integration and social cohesion. In Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration, ed. I. Gough and G. Olofsson, 63–84. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Italian translation: 1990. Sistemi sociali. Fondamenti di una teoria generale. Bologna: il Mulino.
Luhmann, N. 1997a. Limits of steering. Theory, Culture and Society 14(1): 41–57.
Luhmann, N. 1997b. Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society? International Review of Sociology 7(1): 67–80.
Luhmann, N. 1998. Politics and economy. Thesis Eleven 53: 1–10.
Milano, Riccardo. 2010. Finanza islamica e finanza etica. Il denaro al servizio dell’uomo. newsletter@benecomune.net.
Sinn, H.W. 2010. Casino capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soros, G. 2000. Reflexivity in financial markets. In Open Society. Reforming global capitalism, ed. G. Soros, 58–90. New York: Public Affairs.
Spaemann, R. 2008. Rousseau. Mensch oder Bürger. Das Dilemma der Moderne. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Italian translation: 2009. Rousseau cittadino senza patria. Dalla ‘polis’ alla natura. Milano: Edizioni Ares.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donati, P. (2012). Beyond the Market/State Binary Code: The Common Good as a Relational Good. In: Schlag, M., Mercado, J. (eds) Free Markets and the Culture of Common Good. Ethical Economy, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2990-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2990-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2989-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2990-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)