Skip to main content

Beyond the Market/State Binary Code: The Common Good as a Relational Good

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Free Markets and the Culture of Common Good

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 41))

Abstract

Donati is one of the best known Italian authors on social sciences. He is a professor at the University of Bologna and member of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. He has written over 90 books, which have influenced parts of the encyclical Caritas in Veritate. His main theory is the ‘relational configuration of society’ which he here applies to economy. We are very proud of having won him for our project. In his essay he elaborates on the statement of Caritas in Veritate, that the exclusively binary model of State-market is corrosive of society (Benedict XVI. 2009. Encyclical Caritas in veritate. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.). He shows that, in order to go beyond the present domination of the binomial market-State (lib-lab in Donati’s language), which destroys sociality, we need much more than good, honest and altruistic individuals: we need a societal configuration able to generate relational goods. Relational good is the name of the common good in a highly differentiated and globalised society. His theory is innovative and can be considered to be of great interest for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is certainly remarkable that Catholic anthropology has been associated with the Islamic Ummah on the grounds that Islamic finance is reported to use money only as a means and not as a goal, which would explain why Islamic financial institutions were able to avoid being crashed by the world crisis of September 2008 (cf. Milano 2010).

  2. 2.

    As I have described and analysed the lib-lab set-up in many works, I simply have to refer to here: cf. Donati (2000, 2001, 2009).

  3. 3.

    For a more detailed analysis cf. Donati (2000, 229–260), Donati (2001, 202–227).

  4. 4.

    A champion of this approach, Ralph Dahrendorf (1994) sees citizenship as a gift granted (octroyée) by an enlightented political élite, including entitlements guaranteed by the State versus other provisions offered by the free market.

  5. 5.

    I am using the phrase ‘social integration’ here to distinguish it from ‘systemic integration’ (Lockwood 1992, 1999).

  6. 6.

    The well-known expression was first proposed by J. Habermas (1981), who deals with such pathologies in terms of communicative forms and not as a more complex problem. At the cultural level it has been employed by Charles Taylor.

  7. 7.

    The term ‘economic’ here is used in an analytical generalised sense: cf. Donati (1991, Chap. 4).

  8. 8.

    On the issue of finance ethics, see Gotti Tedeschi (2005, 2007).

  9. 9.

    In the AGIL terms, the Adaptation function prevails on the Latency function.

  10. 10.

    On a critique of the reflexive modernisation theory: cf. Archer (2007), Donati (2011).

  11. 11.

    I take it that modernity corresponds to a society spirit and model of a functional type (as has been clarified very well by Niklas Luhmann’s own theory). I see functionalism as the root of the ­scientific-technological approach typical of the West and of Western modernity, as Davis (1959) described it.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Diwan (2000) and Donati (2009).

  13. 13.

    As an indicator that a lib-lab configuration is prevailing in the USA too (and not only in Europe), it can be reminded that 97% of the private debt in the States passes through the State (Sinn 2010, Chap. 11).

  14. 14.

    I am referring to individual A, G, I, L sub-systems with the institutions thereof.

  15. 15.

    J. J. Rousseau’s works, for instance, provide a paradigmatic example of this position, which has justified an apolitical individualism and at the same time State dictatorships within modernity (cf. Spaemann 2009).

Bibliography

  • Archer, M.S. 2000. Being human. The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2007. Essere umani. Il problema dell’agire, ed. Prandini, R. Genova-Milano: Marietti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.S. 2003. Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2006. La conversazione interiore. Come nasce l’agire sociale. Trento: Edizioni Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.S. 2007. Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Italian translation: 2009. Riflessività umana e percorsi di vita. Come la soggettività umana influenza la mobilità sociale. Trento: Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.S. 2009. L’enciclica di Benedetto provoca la teoria sociale. Vita e Pensiero XCII 5: 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.S. (ed.). 2010. Conversations about reflexivity. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press. Italian translation: 1999. Modernizzazione riflessiva. Trieste: Asterios.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. The theory of reflexive modernization. Problematic, hypotheses and research program. Theory, Culture and Society 20(2): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. 2009. Encyclical caritas in veritate. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. 1994. The changing quality of citizenship. In The condition of citizenship, ed. B. van Steenberger, 10–19. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. 1959. The myth of functional analysis as a special method in sociology and anthropology. American Sociological Review 24(6): 757–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diwan, R. 2000. Relational wealth and the quality of life. Journal of Socio-Economics 29(4): 305–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 1991. Teoria relazionale della società. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2000. La cittadinanza societaria. Roma/Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2001. Il lavoro che emerge. Prospettive del lavoro come relazione sociale in una economia dopo-moderna. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2003. Giving and social relations: The culture of free giving and its differentiation today. International Review of Sociology 13(2): 243–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P., and L. Tronca. 2008. Il capitale sociale degli italiani. Le radici familiari, comunitarie e associative del civismo, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2008. Discovering the relational character of the common good. In Pursuing the common good: How solidarity and subsidiarity can work together, ed. M.S. Archer and P. Donati, 659–683. Vatican: PASS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2009. Welfare e globalizzazione: fra mercificazione e demercificazione. Studi di Sociologia 47(1): 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2011. Reflexivity after modernity: From the viewpoint of relational sociology. In Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences, ed. P. Donati, 192–210. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotti Tedeschi, Ettore. 2005. Denaro e Paradiso. Casale Monferrato: Edizioni Piemme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotti Tedeschi, Ettore. 2007. Spiriti Animali. La concorrenza giusta. Milano: Università Bocconi Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Italian translation: 1986. Teoria dell’agire comunicativo, vol. 2. Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, D. 1992. Social integration and system integration. In Solidarity and schism. ‘the problem of disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxist sociology, ed. D. Lockwood, 399–412. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, D. 1999. Civic integration and social cohesion. In Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration, ed. I. Gough and G. Olofsson, 63–84. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Italian translation: 1990. Sistemi sociali. Fondamenti di una teoria generale. Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1997a. Limits of steering. Theory, Culture and Society 14(1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1997b. Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society? International Review of Sociology 7(1): 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1998. Politics and economy. Thesis Eleven 53: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milano, Riccardo. 2010. Finanza islamica e finanza etica. Il denaro al servizio dell’uomo. newsletter@benecomune.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.W. 2010. Casino capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros, G. 2000. Reflexivity in financial markets. In Open Society. Reforming global capitalism, ed. G. Soros, 58–90. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, R. 2008. Rousseau. Mensch oder Bürger. Das Dilemma der Moderne. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Italian translation: 2009. Rousseau cittadino senza patria. Dalla ‘polis’ alla natura. Milano: Edizioni Ares.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierpaolo Donati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donati, P. (2012). Beyond the Market/State Binary Code: The Common Good as a Relational Good. In: Schlag, M., Mercado, J. (eds) Free Markets and the Culture of Common Good. Ethical Economy, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2990-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics