Skip to main content

Breeding for Improved Drought Tolerance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crop Production for Agricultural Improvement

Abstract

The combination of a changing global climate and an increasing world population requires that crops for food, fibre and fuel need to be more resilient to hotter and drier conditions than they have been in the past. Given the years required to develop and release new varieties, breeders have been working hard to achieve this goal. Various strategies being used to counteract drought stress and some examples of successes will be reviewed. These include improvements in maize yield stability, due in part to improved drought tolerance; new varieties of wheat with increased water use efficiency; upland rice with deeper roots, and pearl millet with better yields in arid areas. While most of the selections are based simply on yield, greater emphasis is being placed on morpho-physiological traits associated with greater stress tolerance. Molecular markers based on QTLs linked to these traits also have been used, although less than the number of papers published in this area would suggest. There is promise in candidate genes that have been highlighted by ‘omic studies, and great hope has been placed on transgenic approaches, but few of these have yet borne fruit in the field. The rapidly advancing genomic technologies and ready access to cheap sequence data are accelerating the breeding process. However, the ability to obtain relevant, high quality phenotypic information is the rate-limiting process; new innovations in ‘high-throughput’ phenotyping may provide solutions. Improved characterisation of test environments in multi-location trials combined with advanced statistical dissection of G x E interactions is helping breeders to improve target varieties. The use of models for predicting gene effects, particularly when combining multiple traits, will find greater application as these tools are developed further. Teams of breeders, physiologists, molecular geneticists, agronomists, pathologists, modellers and statisticians, who can communicate across disciplines, are required to tackle the challenge of producing enough food in a world where production is often constrained by insufficient water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdollahian Noghabi AM, Mohammadian R (2005) Study of relationship of morphological and physiological characteristics of sugar beet with drought tolerance. Research final report (in Persian), Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Iran, 80pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Araus JL, Sanchez C, Cabrera-Bosquet L (2010) Is heterosis in maize mediated through better water use? New Phytol 187:392–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M (2010) Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv 28:169–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bänziger M, Laffite HR (1997) Efficiency of secondary traits for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Sci 37:1110–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker T, Campos H, Cooper M, Dolan D, Edmeades G, Habben J, Schussler J, Wright D, Zinselmeier C (2004) Improving drought tolerance in maize. Plant Breed Rev 25:173–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidinger FR, Serraj R, Rizvi SMH (2005) Field evaluation of drought tolerance QTL effects on phenotype and adaptation in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] topcross hybrids. Field Crops Res 94:14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2011) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A, Pnuel Y (1990) Physiological attributes associated with drought resistance of wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. Aust J Agric Res 41:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A, Sullivan CY (1986) The comparative drought resistance of landraces of sorghum and millet from dry and humid regions. Ann Bot 57:835–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer JS, James RA, Munns R, Condon TG, Passioura JB (2008) Osmotic adjustment leads to anomalously low estimates of relative water content in wheat and barley. Funct Plant Biol 35:1172–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce WB, Edmeades GO, Barker TC (2002) Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 53:13–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglioni P, Warner D, Bensen RJ (2008) Bacterial RNA chaperones confer abiotic stress tolerance in plants and improved grain yield in maize under water-limited conditions. Plant Physiol 147:446–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Mare C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res 105:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen THH, Murata N (2011) Glycinebetaine protects plants against abiotic stress: mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Env 34(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank A, Dowkiw A, Wright G, Rachaputi NC, Nigam S (2004) Heritability of drought-resistance traits in peanut. Proceedings of the 4th international crop science congress. 26 September–1 October, 2004, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades GO, Baeziger M, Ribaut J (2000) Maize improvement for drought-limited environments. In: Otegui ME, Slafer GA (eds) Physiological basis for maize improvement. Food Products Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury D, Jefferies S, Kuchel H, Langridge P (2010) Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot 61:3211–3222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukai S, Pantuwan G, Jongdee B (1999) Screening for drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res 64:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N (2010) Food: inside the hothouses of industry. Nature 466:548–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer G, Cooper M, Tardieu F, Welch S, Walsh B, van Eeuwijk F, Chapman S, Podlich D (2006) Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci 11:1360–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He YX, Zheng TQ, Hao XB (2010) Yield performances of japonica introgression lines selected for drought tolerance in a BC breeding programme. Plant Breed 129:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd EA (1971) Can we breed for drought resistance? In: Larson KL, Eastin JD (eds) Drought injury and resistance in crops. CSSA Special Publication. No. 2. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain SS (2006) Molecular breeding for abiotic stress tolerance: drought perspective. Proc Pakistan Acad Sci 43:189–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna-Chopra R, Sinha SK (1988) Enhancement of drought-induced senescence by the reproductive sink in fertile lines of wheat and sorghum. Ann Bot 61:649–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kholov J, Hash CT, Kakkera A (2010) Constitutive water-conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). J Exp Bot 61:369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Venuprasad R, Atlin GN (2007) Genetic analysis of rainfed lowland rice drought tolerance under naturally-occurring stress in eastern India: heritability and QTL effects. Field Crops Res 103:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43:107–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Env 33:453–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra J (2001) Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Curr Sci 80:758–763

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morison JIL, Baker NR, Mullineaux PM, Davies WJ (2008) Improving water use in crop production. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 363:639–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Clark CJA, Le Bloa M, Royal A, Jaggard KW, Pidgeon JD (2004) Assessing the genetic resources to improve drought tolerance in sugar beet. Agronomic traits of diverse genotypes under droughted and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Res 90:213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Le Bloa M, Clark CJA, Royal A, Jaggard KW, Pidgeon JD (2005) Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crops Res 91:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Clark CJAC, Perry A (2010) Traits related to genotypic differences in effective water use and drought tolerance in UK winter wheat. Asp Appl Biol 105:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1995) Alterations in lipid composition, lipid peroxidation and anti-oxidative protection during senescence in drought stressed plants and non-drought stressed plants of Pisum sativum. Plant Physiol Biochem 33:547–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J (2007) The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot 58:113–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura JB, Angus JF (2010) Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 106:37–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlich DW, Winkler CR, Cooper M (2004) Mapping as you go: an effective approach for marker-assisted selection of complex traits. Crop Sci 44:1560–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praba ML, Cairns JE, Babu RC, Lafitte HR (2009) Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 195:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi A (2006) Carbon isotope discrimination and selective breeding for drought tolerance in sugar beet. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi A, Ober ES, Griffiths H, Pidgeon JD, Kromdijk W (2008) Genetic characteristics of water-use related traits in sugar beet. Euphytica 160:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi A, Ober E, Griffiths H (2009) Genotypic variation for water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination, and potential surrogate measures in sugar beet. Field Crops Res 112:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds M, Tuberosa R (2008) Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds M, Dreccer F, Trethowan R (2007) Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. J Exp Bot 58:177–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds M, Manes Y, Izanloo A, Langridge P (2009) Phenotyping approaches for physiological breeding and gene discovery in wheat. Ann Appl Biol 155:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RA (2006) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manage 80:197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Watt M, Condon AG, Spielmeyer W, Dolferus R (2010) Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Funct Plant Biol 37:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle AA, Hamblin J (1981) Theoretical aspects for selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci 21:943–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, Nguyen HT (2004) Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot 55:2343–2351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F, Tuberosa R (2010) Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venuprasad R, Lafitte HR, Atlin GN (2007) Response to direct selection for grain yield under drought stress in rice. Crop Sci 47:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav OP (2008) Performance of landraces, exotic elite populations and their crosses in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in drought and non-drought conditions. Plant Breed 127:208–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav OP (2010) Drought response of pearl millet landrace-based populations and their crosses with elite composites. Field Crops Res 118:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav OP, Bhatnagar SK (2001) Evaluation of indices for identification of pearl millet cultivars adapted to stress and non-stress conditions. Field Crops Res 70:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav OP, Weltzien E (2000) Differential response of landrace-based populations and high yielding varieties of pearl millet in contrasting environments. Ann Arid Zone 39:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RS, Sehgal D, Vadez V (2011) Using genetic mapping and genomics approaches in understanding and improving drought tolerance in pearl millet. J Exp Bot 62:397–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M, Paroda RS (1982) Impact of biparental mating on correlation coefficients in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 62:337–343

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sugar beet work at Rothamsted was supported by the British Beet Research Organisation, KWS, Strube and Südzucker, and work on wheat by DEFRA through the Sustainable Arable LINK programme (LK0986), with contributions from HGCA, KWS UK, RAGT, and Limagrain. SBSI is supported by the Iranian Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abazar Rajabi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rajabi, A., Ober, E.S. (2012). Breeding for Improved Drought Tolerance. In: Ashraf, M., Öztürk, M., Ahmad, M., Aksoy, A. (eds) Crop Production for Agricultural Improvement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4116-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics