Abstract
This chapter is the second of two that respond to the third of our general questions about how housing assets, if systematically used, might perform as a pension. The specific objective is to identify and evaluate the lessons to be learned from international experience. A number of societies beyond Europe have long been reliant on home ownership as a supplement for, or even the basis of, pension income. Specifically, the focus here is on developed East Asian societies – Japan, Korea and Singapore – which have reached, or even surpassed, the economic status of some European societies. Whereas elements of their approach to welfare bear some similarity to that in Europe, there are also important differences of emphasis. They have been resistant to the building up of welfare states and citizenship rights, placing considerable emphasis on the responsibilities of the family. Supporting this, housing policy and advancing home ownership have played an important part in both the economic success of these countries and in supporting universal living standards. In some respects, then, they have been forerunners of property asset-based welfare approaches, the experience of which may inform European thinking about different welfare futures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bonoli, G., & Shinkawa, T. (2005). Population ageing and the logics of pension reform in Western Europe, East Asia and North America. In G. Bonoli & T. Shinkawa (Eds.), Ageing and pension reform around the world: Evidence from eleven countries. Cheltenham: Edwin Elgar.
Chua, B. H. (2003). Maintaining housing values under the condition of universal homeownership. Housing Studies, 18(3), 765–780.
Doling, J., & Ronald, R. (2011). Meeting the income needs of older people in east Asia: Using housing equity. Ageing and Society, 31, 2011.
Forrest, R., & Hirayama, Y. (2009). The uneven impact of neo-liberalism on housing opportunities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(4), 998–1013.
Groves, R., Murie, A., & Watson, C. (2007). Housing and the new welfare state: Examples from east Asia and Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hirayama, Y. (2003). Housing policy and social inequality in Japan. In M. Izuhara (Ed.), Comparing social policies: Exploring new perspectives in Britain and Japan. Bristol: Polity Press.
Hirayama, Y. (2010). The role of home ownership in Japan’s aged society. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(2), 213–226.
Hirayama, Y., & Ronald, R. (2007). Housing and social transition in Japan. London: Routledge.
Hirayama, Y., & Ronald, R. (2008). Baby boomers, Baby busters and the Lost Generation: Generational Fractures in Japan’s Homeowner Society. Urban and Policy Review, 26(4).
Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48, 706–723.
Izuhara, M. (2007). Turning stock into cash flow: Strategies using housing assets in an ageing society. In Y. Hirayama & R. Ronald (Eds.), Housing and social transition in Japan. London: Routledge.
Johnson, C. A. (1982). Miti and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle.
Jones, C. (1993). The pacific challenge: Confucian welfare states. In C. Jones (Ed.), New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe. London: Routledge.
Kasza, G. J. (2006). One world of welfare: Japan in comparative perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
KNHC (Korean National Housing Corporation). (2009). Yearbook on housing and urban statistics. Seoul: KNHC.
Lim, K. L. (2001). Implications of Singapore’s CPF scheme on consumption choices and retirement. Pacific Economic Review, 6, 361–382.
McCarthy, D., Mitchell, O. S., & Piggott, J. (2002). Asset rich and cash poor: Retirement provision and housing policy in Singapore. Journal of pension Economics and Finance, 1, 197–222.
Park, S. Y. (2007). The state of housing policy in Korea. In R. Groves, A. Murie, & C. Watson (Eds.), Housing and the new welfare state: Examples from east Asia and Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Park, B.-H., & Lee, H.-O. (2007). A comparative study on housing welfare policies for the elderly between Korea and Japan – Focused on the elderly who can live independently. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(1), 90–103.
Peng, I., & Wong, J. (2004, September 2–4). Growing out of the developmental state: East Asian welfare reform in the 1990s. RC19 annual conference: Welfare state restructuring: Processes and social outcomes, Paris.
Phang, S. Y. (2007). The Singapore model of housing and the welfare state. In R. Groves, A. Murie, & C. Watson (Eds.), Housing and the new welfare state: Examples from east Asia and Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Ronald, R. (2007). Comparing homeowner societies: Can we construct an east-west model? Housing Studies, 22(4), 473–493.
Ronald, R., & Chiu, R. H. L. (2010). Changing housing policy landscapes in Asia Pacific. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(3), 223–231.
Ronald, R., & Doling, J. (2010). Shifting east Asian approaches to homeownership and the housing welfare pillar. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(3).
Ronald, R., & Hirayama, Y. (2006). Housing commodities, context and meaning: Transformations in Japan’s urban condominium sector. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2467–2483.
Ronald, R., & Jin, M. Y. (2010). Home ownership in South Korea: Examining sector underdevelopment. Urban Studies, 47(10).
Sato, I. (2007). Welfare regime theories and the Japanese housing system. In Y. Hirayama & R. Ronald (Eds.), Housing and social transition in Japan. London: Routledge.
Shinkawa, T. (2005). The politics of pension reform in Japan: Institutional legacies, credit claiming and blame avoidance. In G. Bonoli & T. Shinkawa (Eds.), Ageing and pension reform around the world: Evidence from eleven countries. Cheltenham: Edwin Elgar.
U.N. (2005). http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WUP2005/2005wup.htm. Accessed 1 June 2010.
Weiss, L. (2003). Guiding globalisation in east Asia: New roles for old developmental states. In L. Weiss (Ed.), States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back in (pp. 245–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yap, M. T. (2002). Employment insurance: A safety net for the unemployed, Institute of Policy Studies. Report Prepared for the Remaking Singapore Committee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doling, J., Elsinga, M. (2013). Lessons from East Asia. In: Demographic Change and Housing Wealth:. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4384-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4384-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4383-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4384-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)