Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Exactly Was Torricelli’s “Barometer?”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science in the Age of Baroque

Abstract

What exactly was Evangelista Torricelli up to when, in 1644, he took mercury filled tubes and turned them upside down in other mercury filled tubs? A canonical story anchored by the larger historiographical edifice of the “Scientific Revolution” holds that Torricelli was using a new instrumental experimental approach to natural philosophy to demonstrate and measure the weight of atmospheric air. Within this frame, Torricelli’s mercury esperienza as he called it heralds the birth of modern experimental science through his invention of the first modern barometer. This paper questions this traditional narrative by re-interpreting the archival foundations upon which this account is based. In particular, it stresses the gaps between the rather slim documentary record of Torricelli’s work and the canonical interpretation of it built by the “Scientific Revolution” literature. It also uses other documentary contexts available in the same archive to give a different, though insistently historical, account of Torricelli’s motivations for and conceptualization of his labors. The paper does not conclude by claiming a new and definitive revisionist interpretation of Torricelli’s mercury esperienza, but by suggesting instead that the emphatically historical but also interpretively flexible approach to Torricelli’s work pursued in this paper exemplifies a “Baroque” approach to the history of science, one that can be useful in generating fresh interpretive insights about the early history of modern science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 1612. Il Vocabolario degli Accademici della Crusca. Venice: Alberti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accolti, Pietro. 1625. Lo Inganno degl’occhi, Prospettiva pratica di Pietro Accolti gentilhuomo fiorentino. Florence: Pietro Cecconcelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2007. Infancy and history: On the destruction of experience (trans: Heron, Liz). London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, Leon Battista. 1980. Ludi mattematici. Parma: Guanda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Kirsti. 2007. The geometry of an art: The history of the mathematical theory of perspective from Alberti to Monge. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1999. The New Atlantis. In Francis Bacon: Selected philosophical works, ed. Rose-Mary Sargent. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, Salvatore. 1961. Grande Dizionario della Lingua Italiana, 20 vols. Turin: Unione Tipografico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, Hans. 2011. Florence and Baghdad Renaissance Art and Arab Science, (trans: Schneider, Debarah Lucas) Cambridge, MA: Belking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 2009. The origin of German tragic drama (trans: John Osborne). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with objects. The transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, Mario. 1993. Galileo courtier. The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Henk J.M. 2001. Redefining geometrical exactness: Descartes’ transformation of the early modern concept of construction. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Henk J.M. 2004. Philosophical challenges from history of mathematics. In New trends in the history and philosophy of mathematics, ed. Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen, Stig Andur Pedersen, and Lise Marianne Sonne-Hansen, 51–66. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschiero, Luciano. 2007. Experiment and natural philosophy in seventeenth-century Tuscany: The history of the Accademia del Cimento. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, Horst. 2001. Gazing hands and blind spots: Galileo as draftsman. Science in Context 14: 153–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, Horst. 2007. Galilei der Künstler: Die Zeichnung, der Mond, die Sonne. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerota, Filippo. 2010. Linear perspective in the age of galileo: Ludovico Cigoli’s Prospettiva pratica. Florence: Leo Olschiki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Stuart. 2009. Vanities of the eye: Vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H.Floris. 1994. The scientific revolution: A historiographical inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damisch, Hubert. 1994. The origin of perspective (trans: Goodman, John). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damisch, Hubert. 2002. A theory of /Cloud/. Toward a history of painting (trans: Lloyd, Janet). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dati, Carlo. 1663. Lettere a Filaleti di Timauro Antiate, Della vera storia della Cicloide, e della famosissima esperienza dell’argento vivo, 24 Gennaio 1662. Florence: All’Insegna della Stella.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and experience. The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gandt, François (ed.). 1987. L’Oeuvre de Torricelli: Science Galiléenne et nouvelle géometrie. Nice: La Lambrusque.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waard, Cornelis. 1936. L’Expérience barométrique, ses antecedents et ses explications. Thouars: Deux-Sevres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, Samuel Y. 1984. Galileo, Florentine “disegno,” and the “strange spottednesse” of the moon. Art Journal 44(1): 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, Samuel Y. 2009. The mirror, the window, and the telescope: How Renaissance linear perspective changed our vision of the universe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, James. 1996. The poetics of perspective. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula. 1993. Controlling the experiment: Rhetoric, court patronage, and the experimental method of Francesco Redi. History of Science 31: 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula. 1996. Possessing nature: Museums, collecting, and scientific culture in early modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010. Baroque optics and the disappearance of the observer. Journal of the History of Ideas 71(2): 191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galluzzi, Paolo. 1980. Il Mecenatismo Mediceo e le Scienze. In Idee, Istituzioni, Scienza, ed Arti nella Firenze dei Medici, ed. C. Vasoli. Florence: Giunti Mantelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galluzzi, Paolo (ed.). 2001. Scienziati a Corte; l’arte della sperimentazione nell’Accademia Galileiana del Cimento. Livorno: Sillabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivins, William M. 1938. On the rationalization of sight; with an examination of three Renaissance texts on perspective. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Martin. 1994. Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, Martin. 1992. The science of art: Optical themes in Western art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, Athanasius. 1650. Musurgia universalis sive Ars magna consoni et dissoni in X libros digesta. Rome: Francesco Corbelletti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles Middleton, W.E. 1964. The history of the barometer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, David C. 1976. Theories of vision from Al-kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, Emmanuel. 1653. Cursus philosophicus concinnatus ex notissimis cuique principiis, ac praesertim quod res physicus instauratas ex lege Naturae sensatis experimentis passim comprobata. Toulouse: R. Bosc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffioli, Cesare S. 1994. Out of Galileo: The science of waters, 1628–1718. Rotterdam: Erasmus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mali, Joseph. 2003. Mythistory: The making of a modern historiography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, Paolo, and Enzio Vailati. 1991. Torricelli’s infinitely long solid and its philosophical reception in the seventeenth century. Isis 82: 50–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, Alex. 2011. Between Raphael and Galileo: Mutio Oddi and the mathematical culture of late Renaissance Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazauric, Simone. 1998. Pascal, Gassendi, et le problème du vide. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersenne, Marin. 1647. Novarum observatorum physico-matheticarum. Paris: Bertier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersenne, Marin. 1977. In Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, religieux minime, 16 vols, ed. Mme Paul Tannery, Cornélis de Waard, and René Pintard. Paris: Centre National Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monconys, Balthazar de. 1665. Journal des voyages de M. de Monconys, 3 vols. Lyon: Boissat & Remeus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Jane O. 2011. Benjamin’s Library: Modernity, Nation and the Baroque. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niçeron, Jean-François. 1638. La perspective curieuse, ou La magie articielle des effets merveilleux de l’optique par la vision directe. Paris: P. Billiane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, Pierre. 1647. Observation touchant le vuide faite pour la première fois en France, contenue en une letter écrite à Monsieur Chanut … par Monsieur Petit le 10 novembre 1646. Avec le discours qui en esté imprimé Pologne sur le mesme sujet en juillet 1647. Paris: Sebastien et Gabriel Cramoisy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Eileen. 1997. Painting the heavens: Art and science in the age of Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirion, Jean. 1907–1908. “Pascal, l’horreur du vide et la pression atmospherique.” Revue des questions scientifiques. XII: 383–450, XIII: 149–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribby, Jay. 1991. Dante’s restaurant: The cultural work of experiment in early Tuscany. In The consumption of culture: 1600–1800, ed. Ann Bermingham and John Brewer. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribby, Jay. 1994. Club medici: Natural experiment and the imagineering of ‘Tuscany’. Configurations 2(2): 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, Louis. 2010. In De Torricelli à Pascal, ed. Simone Mazauric. Philosophiae Scientiae 14: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, Michael. 1991. In the wake of Galileo. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessa, Mirella. 1991. La Crusca e le crusche: il vocabolario e la lessicografia italiana del Sette-Ottocento. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 1994. The social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Pamela. 2004. The body of the Artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torricelli, Evangelista. 1919–1944. In Opere di Evangelista Torricelli, 4 vols. in 5, ed. Gino Loria and Giuseppe Vassura. Faenza: G. Montaeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torricelli’s Barometric Experiment. Virtual Museum of the Museo Galileo. http://catalogue.museogalileo.it/multimedia/TorricellisBarometricExperimentText.html

  • Veltmann, Kim. 1986. Leonardo da Vinci studies I: Linear perspective and the visual dimensions of science and art. Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, William. 1984. Galileo and his sources: The heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi, Niccoló. 1648. Experimenta vulgata non vacuum probare, sed plenum et antiperistasim instabilire. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    J. B. Shank

Authors
  1. J. B. Shank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. B. Shank .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Unit for History & Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, New South Wales, Australia

    Ofer Gal

  2. , Unit for Interdisciplinary Studies, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel

    Raz Chen-Morris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shank, J.B. (2012). What Exactly Was Torricelli’s “Barometer?”. In: Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (eds) Science in the Age of Baroque. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 208. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation