Abstract
The religious Zionist collective in Israel combines modern habitus with life according to the strict Jewish law (Halacha). The constant efforts to combine the two do not prevent anxieties in regard to its very survival, stemming from the embeddedness in the nonreligious collective and close contacts with it. This chapter looks into one of the major loci of concern – the moral of the Jewish family – as inculcated to teenage girls in a special class on “education for family life” called Kedusha (holiness class).
The ethnographic research was carried out in a class which took place in a religious boarding school for girls. The article ethnography depicts the production of attractive, up-to-date pedagogy directed at motivating the adolescent girls, to internalize the normative Jewish ideal of womanhood, sexuality, and family life. It reveals two major practices used in the classes – “Modeling and Deconstruction of Modern Discourses.” Both practices dismantle and invalidate secularism and modernity while simultaneously co-opting modern, secular themes in the construction and reproduction of religious womanhood. Anticipating marriage and childbearing, the students tend to the embrace the messages conveyed by the teachers about religious Jewish womanhood and motherhood, expressing little resistance to their ideal representation by the teacher.
The article is an adaptation of the original version published in Megamot 1999 (a journal in Hebrew), vol., 39, pp. 492–516.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Using standard parentheses ( ) indicates textual omission in order to shorten the text, the use of square parentheses [ ] is meant to explain local idioms and connotations in Hebrew.
- 2.
The ZR collective is consisted of various subsectors that differ, sometimes substantially, in their religious and ideological interpretations of nationality, Jewishness, and Israeliness, as well as in their attitudes toward the “secular” and the “religious ultra-Orthodox” collectives. However, in the Israeli state education system, the subsectors – called state-religious educational system in contrast to the state education system – are treated and considered as one body.
- 3.
The terms “secularity” and “secular people” are used in the ZR discourse. However, as in Israel state and religiosity are conflated the term “nonreligious” is used when the text does not refer to this discourse. The terms modernity, moderna, and modernism are used interchangeably in the ZR discourse.
- 4.
The concept “Kedusha,” holiness in English, is abstract and charged with different and diversified meanings. Calling a lesson “Kedusha” signifies that the study of sexuality, womanhood, and family life is a holy task. The opposite of Kedusha is secularity (“Hulin” in Hebrew).
- 5.
The study of holiness class is part of a larger research project on girlhood, including religious girlhood in the Ulpana.
- 6.
In Israel today, there are more than 60 new and old Ulpanot (including in the occupied territories), most of them operate as half or full boarding schools. They serve girls’ populations who differ in their ethnic, racial, and sociocultural background. The Ulpanot call the class on family life in different names, yet, to the best of our knowledge, only the Ulpana studied named it “holiness class.”
- 7.
Israeli borders from 1948 to 1967.
- 8.
In the first phase of the research, a religious educator-researcher joined the research for a short time in order to discuss the observations made about the ZR educational process.
- 9.
At the time of the research in the mid-1990s, the ZR educational system was much more open than today to let nonreligious researchers in their schools. However, in the last decade these researchers (and I personally) experience the closing of these doors due to the escalating mutual suspicion and growing fissure between the “camps.”
- 10.
Rabbi Akiva is a central rabbinical figure in the Babylonian Talmud, who has become a key cultural hero in Judaism; the righteous Rachel was his wife.
- 11.
The collection of ancient Jewish writings that forms the basis of Jewish religious law.
- 12.
In portraying the character of the destructive wife, the teacher used the example of Rabbi Eliazer Ben-Erech who forgot what he studied and could not study because he listened to his wife’s advice not to leave home in order to study.
- 13.
The version told by the teacher blended two original texts that appear in the Babylonian Talmud.
- 14.
Some of the girls told in the interview they watch the soap opera “Dalas” that was highly popular in Israel at the time of the research.
- 15.
Covering the head either by a scarf or a wig is required of every Jewish religious woman after her marriage. The streams among the religious population differ in the type of cover required.
- 16.
- 17.
References
Aggleton, P., Homans, H., & Warwick, I. (1989). Health education, sexuality and AIDS. In S. Walker & L. Barton (Eds.), Politics and the processes of schooling (pp. 31–58). Philadelphia: The Open University Press.
Allen, I. (1987). Education in sex and personal relationships. London: Policy Study Institute.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Boyarin, D. (1995). The married monk: The Babylonian Aggada as an evidence to the transformation of the Babylonian Halacha. In Y. Atzmon (Ed.), A window to the life of women in Jewish societies (pp. 77–94). Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center. Hebrew.
Christian-Smith, L. K. (1988). Romancing the girl: Adolescent romance novels and the construction of femininity. In L. G. Roman & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), Becoming feminine: The politics of popular culture (pp. 76–101). London: Falmer Press.
de Rougemont, D. (1956). Love in the Western world. New York: Pantheon.
Dyer, R., Lovell, T., & McCrindle, J. (1993). Soap opera and women. In A. Gray & J. McGuigan (Eds.), Studying culture (pp. 58–74). London: Edward Arnold.
El-Or, T. (1993). Are they like their grandmothers?: A paradox of literacy in the life of Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 61–81.
El-Or, T., Halbertal, T., & Rapoport, T. (2002). Apples from the desert: Literature teachers reading through and beyond local culture. In M. Zelermayer et al. (Eds.), Female Teachers in Israel. A Feminist Perspective (216–239) Tel-Aviv: H’akibbutz H’meuhad. (Hebrew).
Fine, M. (1992). Sexuality, schooling and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. In M. Fine (Ed.), Disruptive voices – The possibilities of feminist research (pp. 31–59). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hartman, T., & Samet, B. (2007). Uncovering private discourse: Sex education in Jewish religious schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(1), 71–95.
Herpenes, G. (1978). Education to family life – How? What is the family and what is it for? B’esde Chemed 21, 18–22 (Hebrew)
Hottois, J., & Milner, N. A. (1975). The sex education controversy. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Kahane, R. (1975). Informal youth organizations – A general model. Sociological Inquiry, 45, 17–28.
Luhmann, N. (1987). Love as passion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McDermott, H. (1989). Novel and romance: The odyssey to Tom Jones. Hong Kong: Macmillan.
McRobbie, A., & Garber, J. (1991). Girl and subculture. In A. McRobbie (Ed.), Feminism and youth culture (pp. 1–16). London: Macmillan.
Ministry of Education (1983). Memo, Director of religious education. “The Youth Division”. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education. (Hebrew).
Ministry of Education. (1988). Curriculum for teaching family education of the Jewish family. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education. Hebrew.
Modlesky, T. (1982). Loving with a vengeance. New York: Methuen.
Neiterman, E., & Rapoport, T. (2009). Converting to belong: Immigration, education and nationalization among young “Russian” immigrant women. Gender and Education, 21, 173–189.
Neria, R. (1989). Facing permissiveness confusion. Beit-El: Beit El Library (Hebrew).
Rapoport, T., & Garb, Y. (1998). The experience of religious fortification: Coming-of-age of religious-Zionist young women. Gender and Education, 10(1), 5–21.
Rapoport, T., & Kahane, A. (Eds.) (2012). Between order and disorder: Informal organizations as a platform for educational and social thought. Tel-Aviv: Resling.
Rapoport, T., & Neiterman, E. (2007). A gendered religious habitus takes roots in the body of “Russian” immigrant girls in Israel. In J. Houtsonen & A. Antikainen (Eds.), Symbolic power in cultural context: Uncovering social reality (pp. 141–154). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Rapoport, T., Garb, Y., & Penso, A. (1995). Religious socialization and female subjectivity: Religious-Zionist girls in Israel. Sociology of Education, 68(1), 18–61.
Rapoport, T., Penso, A., & Halbertal, T. (1996). Girls’ experiences of artistic ambition: The voices of a religious-Zionist and a Kibbutznik. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 438–462.
Sears, T. J. (Ed.). (1992). Sexuality and the curriculum: The politics and practices of sexuality education. New York: Teachers College.
Trudell, N. B. (1993). Doing sex education: Gender politics and schooling. New York: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
Yanay, N., & Rapoport, T. (1997). From the “inspecting cloth” to the “eternity of Israel”: Ritual impurity and religious-Zionist discourse on women and nationality. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 651–664.
Young, M. (1971). Knowledge and control. London: Macmillan.
Acknowledgments
I warmly thank the girls from the Ulpana (who are now more than 30 years old) for sharing their life stories with us. Many, many thanks are extended to Gili David who worked as a research assistant. She contributed much to it by conducting interviews and observations, as well as in discussing the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rapoport, T. (2013). “Holiness Class”: “Constructing a Constructive Woman” in a Zionist Religious Ulpana . In: Gross, Z., Davies, L., Diab, AK. (eds) Gender, Religion and Education in a Chaotic Postmodern World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5270-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5270-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5269-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5270-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)