Skip to main content

Exploring Pedagogy for Autonomy in Language Education at University: Possibilities and Impossibilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competency-based Language Teaching in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 14))

Abstract

Autonomy in learning has long been part of a broad range of educational philosophies. It is currently identified as crucial to the development of lifelong learning in ‘the learning society’. Furthermore, it is often regarded as a defining trait of all sustained learning that attains long-term success. Autonomy is both a goal of higher education and an educational approach to secure that goal. The creation of the European Higher Education Area and the implementation of the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) each call for a learner-centered, meaning-based pedagogy which fosters the development of critical thinking skills. In this sense, pedagogy for autonomy becomes an indispensable element.

In this chapter, I will define how autonomy has been described in the relevant literature (definitions, broad and narrow, autonomy and independence, self-regulation and self-management). This will then be followed by an overview of its manifestations in the curriculum. Special attention will be devoted to constraints in the implementation of pedagogy for autonomy and the need to find spaces for manoeuvre. The EHEA calls for a notion of pedagogy based on the scholarship of teaching and learning (Shulman, Four-word: against the grain. In: Huber MT (ed) Balancing acts: the scholarship of teaching and learning in academic careers. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org (January 21, 2009), 2004) as a lodestar in contexts where research is mostly disciplinary and detached from teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brockett and Hiemstra (1991: 29) define self-direction as the “characteristics of an individual that predispose one toward taking primary responsibility for personal learning endeavours”.

  2. 2.

    Andragogy is the art and science of helping adults learn. As Jarvis (1985) puts it, for Knowles, education from above is pedagogy, while education of equals is andragogy.

  3. 3.

    By far the most influential and persuasive voice in self-concept theory was that of Carl Rogers. He introduced an entire system of helping built around the importance of the self. In Rogers’ view, the self is the central ingredient in human personality and personal adjustment. Rogers described the self as a social product, developing out of interpersonal relationships and striving for consistency. He maintained that there is a basic human need for positive regard both from others and from oneself. He also believed that individuals tend towards self-actualization and development so long as this is permitted and encouraged by a conducive environment (Purkey and Schmidt 1987).

  4. 4.

    In this model of identity, the upper, higher level of rationality controls the lower level of ­personality, the domain of choices, plurality and even contradictions.

  5. 5.

    Organizational autonomy support (e.g., allowing students some decision-making role in terms of classroom management issues), procedural autonomy support (e.g., offering students choices about the use of different media to present ideas), and cognitive autonomy support (e.g., affording opportunities for students to evaluate work from a self-referent standard).

  6. 6.

    See Prince (2004) for a review of the literature on active learning.

  7. 7.

    “Summarized by three P’s, our professional interest, our pragmatic responsibilities, and the ­pressures of policy. Scholarship of teaching and learning supports our individual and professional roles, our practical responsibilities to our students and our institutions, and our social and political obligations to those that support and take responsibility for higher education” (Shulman 2000: 53).

References

  • Abdal-Haqq, I. 1998. Constructivism in teacher education: Considerations for those who would link practice to theory. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED426986. (February 20, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., and K. Coate. 2005. Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Glasgow: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F., J.D. Campbell, J.I. Krueger, and K.D. Vohs. 2003. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 4: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. 2001. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berka, W., J. De Groof, and H. Pennenam (eds.). 1998. Autonomy in education. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A.E., and E.L. Deci. 2000. The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education 84: 740–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M., and S. Cuypers. 2003. Autonomy and authenticity in education. In The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education, ed. N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, and P. Standish, 326–340. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J.G., M. Carr, E. Rellinger, and M. Pressley. 1990. Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, ed. B.F. Jones and L. Idol, 53–92. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. 1988a. Moving towards autonomy. In Developing student autonomy in learning, 2nd ed, ed. D. Boud, 17–39. New York: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (ed.). 1988b. Developing student autonomy in learning, 2nd ed. New York: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H. 2000. School choice and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, R.G., and R. Hiemstra. 1991. Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A., and P. Grundy (eds.). 1988. Individualization and autonomy in language learning. ELT Documents 131. London: Modern English Publications, The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. 1996. The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, E. 1988. Autonomy and schooling. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, E. 1997. Creating citizens. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P.C. 1991. Self-direction for lifelong learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, C., and P. Murrell. 1987. Learning styles: Implications for improving educational practice. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. College Station: ASHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, M. 2001. Individual autonomy and genetic choice. In A companion to genethics, ed. J. Burley and J. Harris, 191–205. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. 1992. Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. 2002. Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 93: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, R.F. 1972. Autonomy and education. In Education and the development of reason, ed. R.F. Dearden, P.H. Hirst, and R.S. Peters, 448–465. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, R.F. 1975. Autonomy as an educational ideal. In Philosophers discuss education, ed. S.C. Brown, 3–18. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., and R. Flaste. 1995. Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 1994. Promoting self-determined education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 38(1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., A.J. Schwartz, L. Sheinman, and R.M. Ryan. 1981. An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 642–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, L. 1987. Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, L. 1992. Learning autonomy 2: Learner training for language learning. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, L. 1995. Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System 23(2): 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G., and B. Sinclair. 1989. Learning to learn English – A course in learner training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch, E. 1994. Self-access and the adult language learner. London: CILT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R., and E. Henriques. 1995. Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals 28: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franken, R. 1994. Human motivation, 3rd ed. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W.S., and R.M. Ryan. 1989. Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, K., and R. Connell. 1984. A model of children’s achievement and related self-perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 3, ed. J. Nicholls, 219–250. New York: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Jr., T.E. 1991. Autonomy and self-respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holec, E. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holec, H. 1985. On autonomy: Some elementary concepts. In Discourse and learning, ed. P. Riley, 173–190. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holec, H. (ed.). 1988. Autonomy and self-directed learning: Present fields of application. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holec, H., and I. Huttunen (eds.). 1997. L’Autonomie de l’Apprennant en langues vivantes/ Learner autonomy in modern languages. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1890. Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. 1985. The sociology of adult and continuing education. Beckenham: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Raya, M. 1998. Training learners to learn. In Aspects of modern language teaching in Europe, ed. W. Gewehr, G. Catsimali, P. Faber, M. Jiménez Raya, and A.J. Peck, 13–29. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Raya, M. 2008. Learner autonomy as an educational goal in modern languages education. In Pedagogy for autonomy in language education: Theory, practice and teacher education, ed. M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb, 3–15. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Raya, M., and T. Lamb. 2003. Dealing with diversity in the modern languages class. In Differentiation in the modern languages classroom, ed. M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb, 13–20. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Raya, M., and T. Lamb (eds.). 2008a. Pedagogy for autonomy in language education: Theory, practice and teacher education. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Raya, M., and T. Lamb. 2008b. Autonomy in foreign language education: Manifestations in the school curriculum. In Issues in pedagogy for autonomy in modern languages education, ed. M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb, 58–76. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Raya, M., T. Lamb, and F. Vieira. 2007. Pedagogy for autonomy in language education in Europe – Towards a framework for learner and teacher development. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., and R. Johnson. 1989. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P., and P. Winograd. 1985. Passive failure in reading. Journal of Reading Behaviour 17: 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D. 2002. Devoid of community: Examining conceptions of autonomy in education. Educational Theory 52(1): 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaravadivelu, B. 2001. Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly 35(4): 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, T.E., and H. Reinders (eds.). 2006. Supporting independent language learning: Issues and interventions. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeir, B. 2005. Education as liberation: The politics and techniques of lifelong learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37(3): 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M. 1999. The demands of liberal education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C.R., M.J. DiCintio, K.E. Cox, and J.C. Turner. 1995, October. Teacher and student perceptions of classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malett, S., D. Kirschenbaum, and L. Humphrey. 1983. Description and subjective evaluation of an objectively successful study improvement program. Personnel and Guidance Journal 61: 341–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J.D. 1996. Education in the mode of information: Some philosophical considerations. In Philosophy of Education 1996, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society, 276–286. Illinois: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B.L., and J.S. Whisler. 1997. The learner-centered classroom and school. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. 1997. Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 74: 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. 1998. Transformative learning and social action: A response to Inglis. Adult Education Quarterly 49(1): 70–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migletti, C.L., and C.C. Strange. 1998. Learning styles, classroom environment preferences, teaching styles, and remedial course outcomes for under prepared adults at a two-year college. Community College Review 26(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., and P. Winograd. 1990. How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, ed. B.F. Jones and L. Idol, 15–52. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, P. 1990. Managing on the edge. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, R., E. Li, W. Or, and H. Pierson. 1996. Taking control – Autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. 2001. Education, enterprise culture and the entrepreneurial self: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Educational Enquiry 2(2): 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1965. The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93(2): 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkey, W. 1988. An overview of self-concept theory for counselors. ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. (An ERIC/CAPS Digest: ED304630). http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9211/self.htm. Accessed 7 May 2010.

  • Purkey, W.W., and J. Schmidt. 1987. The inviting relationship: An expanded perspective for professional counseling. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to teach in higher education, 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinas, M.F., S.E. Kane-Johnson, and M.A. Vasil-Miller. 2008. Long-term learning, achievement tests, and learner centered instruction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8(3): 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C., and C. Cleary. 1995. Engines for education. Hillsdale/Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. 2000. From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1(1): 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. 2004. Four-word: Against the grain. In Balancing acts: the scholarship of teaching and learning in academic careers, ed. M.T. Huber. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org. Accessed 21 Jan 2009.

  • Siegel, H. 1988. Educating reason. Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou, C.R., K.C. Perencevich, M. DiCintio, and J.C. Turner. 2004. Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist 39(2): 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the language classroom – Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, F. 1998. Autonomia na Aprendizagem da Língua Estrangeira. Braga: Universidade do Minho, Centro de Estudos em Educação e Psicologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, F. 2009. Developing the scholarship of pedagogy: Pathfinding in adverse settings. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 9(2): 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker, W.L. 1995. Identity, plurality, and education. http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/95_docs/wardekker.html. Accessed 7 May 2006.

  • Wenden, A. 1991. Learner strategies for learner autonomy. New York: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A. 1986. Helping learners think about learning. English Language Teaching Journal 40(1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A., and J. Rubin (eds.). 1987. Learner strategies in language learning. New York: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. 1990. Education and the good life: Beyond the national curriculum. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., and R.L. Burden. 1996. Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. 2002. Strong autonomy and education. Educational Theory 52(1): 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. 2006. Education, autonomy and critical thinking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. 1989. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81(3): 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. 1990. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist 25: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. 1994. Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for ­education. In Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, ed. D.H. Schunk and B.J. Zimmerman, 3–21. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. 2002. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice 41(2): 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Jiménez Raya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raya, M.J. (2013). Exploring Pedagogy for Autonomy in Language Education at University: Possibilities and Impossibilities. In: Pérez Cañado, M. (eds) Competency-based Language Teaching in Higher Education. Educational Linguistics, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5386-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics