Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Crucial Role of the Supervisor in Supporting Employees’ Use of a Personal Development Plan: An Exploratory Intervention Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facilitating Learning in the 21st Century: Leading through Technology, Diversity and Authenticity

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Education and Training ((ABET,volume 5))

Abstract

When confronted with an aging population, fast-developing organizations come to realize that the employee’s continuing professional development drives business success. In order to gain competitive advantage, attracting and integrating new highly skilled workers and developing, motivating, and retaining the current workers have become crucial (Noe et al., Human resource management: gaining a competitive advantage, 6th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008). To support the professional development of their employees to a growing extent, organizations implement personal development plans (PDP). Although the evidence is scare, research results indicate positive effects on reflective learning and performance. However, the effectiveness of PDPs may depend on the presence of supporting process conditions, inherent to using a PDP. One of the supporting conditions often argued upon is the support of a supervisor. In this study, we will research the role of the supervisor in stimulating and guiding the employee’s use of a personal development plan. To research the role of the supervisor, an intervention study was conducted. During the intervention, the supervisors were trained in conducting performance interviews in which the tool takes a central role. The results suggest that employees start to reflect more because of having a supervisor who was enrolled in the training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (2004). Performance management; key strategies and practical guidelines (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, Z., Marini, A., & Desroches, B. (2005). Use of a learning portfolio for continuous professional development: A study of pharmacists in Ontario (Canada). Pharmacy Education, 5, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, J., Rogers, M., & Singleton, C. (1995). Personal education plan: A system of continuing medical education for general practitioners. Education for General Practice, 6, 342–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, D., & Roe, R. A. (2008). Individual and organizational factors in competence acquisition. In: W. Nijhof (Ed.), The learning potential of the workplace (pp. 71–96). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2006). Upward feedback and its contribution to employees’ feeling of self-determination. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18, 508–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beausaert, S., Segers, M., van der Rijt, J., Gijselaers, W. (2011a). The use of personal development plans in the workplace: A literature review. In P. van den Bossche, W. Gijselaers, & R. Milter (Eds.), Building learning experiences in a changing world, Advances in Business Education and Training III (pp. 235–265). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beausaert, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2011b). The use of a personal development plan and the undertaking of learning activities, expertise-growth, flexibility and performance: The role of supporting assessment conditions. Human Resource Development International, 14(5), 527–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beausaert, S., Segers, M., Gijselaers, W. (2011c). The personal development Plan Practice Questionnaire (PPQ): The development and validation of an instrument to assess employees’ perception of the personal development plan practice. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(4), 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L., & Bear, S. L. (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1995). Portfolio development and profiling for nurses (2nd ed.). Lancaster: Quay Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, A., Firmstone, V., Frame, J., & Bedward, J. (2007). Enhancing the benefit of continuing professional development: A randomized controlled study of personal development plans for dentists. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, A., & Leggett, M. (2004). Being wise about teaching portfolios: Exploring the barriers to their development and maintenance. Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2004/PDF/P047-jt.pdf on 20/09/2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutus, S., London, M., & Martineau, J. (1999). The impact of 360-degree feedback on planning for career development. Journal of Management Development, 18, 676–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with lisrel, prelis, and simplis. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wass, V. J. (2007). Portfolios in medical education: Why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Medical Education, 41, 1224–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (1988). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your student’s learning? Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • GITP. (2008). HR(D) in Limburgs perspectief. [HRD in Limburg, the Netherlands]

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. (2003). Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. The Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrisos, S., Illing, J. C., & Burford, B. C. (2008). Portfolio learning for foundation doctors: Early feedback on its use in the clinical workplace. Medical Education, 42, 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, P. (2005). A framework for portfolio development in postgraduate nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Chicago: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & MacKay, L. (2008). Managers’ and subordinates’ evaluations of feedback strategies: The critical contribution of voice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 919–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishments, self-evaluation and performance-related outcomes? Personnel Psychology, 48, 803–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1999). Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M., Larsen, H. H., & Thisted, L. N. (1999). Relationships between feedback and self-­development. Group & Organizational Management, 24(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M., & Sessa, V. I. (2006). Group feedback for continuous learning. Human Resource Development Review, 5, 303–329. doi:10.1177/1534484306290226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N., & Evans, L. (1997, September). Portfolio: A tool for self-directed learning at work. Paper presented at the Self-directed Learning: Past and Future Symposium, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers, N. J., Challis, M. C., Howe, A. C., & Field, N. J. (1999). Portfolios in continuing medical education effective and efficient? Medical Education, 33, 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company. (2005). The McKinsey global survey of business executives. McKinsey Quarterly (1), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, M., et al. (2003). Portfolios and assessment of competence: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), 457–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1996). Is career management related to employee development and performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., & Wilk, S. L. (1993). Investigation of the factors that influence employees’ participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2008). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. J., & Heywood, P. (2004). Portfolio use in general practice vocational training: A survey of GP registrars. Medical Education, 38, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J., Curtis, A., While, R., & Holloway, I. (1999). Practice professional development plans: General practitioners’ perspectives on proposed changes in general practice education. British Journal of General Practice, 49, 959–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. E. (2003). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 32, 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., & Rosen, M. (2010). Experts at work: Principles for developing expertise in organizations. In S. Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training and development in organizations (pp. 99–135). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saru, E. (2007). Organisational learning and HRD: How appropriate are they for small firms? Journal of European Industrial Training, 31, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Thurlings, M. (2008). The relationship between students’ perceptions of portfolio assessment practice and their approaches to learning. Educational Studies, 34(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, K. W. (1999). Reflection in action: Tools for cultivating on-the-job learning conditions. Organizational Dynamics, 27, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seng, S. H., & Seng, T. O. (1996, November 25–29). Reflective teaching and the portfolio approach in early childhood staff development. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the Educational Research Association of Singapore and the Australian Association for Research in Education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S., & Freas, A. (2004). The wild west of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2001). Long-term influences of portfolios on professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, V., Clarke, C., Iles, S., & Harden, J. (2006). Work based, lifelong learning through professional portfolios: Challenge or reward? Pharmacy Education, 6(2), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templer, A. J., & Cawsey, T. F. (1999). Rethinking career development in an era of portfolio careers. Career Development International, 4(2), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigelaar, D. E. H., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W. S., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2006). Portfolio as a tool to stimulate teachers’ reflections. Medical Teacher, 28, 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (1998). Design and validity of a portfolio instrument for professional training. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (2001). Portfolios as developmental assessment tools. International Journal of Training and Development, 5, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H., & Smith, K. (2000). Learning from portfolios: Differential use of feedback in ­portfolio construction. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisani, N. (2008). Challenges in producing a portfolio for assessment: In search of underpinning educational theories. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R., & Yarbrough, D. (1996). Portfolios: A tool for reflective thinking in teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasylyshyn, K. M. (2003). Executive coaching: An outcome study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K., & Dietz, M. (1998). Teaching portfolios: Purposes and possibilities. Teacher Educational Quarterly, 25(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Research and Development, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Tongersestraat 53, 6211 LM, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Simon Beausaert

  2. Educational Research and Development, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Mien Segers, Anniek van den Berge, Jeannette Hommes & Wim Gijselaers

Authors
  1. Simon Beausaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mien Segers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anniek van den Berge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeannette Hommes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wim Gijselaers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Beausaert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. for Educ. & Inform. Science, Venusstraat 35, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium

    Piet Van den Bossche

  2. , Dept. of Educ. Research and Developm., Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, Netherlands

    Wim H. Gijselaers

  3. The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, International Drive 100, Baltimore, 21202, Maryland, USA

    Richard G. Milter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beausaert, S., Segers, M., van den Berge, A., Hommes, J., Gijselaers, W. (2013). The Crucial Role of the Supervisor in Supporting Employees’ Use of a Personal Development Plan: An Exploratory Intervention Study. In: Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Milter, R. (eds) Facilitating Learning in the 21st Century: Leading through Technology, Diversity and Authenticity. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6137-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation