Abstract
For the uninitiated, it might seem quite obvious that research in second language acquisition is of relevance to the profession of language teaching. Yet in reality this relationship is not very clear, especially in terms of more formal approaches to second language acquisition and Chomskyan generative second language acquisition (henceforth GenSLA), in particular. From the point of view of language pedagogy, the question of what role theory should play in practice is one of continuous debate. This is not a trivial question; researchers need to isolate variables in order to investigate phenomena. In doing so, the complexity of reality is immediately compromised. Teachers, by contrast, must contend with reality in all of its complexity whether an explanation exists or not. Nevertheless, assuming that being able to explain phenomena means having a better understanding, we take the view that the more classroom instruction is underpinned by an understanding of theoretical principles, the more effective it will be. Accepting, then, that there is a role for theory, there is the added question of which theories. As noted some time ago by Stern (1983), the practice of language teaching implicates assumptions from a number of areas of inquiry ranging from language to learning, to education and to society. Clearly, even if we limit ourselves to language and learning, this still leaves us with a broad arena of research as the range of subfields within these two subjects is as diverse as it is wide.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For more discussion of the relationship between theory and practice in language teaching, see Cumming (2008) and the subsequent TESOL Symposium papers.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
See Whong (Chap. 12, this volume) for discussion of the different uses of the term ‘interface’ in generative theory.
- 6.
- 7.
Many of the test instruments used by GenSLA researchers can be found in the Instruments for Research into Second Language Learning and Teaching (IRIS) database: <http://www.iris-database.org>.
References
Baker, M. 2001. The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.
Belletti, A., E. Bennati, and A. Sorace. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–689.
Block, D. 2003. The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Brumfit, C. 1991. Applied linguistics in higher education: riding the storm. BAAL Newsletter 38: 45–49.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding theory. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cumming, A. 2008. Theory in an applied field. TESOL Quarterly 42: 285–291.
Fasold, R.W., and J. Connor-Linton. 2006. An introduction to language and linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Firth, A., and J. Wagner. 1997. On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81: 285–300.
Guasti, M.T. 2002. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Hawkins, R. 2001. Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Juffs, A. 1998. Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language sentence processing. Second Language Research 14: 406–424.
Juffs, A. 2006. Processing reduced relative vs. main verb ambiguity in English as a second language: A replication study with working memory. In Inquiries in linguistic development in honor of Lydia White, ed. R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, and P. Prevost, 213–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Katamba, F., W. O’Grady, and J. Archibald. 2011. Contemporary linguistics: An introduction, 2nd ed. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Lardiere, D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. J. Archibald. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lightbown, P. 1985. Great expectations. Second-language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics 6: 173–189.
Long, D., and J. Rothman. 2013. Generative approaches and the competing systems hypothesis: Formal acquisition to practical application. In Theoretical and pedagogical innovations in SLA and bilingualism, ed. J. Schweiter. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Piske, T., and M. Young-Scholten. 2009. Input matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Pollack, J.Y. 1989. Verb movement, universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rothman, J. 2008. Aspectual selection in adult L2 Spanish and the competing systems hypothesis: When pedagogical and linguistic rules conflict. Languages in Contrast 8: 74–106.
Rothman, J. 2010. Theoretical linguistics meets pedagogical practice: Pronominal subject use in Spanish as a second language (L2) as an example. Hispania 93: 52–65.
Schwartz, B.D. 1993. On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147–163.
Slabakova, R. 2008. Meaning in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Snyder, W. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77: 324–342.
Sorace, A., and F. Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22: 339–368.
Sorace, A., and L. Serratrice. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 1–16.
Stern, H.H. 1983. Fundamental concepts of language teaching: Historical and interdisciplinary perspectives on applied linguistics research. Oxford: OUP.
White, L. 2003. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, L. 2011. Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121: 577–590.
Whong, M. 2011. Language teaching: Linguistic theory in practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yusa, N., M. Koizumi, J. Kim, N. Kimura, S. Uchida, S. Yokoyama, N. Miura, R. Kawashima, and H. Hagiwara. 2011. Second-language instinct and instruction effects: Nature and nurture in second-language acquisition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 2716–2730.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whong, M., Gil, KH., Marsden, H. (2013). Introduction: Generative Second Language Acquisition and Language Pedagogy. In: Whong, M., Gil, KH., Marsden, H. (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom. Educational Linguistics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6361-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6362-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)