Abstract
A better appreciation of the value of ecosystem services produced on private lands opens the door to programs that offer incentives to landowners and managers for specific conservation and production practices. This chapter reviews studies of ecosystem services provided by oak woodlands in California and Spain, focusing on those that may be difficult to quantify and value, and therefore are often undervalued in decision-making processes drawing on economic analysis. We first examine how ecosystem services are defined and valued, and then review research done from an economic perspective in California ranch and Spanish dehesa oak woodlands. We conclude with a brief exploration of differences in institutions and policies that bear on oak woodland ecosystem services in these two regions. The next step in ecosystem service valuation and use in policy is to extend case studies and to undertake analyses at the regional, state, and nation-wide scales. Despite scientific advances, the need for preservation of the natural capital of oak woodlands and the many ecosystem services the woodlands provide is far from fully recognized by society. An important future policy task will be incorporating payments for provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services into agricultural, water, energy, and other policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The RECAMAN project (Valoración de la Renta y el Capital de los Montes de AndalucÃa) of the Junta de AndalucÃa, initiated in 2008, is ongoing and applies the Agroforestry Accounting System at the regional scale to measure total income and capital from the montes of AndalucÃa in Spain.
References
Allen-Diaz B, Jackson RD, Bartolome JW, Tate KW, Oates LG (2004) Long-term grazing study in spring-fed wetlands reveals management tradeoffs. Cal Agric 58(3):144–148
ARB [Air Resources Board] (2006) California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, California State Assembly Bill 32. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/docs/ab32text.pdf
Arriaza Balmón M, González Arenas J, Ruiz Avilés P, Cañas Madueño JA (2002) Determinación del valor de uso de cinco espacios protegidos de Córdoba y Jaén. Rev Esp Estud Agrosoc y Pesq 196:153–172
Barry S (2011) Current findings on grazing impacts: California’s special status species benefit from grazing. Cal Cattlemen June:18–20
Bartolomé-GarcÃa TJ (1994) Denominaciones de origen y calidad. In: La agricultura y la ganaderÃa extremeñas en 1993: Caja de Extremadura
Bean MJ, Wilcove DS (1997) The private-land problem. Cons Biol 11(1):1–2
Berbel J, Mesa P (2007) Valoración del agua de riego por el método de precios quasi-hedónicos: aplicación al Guadalquivir. Econ Agrar y Recurs Natur 7(14):127–144
Berger B (2009) What owners want and governments do—evidence from the oregon experiment. Fordham Law Rev 78:1281–1331
BOE [BoletÃn Oficial del Estado] (2003). Ley 43/2003, de 21 de noviembre, de Montes. BOE núm. 280, de 22-11-2003, 41422–41442
BOE [BoletÃn Oficial del Estado] (2007a). Ley 5/2007, de 3 de abril, de la Red de Parques Nacionales. BOE num. 81, de 4 de abril de 2007:14639–14649
BOE [BoletÃn Oficial del Estado] (2007b). Ley 42/2007, de 13 de diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad. BOE num. 299, de 14 de diciembre de 2007: 51275–51327
BOE [BoletÃn Oficial del Estado] (2010). Real Decreto 1852/2009, de 4 de diciembre, por el que se establecen los criterios para subvencionar los gastos en el marco de los Programas de Desarrollo Rural cofinanciados por el Fondo Europeo AgrÃcola de Desarrollo Rural (FEADER). BOE num. 1, de 1 de enero de 2010: 3–9
BOE [BoletÃn Oficial del Estado] (2011). Real Decreto 1336/2011, de 3 de octubre, por el que se regula el contrato territorial como instrumento para promover el desarrollo sostenible del medio rural. BOE num. 239, de 4 de octubre de 2011: 104199–104206
Boyd J (2007) Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? Ecol Econ 61:716–723
Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626
Brown PL (2001) Goats used in California to prevent brush fires. New York Times 14 Oct, http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/14/us/goats-used-in-california-to-prevent-brush-fires.html. Accessed Sep 2012
Byrd KB, Rissman AR, Merenlender AM (2009) Impacts of conservation easements for threat abatement and fire management in a rural oak woodland landscape. Landscape and Urban Plann 92(2):106–116
CA-LAO [California’s Legislative Analyst’s Office] (2004) Williamson Act—Subventions for Open Space. Analysis of the Budget Bill–General Government Feb 18. http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/pubdetails.aspx?id=1147 Accessed Dec 2011
California Resources Agency (2004) Hearst ranch conservation transaction overall summary, prepared by California State Resources Agency Staff, July 12. http://resources.ca.gov/hearst_docs/overall-transaction-summary-1.pdf Accessed Sep 2012
CCX [Chicago Climate Exchange] (2009) Chicago climate exchange sustainably managed rangeland soil carbon sequestration offset project protocol. http://theccx.com/docs/offsets/CCX_Sustainably_Managed_Rangeland_Soil_Carbon_Sequestration_Final.pdf. Accessed Feb 2012
Campos P (1984) EconomÃa y energÃa en la dehesa extremeña. Instituto de Estudios Agrarios, Pesqueros y Alimentarios, MAPA, Madrid: 336
Campos P (1997) Análisis de la rentabilidad económica de la dehesa. Situación. Serie de Estudios Regionales Extremadura, 111–121
Campos P (1998) Contribución de los visitantes a la conservación de Monfragüe. Bienes públicos, mercado y gestión de los recursos naturales. In: Hernández CG (ed) La dehesa: aprovechamiento sostenible de los recursos naturales. Fundación Pedro Arce y Editorial AgrÃcola Española, Madrid, pp 241–263
Campos P (1999) Alcornocales del suroeste ibérico. In: MarÃn F, Domingo J, Calzado A (eds), Los montes y su historia. Una perspectiva polÃtica, económica y social. Universidad de Huelva, Huelva:245–285
Campos P (2002) EconomÃa del uso múltiple de los Montes Propios de Jerez de la Frontera (1991–1993). Rev Esp Estud Agrosoc y Pesq 195:147–186
Campos P, Caparrós A (2006) Social and private total Hicksian incomes of multiple use forests in Spain. Ecol Econ 57:545–557
Campos P, Mariscal P (2003) Preferencias de los propietarios e intervención pública: el caso del las dehesas de la comarca de Monfragüe. Invest Agrar Sist Recu For 12(3):87–102
Campos P, Riera P (1996) Rentabilidad social de los bosques. Análisis aplicado a las dehesas y los montados ibéricos. Información Comercial Española 751:47–62
Campos P, Andrés RD, Urzainqui E, Riera P (1996) Valor económico total de un espacio de interés natural. La dehesa del área de Monfragüe. In: Azqueta D, Pérez L (eds), Gestión de espacios naturales. La demanda de servicios recreativos. McGraw-Hill, Madrid, pp 192–215
Campos P, RodrÃguez Y, Caparrós A (2001) Towards the Dehesa total income accounting: theory and operative Monfragüe study cases. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales Monográfico fuera de serie New forestlands economic accounting. Theories Appl 1:45–69
Campos P, Bonnieux F, Caparrós A, Paoli JC (2007a) Measuring total sustainable incomes from multifunctional management of corsican maritime pine and Andalusian cork oak mediterranean forests. J Envi Plan Manag 50(1):65–85
Campos P, Caparrós A, Oviedo JL (2007b) Comparing payment-vehicle effects in contingent valuation studies for recreational use in two Spanish protected forests. J Leis Res 39(1):60–85
Campos P, Daly H, Oviedo JL, Ovando P, Chebil A (2008) Accounting for single and aggregated forest incomes: application to public cork oak forests of Jerez in Spain and Iteimia in Tunisia. Ecol Econ 65:76–86
Campos P, Oviedo JL, Caparros A, Huntsinger L, Coelho I (2009) Contingent valuation of woodland-owner private amenities in Spain, Portugal, and California. Rangel Ecol Mgmt 62(3):240–252
Caparrós A, Campos P, Montero G (2003) An operative framework for total hicksian income measurement: application to a multiple use forest. Envi Res Econ 26:173–198
Caparrós A, Cerdá E, Ovando P, Campos P (2010) Carbon sequestration with reforestations and biodiversity-scenic values. Envi Res Econ 45:49–72
Caparrós A, Ovando P, Oviedo JL, Campos P (2011) Accounting for carbon in avoided degradation and reforestation programmes in Mediterranean forests. Envi Devel Econ 16(4):405–428
CDF-FRAP [California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection-Fire and Resource Assessment Program, CalFire] (2003) Changing California: forest and range 2003 assessment. Sacramento, State of California Resources Agency, CA. http://www.frap.cdf.ca.gov/assessment2003. Accessed June 2012
Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4(11):1–15
Chaplin-Kramer R, Tuxen-Bettman K, Kremin C (2011) Supplying pollination services to California agriculture. Rangel 33(3):33–41
Cheatum M, Casey F, Alvarez P, Parkhurst B (2011) Payments for ecosystem services: a California rancher perspective. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Washington D.C
Costanza R, Ralph d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Shahid Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Suttonkk P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260
Diamond NK, Standiford RB, Passof PC, LeBlanc J (1987) Oak trees have varied effect on land values. Cal Ag 41:4–6
DÃaz M (2009) Biodiversity in the dehesa. In: Mosquera MR, Rigueiro A (eds) Agroforestry systems as a technique for sustainable land management. AECID, Madrid, pp 209–225
DÃaz M, Pulido FJ (1995) Wildlife-habitat relationships in the Spanish dehesa. In: McCracken DI, Bignal EM, Wenlock SE (eds) Farming on the edge: the nature of traditional farmland in Europe. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, pp 103–111
DÃaz M, Campos-PalacÃn P, Pulido FJ (1997) The Spanish dehesas: a diversity in land use and wildlife. (Chapter 7) In: Pain DJ, Pienkowski M (eds) Farming and birds in Europe: the common agricultural policy and its implications for bird conservation. Academic Press, London, p 436
DÃaz M, Baquero RA, Carricondo A, Fernández F, GarcÃa J, Yela JL (2006) Bases ecológicas para la definición de las prácticas agrarias compatibles con las Directivas de Aves y de Hábitats. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente-Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo. http://www.mma.es/portal/secciones/biodiversidad/desarrollo_rural_paisaje/naturaleza_rural/estudios_bases_ecologicas.htm
DiDonato J (2007) Endangered amphibian research within grazed grasslands. Keeping landscapes working, University California Cooperative Extension Newsletter for Rangeland Managers Winter: 4–6. http://cesantaclara.ucdavis.edu/newsletterfiles/Keeping_Landscapes_Working10641.pdf
EEA [European Environment Agency] (2011) An experimental framework for ecosystem capital accounting in Europe. EEA. Copenhagen
Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (1981) Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species, 1st edn. Random House, New York
Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA (1983) Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioSci 33:248–254
EEME [La Evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio de España] (2011) La Evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio de España. SÃntesis de resultados. Fundación Biodiversidad. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino
Ferranto S, Huntsinger L, Getz C, Nakamura G, Stewart W, Drill S, Valachovic Y, DeLasaux M, Kelly M (2011) Forest and rangeland owners value land for natural amenities and as financial investment. Cal Ag 65(4):185–191
Ferranto S, Huntsinger L, Stewart B, Getz C, Nakamura G, Kelly M (2012) Consider the source: the impact of media and authority in outreach to California’s forest and rangeland owners. J Environ Manage 97:131–140
Germano DJ, Rathbun GB, Saslaw LR (2010) Effects of grazing and invasive grasses on desert vertebrates in California. J Wildl Mgmt 9999:1–13
Gosnell H, Robinson-Maness N, Charnley S (2011) Engaging ranchers in market-based approaches to climate change mitigation: opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. Rangel 64:20–24
Gustankii JA, Squires RH (2000). Protecting the land: conservation easements past, present and future. Island Press, Washington D.C.
Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (V1). Fifth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, United Nations. New York, 23–25 June 2010. Available online
Howitt R (1995) Positive mathematical programming. Am J Ag Econ 77:329–342
Huntsinger L, Fortmann LP (1990) California privately owned oak woodlands—owners, use, and management. J Range Man 43(2):147–152
Huntsinger L, Sulak A, Gwin L, Plieninger T (2004) Oak woodland ranchers in California and Spain: conservation and diversification. In: Schnabel S and Ferreira A (eds) Sustainability of Agrosilvopastoral Systems: Dehesas, Montados. Chapter 6. Adv Geoecology 37:309–326
Huntsinger L, Johnson M, Stafford M, Fried J (2010) Hardwood rangeland landowners in California from 1985 to 2004: production, ecosystem services, and permanence. Rangel Ecol Manage 63(3):324–334
Joffre R, Ourcival J, Rambal S, Rocheteau A (2003) The key role of topsoil moisture on CO2 efflux from a mediterranean quercus ilex forest. Ann For Sci 60:519–526
Kelt DA, Konno ES, Wilson JA (2005) Habitat management for the endangered Stephens’ kangaroo rat: the effect of mowing and grazing. J Wildl Manag 69(1):424–429
Kovacs K, VáclavÃk T, Haight RG, Pang A, Cunniffe NJ, Gilligan CA, Meentemeyer RK (2011) Predicting the economic costs and property value losses attributed to sudden oak death damage in California (2010–2020). J Environ Manage 92:1292–1302
Kroeger T, Casey F, Alvarez P, Cheatum M, Tavassol L (2010) An economic analysis of the benefits of habitat conservation on California rangelands, a conservation economics white paper. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington D.C
Krutilla JV (1967) Conservation reconsidered. Am Econ Rev 57(4):777–786
Land Trust Alliance (2010) 2010 National land trust census report. A Look at voluntary land conservation in America. Available at http://www.landtrustalliance.org/land-trusts/land-trust-census/national-land-trust-census-2010/2010-final-report. Accessed Sep 2012
Li YL, Tenhunen J, Mirzaei H, Hussain MZ, Siebicke L, Foken T, Otieno D, Schmidt M, Ribeiro N, Aires L, Pio N, Banza J, Pereira J (2008) Assessment and up-scaling of CO2 exchange by patches of the herbaceous vegetation mosaic in a Portuguese cork oak woodland. Agric For Meteorol 148(8–9):1318–1331
Liffmann RH, Huntsinger L, Forero LC (2000) To ranch or not to ranch: Home on the urban range? J Range Man 53(4):362–370
Loomis J, Gonzalez-Caban A (1996) A willingness to pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire. Ecol Econ 25:315–322
López-Bote CJ (1998) Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed. Meat Sci 49:17–27
Martin WE, Jeffries GL (1966) Relating ranch prices and grazing permit values to ranch productivity. J Farm Econ 48:233–242
Merenlender AM, Huntsinger L, Guthey G, Fairfax SK (2004) Land trusts and conservation easements: Who is conserving what for whom? Conser Biol 18(1):65–75
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Montambault JR, Alavalapatti JRR (2005) Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: a decade in review. Agrofor Sys 65:151–161
Newburn D, Reed S, Berck P, Merenlender A (2005) Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation. Cons Biol 19(5):1411–1420
Newburn DA, Berck P, Merenlender AM (2006) Habitat and open space at risk of land-use conversion: targeting strategies for land conservation. Am J Ag Econ 88(1):28–42
Nuzum RC (2005) Report: Using livestock grazing as a resource management tool in California. Contra Costa Water District report. www.ccwater.com/files/LivestockGrazingFinal72005.pdf. Accessed Aug 2006
O’Geen AT, Dahlgren RA, Swarowsky A, Tate KW, Lewis DJ, Singer MJ (2010) Research connects soil hydrology and stream water chemistry in California oak woodlands. Cal Ag 64(2):78–84
Olewiler N (2004). The value of natural capital in settled areas of Canada. Ducks Unlimited Canada and the Nature Conservancy of Canada, Canada, p 36 http://www.ducks.ca/aboutduc/news/archives/pdf/ncapital.pdf
Oñate JJ, Malo JE, Suárez F, Peco B (1998) Regional and environmental aspects in the implementation of Spanish agri-environmental schemes. J Envir Mgmt 52:227–240
Ovando P, Campos P, Montero G (2007) Forestaciones con encina y alcornoque en el área de la dehesa en el marco del Reglamento (CE) 2080/92 (1993–2000). Rev Esp Estud Agrosoc y Pesq 214:173–186
Ovando P, Campos P, Oviedo JL, Montero G (2010) Private net benefits from afforesting marginal crop and shrublands with cork oaks in Spain. For Sci 56:567–577
Oviedo JL, Caparrós A, Campos P (2005) Valoración contingente del uso recreativo y de conservación de los visitantes del parque natural los Alcornocales. Rev Esp Estud Agrosoc Pesq 208:115–140
Oviedo JL, Huntsinger L, Campos P, Caparrós A (2012) Income value of private amenities assessed in California oak woodlands. Cal Agric 66(3):91–96
Pereira JS, Mateus JA, Aires LM, Pita G, Pio C, David JS, Andrade V, Banza J, David TS, Paco TA, Rodrigues A (2007) Net ecosystem carbon exchange in three contrasting mediterranean ecosystems—the effect of drought. Biogeosci 4(5):791–802
Pistorius T, Schaich H, Winkel G, Plieninger T, Bieling C, Konold W, Volz K-R (2012) Lessons for REDDplus: a comparative analysis of the German discourse on forest functions and the global ecosystem services debate. For Pol Econ 18:4–12
Redford KH, Adams WM (2009) Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conser Biol 23(4):785–787
Reiner R, Craig A (2011) Conservation easements in California blue oak woodlands: testing the assumption of livestock grazing as a compatible use. Nat Areas J 31(4):408–413
Richmond OMW, Chen SK, Risk BB, Tecklin J, Beissinger SR (2010) California black rails depend on irrigation-fed wetlands in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Cal Ag 64(2):85–93
Rilla E, Sokolow AD (2000) California farmers and conservation easements: motivations, experiences and perceptions in three counties. In California Farmland and Open Space Policy Series: U of California Agricultural Issues Center
Ruiz-Avilés P, Madueño C, Arenas JG, Antonio J (2001) EconomÃa ambiental de los parques naturales de Córdoba. Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba
SCEP [Study of Critical Environmental Problems] (1970) Man’s impact on the global environment; assessment and recommendations for action. MIT Press, Cambridge
Schultz JL (1972) Sociocultural factors in financial management strategies of western livestock producers. Final report. Economic Research Service Farm Production Economics Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture. J., Washington, D.C. http://www.sbcouncil.org/Ranching-History-and-Trends. Accessed July 2012
Smith AH, Martin WE (1972) Socioeconomic behavior of cattle ranchers, with implications for rural community development in the west. Am J Ag Econ 54(2):217–225
Standiford RB, Howitt RE (1992) Solving empirical bioeconomic models: a rangeland management application. Am J Ag Econ 74:421–433
Standiford RB, Scott T (2001) Value of oak woodlands and open space on private property values in southern California. Inv Agrar Sist y Recurs, special issue 1:137–152
Standiford RB, McCreary D, Gaertner S, Forero L (1996) Impact of firewood harvesting on hardwood rangelands varies with region. Cal Ag 50:7–12
Starrs PF (1997) Let the cowboy ride: cattle ranching in the American west. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Sulak A, Huntsinger L, Standiford R, Merenlender A, Fairfax SK (2004) A strategy for oak woodland conservation: the conservation easement in California. In: Schnabel S and Ferreira A (eds) Sustainability of Agrosilvopastoral Systems: Dehesas, Montados. Chapter 6. Adv Geoecology 37:353–364
Talbert CB, Knight RL, Mitchell JE (2007) Private ranchlands and public land grazing in the southern rocky mountains. Rangel 29(3):5–8
Tanaka JA, Brunson M, Torrell A (2011) Chapter 9: a social and economic assessment of rangeland conservation practices, pp 373–422. In: Briske DD (ed) Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: assessment, recommendations, and knowledge gaps. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Lawrence, Allen Press, KS, p 429
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2011) Agriculture Survey. Conservation highlights. Available at: http://www.iaenvironment.org/documents/Packard%20Farm%20Bill%20Conservation%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed Aug 2012
Thompson RP, Noel JE, Cross SP (2001) Oak woodlands economics: a contingent valuation of conversion alternatives. In Proceedings of the fifth symposium on oak woodlands: Oaks in California’s changing landscape, San Diego, California, 22–25 Oct 2001
Torell LA, Kincaid ME (1996) Public land policy and the market value of New Mexico ranches, 1979–94. J Range Man 49(3):270–276
Torell LA, Rimbey NR, Ramirez OA, McCollum DW (2005) Income earning potential versus consumptive amenities in determining ranchland values. J Agric Resour Econ 30(3):537–560
USDA-NRCS-EQIP [United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service-Environmental Quality Incentives Program] (2011) EQIP 2011 contracts and funding data. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/programs/financial/eqip/?&cid=nrcs143_008294. Accessed Dec 2011
USDA-NRCS-WHIP [United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service-Wildlife Habitat Improvement Program] (2011) WHIP 2011 contracts and funding. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/programs/financial/whip/?&cid=stelprdb1041997. Accessed Dec 2011
Weiss SB (1999) Cars, cows, and checkerspot butterflies: nitrogen deposition and management of nutrient-poor grasslands for a threatened species. Conser Biol 13(6):1476–1486
Wood DV (2006) How to keep fires down in California scrub: chew it. The Christian Science Monitor, 18 Sept
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for constructive criticisms on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caparrós, A., Huntsinger, L., Oviedo, J.L., Plieninger, T., Campos, P. (2013). Economics of Ecosystem Services. In: Campos, P., et al. Mediterranean Oak Woodland Working Landscapes. Landscape Series, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6707-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6707-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6706-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6707-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)