Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Cost-Effective Is Forestry for Climate Change Mitigation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities for the World's Forests in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 81))

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis is important in focusing policies on minimising the costs of meeting climate change mitigation targets and other policy goals. This chapter provides a review of previous cost-effectiveness estimates of forestry options and underlying approaches, focusing especially upon UK studies, and setting the estimates in the context of those for other mitigation measures. Methodological issues such as discounting affecting estimates are discussed and existing evidence gaps highlighted.

For the UK, research gaps include evidence on impacts of afforestation on forest soil carbon balance, on comprehensive GHG balances for forest stands, on carbon stock changes during early tree growth and once stands reach maturity, and carbon substitution (or displacement) benefits. Better evidence is also needed on opportunity costs and on leakage effects.

Existing evidence indicates that forestry options are generally cost-effective compared with a range of alternatives. Whether this conclusion holds in particular cases will vary between projects and regions, as well as being dependent upon the approach adopted. To the extent that cost-effectiveness estimates depend upon the methodology adopted and benchmark used, future comparisons could benefit from greater methodological transparency and consistency.

Not only may forestry options be relatively cost-effective but, given the challenging task of reaching current targets, they are likely to be critical if existing international objectives on climate change mitigation are to be met.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ADAS (forthcoming) Analysis of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, forestry and land management – forestry options. Report to Forestry Commission England, ADAS, Abingdon, Oxfordshire. (Final draft versions dated June 2009 and July 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger N, Fankhauser S (1993) Economic analysis of the greenhouse effect: optimal abatement level and strategies for mitigation. Int J Environ Pollut 3:104–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D (1991) The forestry industry and the greenhouse effect. Scottish Forestry Trust and Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R, Canadell J, Randerson J, Jackson R, Hungate B, Baldocchi D, Ban-Weiss G, Bonan G, Caldiera K, Cao L, Diffenbaugh N, Gurney K, Kueppers L, Law B, Luyssaert S, O’Halloran T (2011) Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection. Front Ecol Environ 9(3):174–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Artz R, Donnelly D, Cuthbert A, Evans C, Smart S, Reed M, Kenter J, Clark J (2012) Restoration of lowland raised bogs in Scotland: emissions savings and the implications of a changing climate on lowland raised bog condition. IUCN/James Hutton Institute/ Scottish Wildlife Trust/Esmée Fairburn Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvizu D, Bruckner T, Chum H, Edenhofer O, Estefen S, Faaij A, Fischedick M, Hansen G, Hiriart G, Hohmeyer O, Hollands K, Huckerby J, Kadner S, Killingtveit Ã…, Kumar A, Lewis A, Lucon O, Matschoss P, Maurice L, Mirza M, Mitchell C, Moomaw W, Moreira J, Nilsson L, Nyboer J, Pichs-Madruga R, Sathaye J, Sawin J, Schaeffer R, Schei T, Schlömer S, Seyboth K, Sims R, Sinden G, Sokona Y, von Stechow C, Steckel J, Verbruggen A, Wiser R, Yamba F, Zwickel T (2011) Technical summary. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlomer S and von Stechow C (eds) (2012) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srren/SRREN_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • Ayers R, Walter J (1991) The greenhouse effect: damages, costs and abatement. Environ Resour Econ 1:237–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow P, Hinsley AP, Price C (1986) The effect of afforestation on hydroelectricity generation: a quantitative assessment. Land Use Policy 3:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate R, Morris J (1994) Global warming: apocalypse or hot air? Institute of Economic Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger M (2012) Solar-powered cement production without carbon dioxide emissions. Nanowerk. http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=24883.php. Accessed 12 Nov 2012

  • Brainard J, Bateman IJ, Lovett AA (2009) The social value of carbon sequestered in Great Britain’s woodlands. Ecol Econ 68:1257–1267

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadmeadow M, Matthews R (2003) Forests, carbon and climate change: the UK contribution. Information Note 48, Forestry Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White Horse Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Cardenas L, MacCarthy J, Murrells T, Pang Y, Passant N, Thistlethwaite G, Thomson A, Webb N, with contributions from Dore C, Gilhespy S, Goodwin J, Hallsworth S, Hobson M, Manning A, Martinez C, Matthews R, Misselbrook T, Thomas J, Walker C, Walker H, Watterson JD (2012) UK greenhouse gas inventory, 1990–2010: Annual Report for Submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, AEA Technology report to DECC. http://naei.defra.gov.uk/reports.php?list=GHG

  • Caney S (2010) Human rights, climate change and discounting. In: O’Brien K, St Clair AL, Kristoffersen B (eds) Climate change, ethics and human security. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 113–130, Chapter 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell MGR, Dewar RC, Pyatt DG (1993) Conifer plantations on drained peatlands in Britain: a net gain or loss of carbon? Forestry 66:353–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Macrchiori C, Oreffice S (2009) Endogenous minimum participation in international environmental treaties. Environ Resource Econ 42:411–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SJ (2012) Solving the problem of carbon dioxide emissions. Paper presented at the IUFRO conference on new frontiers in forest economics, Zurich, June, 26th–30th. http://neffe.ch/index.php?id=48#c205. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • Clarkson R, Deyes K (2002) Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions. Government Economic Service Working Paper 140. HM Treasury/Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline WR (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • CO2Now (2013) Annual data: atmospheric CO2. CO2now.com website, http://co2now.org/. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Change 77:211–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta PS, Heal G (1979) Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • DECC and HM Treasury (2011) Valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for appraisal and evaluation. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/analysts_group/analysts_group.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA, DARDNI, RERAD, DRAH (2010) Agriculture in the United Kingdom. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey J, Plantinga A, Alig R (2010) What explains differences in the costs of carbon sequestration in forests? A review of alternative cost estimation methodologies. Chapter 4. In: Alig R (ed) Economic modeling of effects of climate change on the forest sector and mitigation options: a compendium of briefing papers. Report PNW-GTR-833, pacific North West Research Station. US Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, pp 87–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Elzen M, Hare W, Höhne N, Levin K, Lowe J, Riahi K, Rogelj J, Sawin E, Taylor C, van Vuuren D, Ward M, Bosetti V, Chen C, Dellink R, Fenhann J, Gesteira C, Hanaoka T, Kainuma M, Kejun J, Massetti E, Matthews B, Olausson C, O’Neill B, Ranger N, Wagner F, Xiusheng Z (2010) The emissions gap report: are the Copenhagen pledges sufficient to limit global warming to 2°C or 1.5°C? UN Environmental Programme, Nairobi, www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgapreport/. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1991) Policy appraisal and the environment. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar RC, Cannell MGR (1992) Carbon sequestration in the trees, products, litter and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiol 11:49–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz D, Hamilton K, Peters-Stanley M (2011) State of the forest carbon markets 2011: from canopy to currency. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, http://www.forest-trends.org/publication_details.php?publicationID=2963

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner S, Ekins P, McGeevor K, Tomei J (2007) Forest and climate change: global understandings and possible responses. Chapter 6 in Freer-Smith P, Broadmeadow M, Lynch J (eds) Forests and Climate Change, Forest Research/CABI

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke G, Dickie I, Juniper T, ten Kate K, Pieterse M, Rafiq M, Rayment M, Smith S, Voulvoulis N (2012) Opportunities for UK business that value and/or protect Nature’s services; elaboration of proposals for potential business opportunities. Attachment 1 to Final Report to the Ecosystem Markets Task Force and Valuing Nature Network. GHK, London, http://uncsd.iisd.org/news/defra-reports-on-business-opportunities-in-protecting-nature%E2%80%99s-services/

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards PN, Christie JM (1981) Yield models for forest management. Forestry Commission Booklet 48. HMSO, Edinburgh, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Kesicki F, Smith A (2011) Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. Report to Greenpeace UK by UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasch Review (2008) Climate change: financing Global Forests, independent report to government, commissioned by the Prime Minister and prepared by Johan Eliasch with the support of the Office of Climate Change, London

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Climate action: emissions trading system (EU ETS). European commission. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm. Accessed 12 June 2012

  • FAO (2010) Global Forest Reseources Assessment 2010. Forestry Paper 163, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/.Accessed 18 Dec 2012

  • Forestry Commission (2011a) The woodland carbon code. Version 1.3. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (2011b) Forests and water UK forestry standard guidelines, 5th edn. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (2012) Carbon leakage. Woodland carbon code section 3.3. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-8hngvh. Accessed 7 Nov 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S (1995) Valuing climate change. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gateley D (1980) Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables: comment. Bell J Econ 11:373–374

    Google Scholar 

  • GCP (2012) Carbon budget and trends 2012. http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/12/hl-full.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • Gerlagh R, Liski M (2012) Carbon prices for the next thousand years. CESifo Working Paper 3855. http://re3.feem.it/getpage.aspx?id=4941

  • Gorte R (2009) Carbon sequestration in forests. Congressional research Service, Washington, DC, www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31432.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Nazarenko L, Ruedy R, Sato M, Willis J, Del Genio A, Koch D, Lacis A, Lo K, Menon S, Novakov T, Perlwitz J, Russell G, Schmidt GA, Tausnev N (2005) Earth’s energy imbalance: confirmation and implications. Science 308:1431–1435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Beerling D, Berner R, Masson-Delmotte V, Pagani M, Raymo M, Royer DL, Zachos JC (2008) Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? Open Atmos Sci J 2:217–231, http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi?id=ha00410c

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healey JR, Price C, Tay J (2000) The cost of carbon retention by reduced impact logging. For Ecol Manage 139:237–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm D (2012a) The carbon crunch: how we are getting climate change wrong – and how to fix it. Yale University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm D (2012b) Forget the Kyoto accord and tax carbon consumption. Environment 360. http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/sites/default/files/YALEEnv360081112.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • Helm D, Hepburn C, Ruta G (2012) Trade, climate change and the political game theory of border carbon adjustments. Working Paper 80, Centre for climate change economics and policy, and Grantham research institute on climate change and the environment, Leeds/London. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publications/WorkingPapers/Abstracts/80-89/Trade-climate-change-border-carbon-adjustments-abstract.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • Henders S, Ostwald M (2012) Forest carbon leakage quantification methods and their suitability for assessing leakage in REDD. Forests 3:33–58, http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/3/1/33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn C, Koundouri P (2007) Recent advances in discounting: implications for forest economics. J For Econ 13:169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury and DECC (2012) Valuation of energy use and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions: supplementary guidance to the HM treasury green book on appraisal and evaluation in central government. HM Treasury and Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, https://whitehall-admin.production.alphagov.co.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/68947/supplementary.docx. Accessed 8 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockley N, Edwards-Jones G (2009) Growing food and fibre in a constrained world. In: Hemery G (ed). Timber, mutton or fuel? Debating the economics of land use and forestry. Proceedings of the ICF National Conference 2009. Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoen HF, Solberg B (1994) Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. For Sci 40:429–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhne N, Kejun J, Rogelj J, Segafredo L, Seroa da Motta R, Shukla PR, Angelsen A, Blok K, Chen C, Cruz R, Dalkmann H, Dellink R, den Elzen M, Egan C, Façanha C, Gesteira C, Graham P, Hargrave J, Hanaoka T, Karpay D, Levin K, Lowe J, Luderer G, Montzka S, Olivier J, Pestiaux J, Sawin E, Schaeffer M, Schaeffer R, Taylor C, Ton M, Ãœrge-Vorsatz D, van Vuuren D, Wagner F, Wunder S, and Xiusheng Z (2012) The emissions gap report 2012. UN Environmental Programme, Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/pdf/2012gapreport.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • IEA (2011) World Energy Outlook, press and media, quotes. International Energy Authority. http://www.iea.org/publications/worldenergyoutlook/pressmedia/quotes/5/. Accessed 13 Nov 2012

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Houghton J, Ding Y, Griggs D, Noguer M, van der Linden P, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson C (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/. Accessed 23 Jan.2013

  • IPCC (2005) Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Meeting report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change expert meeting on Geoengineering. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Field C, Barros V, Stocker TF, Dahe Q, Minx J, Mach K, Plattner G-K, Schlömer S, Hansen G, Mastrandrea M (eds) IPCC Working Group III technical support unit, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany. http://www.ipcc-wg3.de/meetings/expert-meetings-and-workshops/em-geoengineering. Accessed 7 Nov.2012

  • Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritze R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis P, Clement R, Grace J, Smith K (2009) The role of forests in the capture and exchange of energy and greenhouse gases. Chapter 3. In: Read D, Freer-Smith P, Morrison J, Hanley N, West C, Snowdon P (eds) Combating climate change – a role for UK forests. An assessment of the potential of the UK’s trees and woodlands to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, pp 21–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1990) The cost of controlling US carbon dioxide emissions. Quoted in Cline (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith DW, Parson E, Morgan MG (2010) Research on global sun block needed now. Nature 463:426–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kesicki F (2011) Marginal abatement cost curves for policy-making – expert-based vs model-derived curves. UCL Energy Institute, University College London. www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucft347/Kesicki_MACC.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • Latin H (2012) Climate change policy failures: why conventional mitigation approaches cannot succeed. World Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Page M (2012) Global warming/global warning. New Sci 216(2891):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton T, Held H, Kreigler E, Hall J, Lucht W, Rahmstorf S, Schellnhuber H (2008) Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Natl Acad Sci USA 105(6):1786–1793

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lind RC (ed) (1982) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2010) Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe J (2008) Intergenerational wealth transfers and social discounting: supplementary Green Book guidance. HM Treasury, London, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/4(5).pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthi D, Le Floch M, Bereiter B, Blunier T, Barnola J-M, Siegenthaler U, Raynaud D, Jouzel J, Fischer H, Kawamura K, Stocker T (2008) High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000-800,000 years before present. Nature 453:379–382, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/pdf/nature06949.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahli Y, Meir P, Brown S (2002) Forests, carbon and global climate. Philo Trans R Soc Lond 360:1567–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW, Broadmeadow MSJ (2009) The Potential of UK forestry to Contribute to Government’s Emissions Reduction Commitments. In: Read DJ, Freer-Smith PH, Morison JIL, Hanley N, West CC, Snowdon P (eds) In Combating climate change – a role for UK forests – an assessment of the potential of the UK’s trees and woodlands to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, pp 139–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran D, Macleod M, Wall E, Eory V, Pajot G, Matthews R, Mcvittie A, Barnes A, Rees B, Moxey A, Williams A, Smith P (2008) UK marginal abatement cost curves for agriculture and land use, land-use change and forestry sectors out to 2022, with qualitative analysis of options to 2050. Final Report to the Committee on Climate Change, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison JIL, Matthews R, Miller G, Perks M, Randle T, Vanguelova E, White M, Yamulki S (2012) Understanding the carbon and greenhouse gas balance of UK forests. Report for Forestry Commission, Forest Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxey A (2011) Illustrative economics of peatland restoration. Report to IUCN UK Peatland Programme. www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/scientificreviews. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • Murray B, McCarl B, Lee H-C (2004) Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs. Land Econ 80(1):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray B, Lubowski R, Sohngen B (2009) Including international forest carbon incentives in climate policy: understanding the economics. Nicholas Institute, Duke University, USA, www.nicholas.duke.edu/institute/carbon.economy.06.09.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabuurs G, Masera O, Andrasko K, Beneez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M, Elsiddig E, Ford-Robertson J, Frumhoff P, Karjalainen T, Krankina O, Kurz W, Matsumoto M, Oyhantcabal W, Ravindranath N, Sanz Sanchez M, Zhang X (2007) Forestry. In climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1991) Policy implications of greenhouse warming. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijnik M, Pajot G, Moffat A, Slee B (2013) An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climate change. For Policy Econ 26:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet T (2005) Water use by trees. Information Note, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-8bvgx9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet T, Marrington S, Thomas H, Broadmeadow S, Valatin G (2011) Slowing the flow at pickering, final report to Defra of FCERM multi-objective flood management demonstration project RMP5455. Forest Research, Farnham, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/INFD-7ZUCQY#final1. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (1991) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101:920–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (1993) Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Resour Energy Econ 15:27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2007) A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. J Econ Lit 45:686–702

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) The economics of climate change mitigation: policies and options for Global action beyond 2012. OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,3746,en_2649_34361_41951200_1_1_1_1,00.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget (various years) Budget of the United States Government. Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • OFGEM (2012) Feed-in Tariff Payment Rate Table for Photovoltaic Eligible Installations for FIT Year 3 (2012/13). Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (OFGEM), London. http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Sustainability/Environment/fits/tariff-tables/Pages/index.aspx. Accessed 10 Jan 2013

  • Olschewski R, Benitez PC (2010) Optimizing joint production of timber and carbon sequestration of afforestation projects. J For Econ 16:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • OXERA (2002) A social time preference rate for use in long-term discounting. OXERA Consulting/Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Department for Transport, Department for the Environment and Rural Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson P, Palmer M (2000) Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature 406:695–699

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters G, Andrew R, Boden T, Canadell J, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Marland G, Raupach M, Wilson C (2013) The challenge to keep global warming below 2°C. Nat Clim Chang 3:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters-Stanley M, Hamilton K (2012) Developing dimension: state of the voluntary carbon markets 2012. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, http://www.forest-trends.org/publication_details.php?publicationID=3164, Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney PR, Weyant JP (eds) (1999) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry Energy Consulting (2007) Analysis of carbon capture and storage cost–supply curves for the UK. Pöyry Energy, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1973) To the future: with indifference or concern? The social discount rate and its implications in land use. J Agric Econ 24:393–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1984) Project appraisal and planning for over-developed countries. Environ Manage 8:221–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1988) Does social cost-benefit analysis measure overall utility change? Econ Lett 26:357–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1990) The allowable burn effect: a new escape from the bogey of compound interest. For Chron 66:572–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1993) Time, discounting and value. Blackwell, Oxford, Also freely available in electronic format from c.price@bangor.ac.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1997) Analysis of time profiles of climate change. In: Adger WN, Pettenella D, Whitby M (eds) Climate change mitigation and European land use policies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 71–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2003) Diminishing marginal utility: the respectable case for discounting? Int J Sustain Dev 6:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2005) How sustainable is discounting? In: Kant S, Berry AL (eds) Sustainability, economics and natural resources: economics of sustainable forest management. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 106–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2006) Economics of sustainable development: reconciling diverse intertemporal perspectives. In Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems (electronic book, no page numbers). EoLSS Publishers, Ramsey

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2007) Sustainable forest management, pecuniary externalities and invisible stakeholders. For Policy Econ 9:751–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2010) Low discount rates and insignificant environmental values. Ecol Econ 69:1895–1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2011) Optimal rotation with declining discount rate. J For Econ 17:307–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (2012) Rising carbon flux price and the paradoxes of forest-based reduction of atmospheric carbon stock: an extended summary. Scand For Econ 44:240. Full manuscript available from the author

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (in review) A nightmare waiting in the wings: the social cost of carbon, forest economics and declining discount rates. Manuscript submitted to Journal of Forest Economics. Available from the author

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse Cooper (2012) Too late for two degrees? Low carbon economy index 2012. http://www.pwc.com/en_GX/gx/low-carbon-economy-index/assets/pwc-low-carbon-economy-index-2012.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2012

  • Price C, Willis R (1993) Time, discounting and the valuation of forestry’s carbon fluxes. Commonw For Rev 72:265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C, Willis R (2011) The multiple effects of carbon values on optimal rotation. J For Econ 17:298–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Radov D, Klevnas P, Skurray J, Harris D, Chambers B, Chadwick D, Dyer R, Nagler D (2007) Market mechanisms for reducing GHG emissions from agriculture, forestry and land management. NERA Economic Consulting, Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Feng Y (2008) On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: formidable challenges ahead. Natl Acad Sci USA 105(38):14245–14250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38:543–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Read DJ, Freer-Smith PH, Morrison JIL, Hanley N, West CC, Snowdon P (eds) (2009) Combating climate change – a role for UK forests. An assessment of the potential of the UK’s trees and woodlands to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, http://www.tsoshop.co.uk/gempdf/Climate_Change_Main_Report.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards K, Andersson A (2001) The leaky sink: persistent obstacles to a forest carbon sequestration program based upon individual projects. Clim Policy 1:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards KR, Stokes C (2004) A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Clim Change 63:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebeek H (2011) The carbon cycle. Earth Observatory, NASA. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/CarbonCycle/. Accessed 7 Nov 2012

  • Robock A, Marquardt A, Kravitz B, Stenchikov G (2009) Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 36, L19703

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty. Royal Society, London, http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2009/geoengineering-climate/. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo RA, Ley E (1997) The potential role of large-scale forestry in Argentina. In: Adger WN, Pettenella D, Whitby M (eds) Climate change mitigation and European land use policies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo RA, Solomon AM (1989) Climate and forests. In: Rosenberg NJ et al (eds) Greenhouse warming: abatement and adaptation. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp 105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber H (2008) Global warming: stop worrying, start panicking? Natl Acad Sci USA 105(38):14239–14240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber H (2011) Geoengineering: the good, the MAD, and the sensible. Natl Acad Sci USA 108(51):20277–20278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber HJ (2012) Reply to Schuiling: last things last. Natl Acad Sci USA 109(20):E1211. http://www.pnas.org/content/109/20/E1211.full.pdf+html. Accessed 7 Nov 2013

  • Schuiling R (2012) Capturing CO2 from the air. Natl Acad Sci USA 109(20):14239–14240

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuur E, Abbott B (2011) High risk of permafrost thaw. Nature 480:32–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen B (2009) An analysis of forestry carbon sequestration as a response to climate change. Copenhagen Consensus Center, Copenhagen, http://fixtheclimate.com/component-1/the-solutions-new-research/forestry

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen B, Sedjo R (2006) Carbon sequestration costs in global forests. Energy J, Special Issue 27:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash C (1994) Double CO2 and beyond: benefits, costs and compensation. Ecol Econ 10:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash C (2002) Greenhouse economics: value and ethics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer I, Bann C, Moran D, Mcvittie A, Lawrence K, Caldwell V (2008) A framework for environmental accounts for agriculture. Report SFS0601 by Jacobs with Scottish Agricultural College and Cranfield University to DEFRA Welsh Assemby Government, Scottish Government, and DARD (N Ireland), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change, HM Treasury/Cambridge University Press. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • Thompson D, Matthews R (1989) CO2 in trees and timber lowers greenhouse effect. Forestry and British Timber October:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury HM (2003) The green book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumper K, Bertzky M, Dickson B, van der Heijden G, Jenkins M, Manning P (June 2009) The natural fix? The role of ecosystems in climate mitigation. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, UNEPWCMC, Cambridge. http://www.grida.no/publications/rr/natural-fix/. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • UNFCCC (2008) Report of the conference of the parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. Part two: action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its thirteenth session. United Nations Convention on Climate Change, Decision 2/CP.13, FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • UNFCCC (2010) Report of the conference of the parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Part two: action taken by the conference of the parties at its fifteenth session. United Nations Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1 http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • UNFCCC (2011) Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Part two: action taken by the conference of the parties at its sixteenth session. United Nations Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

  • Valatin G (2005) Justice, human security and the environment, PhD Dissertation, Economics Department, University of Siena

    Google Scholar 

  • Valatin G (2011a) Forests and carbon: a review of additionality. Research Report. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/INFD-7WUEAN. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Valatin G (2011b) Forests and carbon: valuation, discounting and risk management. Research Report, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/INFD-7WUEAN. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Valatin G (2012) Marginal abatement cost curves for UK forestry. Research Report 19, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/PDF/FCRP019.pdf/$FILE/FCRP019.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Valatin G, Saraev V ((2012) Natural environment framework: woodland creation case study. Report to Forestry Commission Wales, Forest Research, Edinburgh, http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/INFD-8YAECD. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Valatin G, Starling J (2011) Valuation of ecosystem services provided by UK woodlands, appendix to chapter 22 of UK National Ecosystem Assessment. UNEP-WCMC/Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kooten GC, Sohngen B (2007) Economics of forest ecosystem carbon sinks: a review. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 1:237–269

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kooten GC, Johnston C, Xu Z (2012) Economics of forest carbon sequestration. Working paper 2-12-4, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group. University of Victoria, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikard H-P, Wangler L, Freytag A. (2009). Minimum participation rules with heterogeneous countries. Jena Economic Research Papers, zs.thulb.uni-jena.de/receive/jportal_jparticle_00156984

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall F, Chapman P, Holden J, Evans C, Artz R, Smith P, Grayson R (2011) A review of current evidence on carbon fluxes and greenhouse gas emissions from UK peatlands. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/jncc442_webFinal.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to James Morison, Chris Quine, Richard Haw, Trevor Fenning and Andrew Moxey for comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Forest Research, Northern Research Station, FR-NRS & Bangor University, Roslin, EH25 9SY, Midlothian, Scotland

    Gregory Valatin

  2. 90 Farrar Road, LL57 2DU, Bangor, Wales, UK

    Colin Price

Authors
  1. Gregory Valatin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Colin Price
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Valatin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Forest Research, Northern Research Station, UK Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Trevor Fenning

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valatin, G., Price, C. (2014). How Cost-Effective Is Forestry for Climate Change Mitigation?. In: Fenning, T. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for the World's Forests in the 21st Century. Forestry Sciences, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation