Skip to main content

Geophysical Data Integration for Quick-Clay Mapping: The Hvittingfoss Case Study, Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landslides in Sensitive Clays

Abstract

Quick-clay landslides are a known hazard in formerly glaciated coastal areas. Some of Norway’s most densely populated areas are located in potential quick-clay zones and, hence, large efforts are devoted to map the distribution of quick clays. Here, we focus on one particular Norwegian site (Hvittingfoss, 100 km south-west of Oslo), which was remediated against potential sliding in 2008. A set of geophysical methods including Electrical Resistivity Tomography, P-wave seismic refraction tomography, S-wave seismic reflection profiling, and Ground Penetrating Radar, were jointly analysed and complemented with laboratory data and in-situ geotechnical measurements (i.e., CPTU, SCPTU and RCPTU) in order to establish a suitable, integrated and multi-disciplinary approach to map the extent of the quick-clay zone. Through careful integration and interpretation of the different data, the main deposits were identified. Both the clay deposit and the overlying sand layer were precisely imaged and their lateral variations were determined. The underlying moraine deposit and the bedrock were also identified, thereby yielding an idea of the preferential leaching paths. Considering the inherent complexity of quick-clay mapping, the collected data illustrate the benefit of an integrated approach, and emphasise the need for high resolution, proper imaging, calibration and ultimately joint inversion of the different data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brand EW, Brenner RP (1981) Soft clay engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin T (1993) On the automation of 2D resistivity surveying for engineering and environmental applications. Doctoral thesis, Lund University, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue S, Long M, O’Connor P, Eide-Helle T, Pffaffhuber AA, Rømoen M (2012) Geophysical mapping of quick clay: a case study from Smørgrav, Norway. J Near Surf Geophys, EAGE 10(3):207–219

    Google Scholar 

  • NGF (Norsk Geoteknisk Forening) (1975) Retningslinjer for presentasjon av geotekniske undersøkelser, NGF (Norsk Geoteknisk Forening) (In Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen O (2008) Program for økt sikkerhet mot leirskred – Metode for kartlegging og klassifisering avfaresoner, kvikkleire. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Report 20001008-2 (3rd revision), 24p (In Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Heureux JS (2012) A study of the retrogressive behaviour and mobility of Norwegian quick clay landslides. In: Proceedings of the 11th international and 2nd North American symposium on landslides, Banff

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH (2010) Res2DInv ver 3.59.102. Geoelectrical imaging 2D and 3D. Instruction manual. Geotomo Software. http://www.geotomosoft.com/

  • Løken T (1968) Kvikkleiredannelse og kjemisk forvitring i norske leirer. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Publication 75, pp 19–26 (In Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (1976) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ, Markell AR (1974) Flowslides in sensitive soils. Can Geotech J 11:11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moholdt R (2008) Fossnes på Hvittingfoss, Vurdering av skredfare og sikringstiltak. NGI report, 20071564-2 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Polom U, Hansen L, Sauvin G, L’Heureux JS, Lecomte I, Krawczyk CM, Vanneste M, Longva O (2010) High-resolution SH-wave seismic reflection for characterization of onshore ground conditions in the Trondheim Harbor, Central Norway. In: Miller RD, Bradford JD, Holliger K (eds) Advances in near-surface seismology and ground-penetrating radar. SEG, Tulsa, pp 297–312

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polom U, Druivenga G, Grossmann E, Grüneberg S, Rode W (2011) Transportabler Scherwellenvibrator. Patent application DE 103 27 757 A1, Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenqvist IT (1953) Considerations on the sensitivity of Norwegian quick-clays. Geotechnique 3:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rygg N (1988) Rotary pressure sounding: 20 years of experience. In: DeRuiter (ed) Proceedings of the pen testing, 1988, ISOPT-1, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 453–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvin G (2009) S-wave seismic for geohazards: a case study from Trondheim Harbor. Diploma engineering thesis, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 2009-6-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvin G, Lecomte I, Bazin S, L’Heureux JS, Vanneste M (2013) Towards geophysical and geotechnical integration for quick clay mapping in Norway. J Near Surf Geophys, EAGE 11. doi: 10.3997/1873-0604.2012064

  • Solberg IL, Hansen L, Rønning JS, Haugen E, Dalsegg E, Tønnesen JF (2012) Combined geophysical and geotechnical approach to ground investigations and hazard zonation of a quick clay area, Mid Norway. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavenas F, Flon P, Leroueil S, Lebuis J (1983) Remolding energy and risk of retrogression in sensitive clays. In: Symposium on slopes on soft clays, Linkoping, Swedish Geotechnical Institute Report, No. 17, pp 205–262

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ranajit Ghose for reviewing this paper. The authors also thank Gedco and Sandmeier for providing academic licences (Vista and ReflexW, respectively). The authors acknowledge Nadège Langlet, Sylvain Tissot, Christian Maskrey, Håkon Akerholt, Tor Overskeid, Karine Petrus, Mesay Geletu Gebre, Gunther Druivenga and Berit Paulsen for their help in the field, and the University of Oslo for some of the equipment. Guillaume Sauvin thanks the sponsors of his Ph.D. thesis: the Norwegian Public Roads Administration, the Norwegian National Railway Administration, the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate and International Centre for Geohazards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Sauvin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sauvin, G., Lecomte, I., Bazin, S., L’Heureux, JS., Vanneste, M. (2014). Geophysical Data Integration for Quick-Clay Mapping: The Hvittingfoss Case Study, Norway. In: L'Heureux, JS., Locat, A., Leroueil, S., Demers, D., Locat, J. (eds) Landslides in Sensitive Clays. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7079-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics