Skip to main content

New Horn Rules for Probabilistic Consequence: Is \(\mathrm{O}{+}\) Enough?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 3))

Abstract

In our 2007 paper David and I studied consequence relations that correspond to conditional probability functions above thresholds, the probabilistic consequence relations. We showed that system O is a probabilistically sound system of Horn rules for the probabilistic consequence, and we conjectured that O might also provide a complete axiomatization of the set of finite premised Horn rules for probabilistic consequence relations. In a 2009 paper Paris and Simmonds provided a mathematically complex way to characterize all of the sound finite-premised Horn rules for the probabilistic consequence relations, and they established that the rules derivable from system O are insufficient. In this paper I provide a brief accounts of system O and the probabilistic consequence relations. I then show that O together with the probabilistically sound (Non-Horn) rule known as Negation Rationality implies an additional systematic collection of sound Horn rules for probabilistic consequence relations. I call O together with these new Horn rules ‘O+’. Whether O+ is enough to capture all probabilistically sound finite premised Horn rules remains an open question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    That is, \(p\) satisfies the usual classical probability axioms on sentence of a language for sentential logic: (1) \(p(a) \ge 0\), (2) if \({\vert }\!\!- a\) (i.e. if a is a tautology), then \(p(a) = 1\), (3) if \({\vert }\!\!- \lnot (a\wedge b)\), then \(p(a\vee b) = p(a) + p(b)\); and conditional probability is defined as \(p(a~{\vert }~b) = p(a\wedge b)/p(b)\) whenever \(p(b) > 0\). All of the other usual probabilistic rules follow from these axioms.

  2. 2.

    The systems O and Q, and their probabilistic soundness, were first investigated in (Hawthorne 1996). The more recent paper, (Hawthorne and Makinson 2007), proves important new results about O, Q, and related systems.

  3. 3.

    That is, any set of sound rules for ProbCRs that are in Horn rule form will be satisfied by some relations \({\vert }\!\!\sim \) on all pairs of sentences that are not in ProbCRs. A rule is in Horn rule form just when it is of form, “if \(a_{1} {\vert }\!\!\sim x_{1}, \ldots , a_{n} {\vert }\!\!\sim x_{n}\) , then \(b {\vert }\!\!\sim y\)” (with at most a finite number of premise conditions of form \(a_{1} {\vert }\!\!\sim x_{1}, \ldots , a_{n} {\vert }\!\!\sim x_{n})\), and perhaps also containing side conditions about logical entailments among sentences.

References

  • Hawthorne, J. (1996). On the logic on non-monotonic conditionals and conditional probabilities. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25, 185–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J., & Makinson, D. (2007). The qualitative/quantitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference. Studia Logica, 86, 247–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S., Lehmann, D., & Magidor, M. (1990). Nonmonotonic reasoning preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence, 44, 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinson, D., (1989). General Theory of Cumulative Inference. In M. Reinfrank, J. de Kleer, M. L. Ginsberg, & E. Sandewall (Eds.) Non-Monotonic Reasoning—Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop 1988 (pp. 1–18). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson, D. (1994). General Patterns in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. In Dov M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Non-Monotonic and Uncertainty Reasoning (Vol. 3, pp. 35–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J., & Simmonds, R. (2009). O is not enough. Review of Symbolic Logic, 2, 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Hawthorne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hawthorne, J. (2014). New Horn Rules for Probabilistic Consequence: Is \(\mathrm{O}{+}\) Enough?. In: Hansson, S. (eds) David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics