Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 44))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

Interests are basic social phenomena. What we do as individuals, and what we do as societies, is largely a function of what our interests are, or what we take them to be. Thus one might expect the concept of an interest to play a fairly crucial role in the conceptual structure of theories within the social sciences. Surprisingly enough, however, it does not. Take down any dictionary in the social sciences and you are hardly likely to find any conceptual entry under ‘interest’ (with the exception of compound terms like ‘public interest’1 or ‘interest groups’2)3.And most philosophers of science continue to ignore the topic.

An interest is that by virtue of which reason becomes practical - that is, becomes a cause determining the will.

I. Kant

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • V. Held, The Public Interest and Individual Interests, New York and London 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Fach, “Begriff und Logik des ‘öffentlichen Interesses’”, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 60 (1974), pp. 231–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. B. Truman, The Governmental Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion New York, 1951, 15th ed. 1968, pp. 33ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. König (Ed.), Soziologie, Frankfurt, 2nd ed. 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Bernsdorf (Ed.),Wörterbuch der Soziologie, Stuttgart, 3rd. ed. 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Sills (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vols. I-XVII, New York, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gould and W. L. Kolb (Eds.), A Dictionary of the Social Sciences, New York, 1964, pp. 341ff

    Google Scholar 

  • W. F. Hegel, Siimtliche Werke (Jubiliiumsausgabe), vols. I-XXVI, ed. H. Glockner, Stuttgart, 1927–1940, vol. X, p. 376

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Klaus and M. Buhr [Eds.], Philosophisches Worterbuch, vols. I-II, Leipzig, 8th ed. 1972, vol. I, p. 537

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. MacIver, entry on “Interests”, in: E. R. A. Seligman (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. VIII, New York, 1932, p. 144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. W. Hirsch-Weber, Politik als Interessen konfilikt, Stuttgart, 1969, p. 94

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Fuchs et al. (Eds.), Lexikon zur Soziologie, Opladen, 1973, p. 312

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hoffmeister, Worterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe, Hamburg, 2nd ed. 1955, p. 334

    Google Scholar 

  • H. P. Fairchild (Ed.), Dictionary of Sociology, Totowa, 1973, p. 161

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Eichhorn I et al. (Eds.), Worterbuch der marxistisch-leninistischen Soziologie, Opladen, 1971, p. 228

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Kambartel, “Bemerkungen zum normativen Fundament der Okonomie”, in: J. Mittelstrass (Ed.), Methodologische Probleme einer normativ-kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie, Frankfurt, 1975, p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Kambartel, “Bemerkungen zum normativen Fundament der Ökonomie”, loc. cit., pp. 109f.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Kambartel, “Moralisches Argumentieren. Methodische Analysen zur Ethik”, in: F. Kambartel (Ed.), Praktische Philosophie und konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie, Frankfurt, 1974, pp. 61ff P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen and O. Schwemmer, Konstruktive Logik, Ethik: und Wissenschaftstheorie, Mannheim, 1973, pp. 110f

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bollhagen, Interesse und Gesellschaft, Berlin 1967, p. 41

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Lukacs, Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein. Studie iiber marxistische Dialektik, Berlin, 1923, p. 62

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mittelstrass [Ed.], Methodologische Probleme einer normativkritischen Gesellschaftstheorie, Frankfurt, 1975, pp. 144ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. O. Schwemmer, Philosophie der Praxis. Versuch zur Grundlegung einer Lehre vom moralischen Argumentieren in Verbindung mit einer Interpretation der praktischen Philosophie Kants, Frankfurt, 1971, 1980, p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mittelstrass, J. (1989). Interests. In: Butts, R.E., Brown, J.R. (eds) Constructivism and Science. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0959-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0959-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6921-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0959-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics