Skip to main content

Putting plants in their place: Anthropological approaches to understanding the ethnobotanical knowledge of rainforest populations

  • Chapter
Tropical Rainforest Research — Current Issues

Part of the book series: Monographiae Biologicae ((MOBI,volume 74))

Abstract

Over the last decade or so ethnobotany has assumed a scientific prominence previously denied it. It is endorsed by institutions with a high international profile (Kew, the Royal Geographical Society, WWF, UNDP, UNESCO), has a market value placed upon it by foresters, agronomists, development advisers and pharmacologists, and has become pivotal in preserving the cultural identity and knowledge of indigenous peoples whose traditional way of life is under threat (Posey 1990). Ethnobotanical knowledge has, therefore, become both economic commodity and political slogan. This is particularly true with respect to the plant knowledge of rainforest peoples, as these peoples are often those with the highest media profile. However, in our eagerness to exploit a product and to demonstrate its usefulness, there has been a tendency to oversimplify what ethnobotany entails and just how it can be useful. I argue in this paper that we must not be narrow-minded or simplistic in our conception of ethnobotanical knowledge, and that to take anything less than a broad culturally-contextualised approach may miss the point of the relevance of indigenous knowledge altogether.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ALCORN, J.B. 1981a. Factors influencing botanical resource perception among the Huastec: suggestions for future ethnobotanical enquiry. Journal of Ethnobiology 1:221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALCORN, J. B. 1981b. Huastec noncrop resource management: implications for prehistoric rainforest management. Human Ecology 9:395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARRAU, J. (n.d.). An ethnobotanical guide for anthropological research in Malayo-Oceania. UNESCO Science Cooperation Office for Southeast Asia, (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • BERLIN, B., BREEDLOVE, D. & RAVEN P. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification: an introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking people of the highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, C. H. 1985. Mode of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy. Current Anthropology 26:43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, K. 1992. Medicinal plants, indigenous medicine and conservation of biodiversity in Ghana (GEC 92–36).Norwich: CSERGE Working Papers, UEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BULMER, R. N. H. 1974. Folk biology in the New Guinea Highlands. Social Science Information 13:9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BURKILL, T. H. 1935. A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay peninsula (2 volumes). Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARNEIRO, R. 1978. The knowledge and use of rainforest trees by the Kuikuru Indians of central Brazil. In Ford, R.I. (ed.). The nature and status of ethnobotany. Anthropological Papers 67, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARNEIRO, R.L. 1988. Indians of the Amazonian forest. In Denslow, J. S. and Padoch, C. (eds). People of the tropical rainforest. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARTER, G.F. 1950. Ecology-Geography-Ethnobotany. Scientific Monthly 70:73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONKLIN, H.C. 1954. The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONKLIN, H.C. 1957. Hanunóo agriculture, a report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONKLIN, H.C. 1972. Folk classification: a topically arranged bibliography of contemporary and background reference through 1971. Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENSLOW, J. and PADOCH, C. (eds) 1988. People of the tropical rainforest. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOVE, M.R. 1983a. Forest preference in swidden agriculture. Tropical Ecology 24:122–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOVE, M.R. 1983b. Theories of swidden agriculture and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1:85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUNN, F.L. 1975. Rainforest collectors and traders: a study of resource utilization in modern and ancient Malaya. Monographs of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLEN, R.F. 1982. Environment, subsistence and system: The ecology of small-scale social informations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLEN, R.F. 1985. Patterns of indigenous timber extraction from Moluccan rain forest fringes. Journal of Biogeography 12:559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ELLEN, R.F. 1986. What Black Elk left unsaid: on the illusory images of Green primitivism. Anthropology Today 2:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ELLEN, R.F. 1993. Rhetoric, practice and incentive in the face of the changing times: a case study of Nuaulu attitudes to conservation and deforestation. In Milton, K. (ed.). Environmentalism: the view from anthropology. ASA Monograph 32. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • FORD, R.I. 1978. Ethnobotany: historical diversity and synthesis. In Ford, R.I. (ed.). The nature and status of ethnobotany. Anthropological Papers 67. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOX, R.B. 1952. The Pinatubo Negritos: their useful plants and material culture. Philippine Journal of Science 81:173–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, J.D. 1970. Report on the Iban. LSE Monographs 41. Athlone, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDBERG, C. 1990. Le Savoir Botanique des Bunaq. Percevoir et Classer dans le Haut Lamaknen (Timor, Indonésie). Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Botanique 32. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYS, T. E. 1974. Mauna: Explorations in Ndumba ethnobotany. Ph-D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYS, T. E. 1982. Utilitarian/adaptationist explanations of folk biological classification: some cautionary notes. Journal of Ethnobiology 2: 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEADLAND, T. N. 1987. The wild yam question: how well could independent hunter-gatherers live in a tropical rainforest ecosystem. Human Ecology 15: 463–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOFFMAN, C. 1984. Punan foragers in the trading networks of southeast Asia. In Schrire C. (ed.). Past and present in hunter-gatherer studies. Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICHIKAWA, M. 1992. Traditional use of tropical rainforest by the Mbuti hunter-gatherers in Africa. Pp. 305–317 in Itoigawa, N., Sugiyama, Y., Sackett, G. P. and Thompson, R. K. R. (eds). Topics in primatology: behaviour, ecology and conservation. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • JONES, V. H. 1941. The nature and scope of ethnobotany. Chronica Botanica 6:219–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORAUTA, L., PERNETRA, J. and HEANEY, W. (eds) 1982. Traditional conservation in Papua New Guinea: implications for today (Monograph 16). Institute for Applied Social and Economic Research, Papua New Guinea.

    Google Scholar 

  • PETERS, C. M., GENTRY, A. H. and MENDELSOHN, R. O. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 665–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • POSEY, D. 1988. Kayapó Indian natural-resource management. In Denslow, J. S. and Padoch, C. (eds). People of the tropical rainforest. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • POSEY, D. A. 1990. Intellectual property rights: what is the position of ethnobiology? Journal of Ethnobiology 10: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAMBO, A. T. 1985. Primitive polluters: Semang impact on the Malaysian tropical rainforest ecosystem. Anthropological Papers 76, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • REICHEL-DOLMATOFF, G. 1976. Cosmology as ecological analysis: a view from the rain forest. Man (N.S.) 11: 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • REVEL, N. 1990. Fleurs de Paroles: Histoire Naturelle Palawan. Volumes I and 2. Peeters/SELAF, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, P. 1979. Community environmental knowledge and African rural development. IDS Bulletin 10: 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, P. 1985. Indigenous agricultural revolution: ecology and food production in west Africa. Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, P. 1992. Saving the rain forest? Contested futures in conservation. In Wallman, S. (ed.). Contemporary fixtures: perspectives from social anthropology. ASA Monographs 30. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, P. 1993. Natural symbols and natural history. In Milton, K. (ed.). Environmentalism: the view from anthropology. ASA Monograph 32. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIRLEY, P. 1991. Recovery and utilisation of ethnobotanical knowledge: the Rio Capim, Eastern Amazonia. Final Report: Ethnobotanical exchange between Asia and Amazonia. UNDP, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • TELBAN, B. 1988. The role of medical ethnobotany in ethnomedicine: a New Guinea example. Journal of Ethnobiology 8: 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAYDA, A. P. 1983. Progressive contextualization: methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11: 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellen, R. (1996). Putting plants in their place: Anthropological approaches to understanding the ethnobotanical knowledge of rainforest populations. In: Edwards, D.S., Booth, W.E., Choy, S.C. (eds) Tropical Rainforest Research — Current Issues. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1685-2_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1685-2_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1685-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics