Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 37))

Abstract

The purpose of the present chapter is to discuss the status of wh-phrases as quantificational expressions. In particular, we will address the question of how the wh-expression should be characterized in terms of its quantificational force. We will see that the syntactic and semantic behavior of constructions in Japanese involving the class of words which Kuroda (1965) very pertinently referred to as ‘indeterminate pronominals’ provides an interesting insight to the issue at hand. The ‘indeterminate pronominals’ essentially correspond to wh-expressions.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The attitude represented by Kuroda’s terminology, which carefully avoids identifying wh’s as ‘interrogative pronominals’, appears to be widespread among the traditional Japanese grammarians. Cf. Onoe (1983), for example.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Previous work that discusses constructions exemplified by (3a-d) includes Kuroda (1965), Ohno (1984), Hoji (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See fa. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This distinction in terms of the interrogative marker, though, appears to be independent of the D-/non-D-linked interpretation. That is to say, there are wh-questions ending in no ka which are not D-linked. Cf. Kuno and Masunaga (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For discussion, cf. Saito (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Also Cf. Kuroda (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See fn. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For more on this, cf. Hoji (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. According to May’s (1985) definition of dominate, which is subsumed under his notion of c-command, a maximal projection X dominates a node Y only if every segment of X dominates Y. If the node in question is one created by adjunction, that node does not dominate Y in the sense just defined.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nishigauchi, T. (1990). Construing WH . In: Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1972-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1972-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-0644-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1972-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics