Skip to main content

The Performance of Flame Retardants in Rigid Polyurethane Foam Formulations

  • Chapter
Fire and Cellular Polymers

Summary

The flame retardant properties of rigid polyurethane foam compositions are determined by the type and level of flame retardant, the isocyanate index of the foam and the structure of the polyol.

Three phosphorus-based flame retardant additives are compared using the BS 4735 horizontal burn test and the DIN 4102-B2 vertical burn test in a wide range of polyol types. The results obtained are consistent with the phosphorus content of the additives. Dimethyl methylphosphonate with a phosphorus content of 25% proves to be the most effective flame retardant. Surprisingly, the chlorine content, which accounts for nearly a third of the trismonochloropropyl phosphate molecule, does not appear to exhibit any flame retardant effect above its phosporus content. Reoflam 306, a proprietary halogen-free additive with a phosphorus content of 15.2%, enables polyurethane foams of normal index to be formulated to meet the requirements of DIN 4102-B2 without the addition of a flame retardant polyol.

Both test methods clearly showed that the aromatic-based polyols have inherently better flame retardant properties than the aliphatic-based polyether polyols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. British Standards Institution, Fire tests on building materials and structures. Surface spread of flame test for materials, BS 476, 1971, Part 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association Francaise de Normelisation, Epiradiateur test, NF P92–501, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fire Offices Committee, FOC Wall and Ceiling Lining Test, unpublished, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. British Standards Institution, Horizontal burning characteristics of cellular plastics when subjected to a small flame, BS 4735, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Society for Testing and Materials, Flammability of plastic sheeting and cellular plastics (withdrawn), ASTM D1692-68, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Classification and test methods for building materials, Class B2, DIN 4102,1981, Part 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. British Standards Institution, Oxygen index, BS 2782, 1978, Part 1, Method 141C.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Underwriter’s Laboratories Inc., USA, Horizontal burn test, UL 94HBF, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Classification and test methods for building materials, Class B3, DIN 4102, 1981, Part 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buszard, D.L., Dellar, R.J. (1986). The Performance of Flame Retardants in Rigid Polyurethane Foam Formulations. In: Buist, J.M., Grayson, S.J., Woolley, W.D. (eds) Fire and Cellular Polymers. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3443-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3443-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8041-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3443-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics