Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 18))

  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

When all three partners of the newly formed evaluation firm of DATAFAX, INC., were interviewed for a potential contract by the project directors, the company philosophy soon became clear: data and facts were the same thing — and the only thing. The junior partner, Joe Friday, when asked how they would proceed if awarded the contract replied, “All we want are the facts, ma’am.”1 When the project director inquired about a theoretical base for the evaluation, the second partner, Sherlock Holmes, immediately cautioned, “It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts” (Doyle, 1981, p. 163). Lest Holmes, the most erudite of the partners, be misunderstood, the senior partner and founder of the firm, Thomas Gradgrind, of Dickens fame, reminded the clients, “In this life, we want nothing but Facts, sir; nothing but Facts!” (1981, p. 25).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1982). Designing evaluations of education and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, I. (1976). “Words and deeds: Social science and social policy.” In W.B. Sanders (ed.), The sociologist as detective. An introduction to research methods. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C. (1981). Hard Times. New York: Bantam Books. (Original work published in 1854.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A.C. (1981). “A scandal in Bohemia.” In J. Symons (ed.), The complete adventures of Sherlock Holmes. London: Secker and Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. and Kosecoff, J. (1983). “How to evaluate cost effectiveness.” How to evaluate education programs, 65, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluation of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPierre, R.T. (1928). “Race prejudice: France and England.” Social Forces, 7, 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1974). “Cost effectiveness analysis in evaluation research.” Evaluation Consortium, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A.L. (1967). Folk song in England. Great Britain: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J.S. and Abrahamson, S. (1979). “Effectiveness of continuing medical education: A review of the evidence.” Evaluation and the Health Professions, 2 (3), 251–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G.F. and McDonagh, J.T. (1982). “As I roved out: Folksong collecting as a metaphor for evaluation.” In N.L. Smith (ed.), Communication strategies in evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, P. (1982). Pluto’s Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L.L. and Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1978). How to measure program implementation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G., Jr. (1967). “Examsmanship and the liberal arts: A study in educational epistemology.” In M.C. Beardsley (ed.), Modes of argument. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1973). “The methodology of education.” In B.R. Worthen and J.R. Sanders (eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, California: Charles A. Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1974). “Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation.” In W. J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in education. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P. (1962). The two cultures: And a second look. Glasgow: Blackie and Son, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, J.C., Sackett, D.L., Neufeld, V., Gerrard, B., Rudnick, K.V., and Fraser, W. (1982). “A randomized trial of continuing medical education.” New England Journal of Medicine, 306 (9), 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, R.D. (1981). Introduction to Hard times. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D. (1973). “An introduction to the PDK book: Educational evaluation and decision making.” In B.R. Worthen and J.R. Sanders (eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, California: Charles A. Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D. (1983). “The CIPP model for program evaluation.” In G.F. Madaus, M. Scriven, and D. Stufflebeam (eds.), Evaluation models. Hingham, Massachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (1979). The Medusa and the snail: More notes of a biology watcher. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madaus, G.F. (1985). Data-Collection Problems in Evaluation. In: Abrahamson, S. (eds) Evaluation of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8707-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4986-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics