Skip to main content

The Crisis in the Federation of Metalworkers

  • Chapter
Alphonse Merrheim

Part of the book series: Studies in Social History ((SISH,volume 8))

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

During the years before World War I Alphonse Merrheim found himself in the middle of a crisis that wracked his own federation. After 1912, syndicalists, both inside and outside this organization, pointed to a sense of defeatism that pervaded the Federation of Metalworkers. They noted that a sense of purpose and determination seemed missing from the federation’s activities. Many syndicalisss blamed Merrheim for this state of affairs; they attacked his constant emphasis on trade union matters. This, they believed, had blunted the revolutionary will not only of the Federation of Metalworkers but of the CGT as well. So disenchanted did one metalworkers’ local become, that it expelled Merrheim from its ranks, charging him with being too conservative and cautious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Joseph Braun, Henri Galantus, and Jean Latapie, in OM, May, 1903, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albert Bourchet, in OM, May, 1904, p. l.

    Google Scholar 

  3. UFOM, XIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1905), pp. 245–246

    Google Scholar 

  4. ‘Congrès régional des Ouvriers Métallurgistss de la région du Nord, tenu à Lille, le 19 Mars 1905’, in OM, no. 162, May 1, 1905, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. UFOM, XIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1905), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. CGT, XVe Congrès national corporatif (Amiens, 1906), p. 191

    Google Scholar 

  7. also ibid, see pp. 186–191, for the debate on the issue of unity in the building trades industry.

    Google Scholar 

  8. OM, no. 189, August 1, 1907, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. UFOM, XIIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1907), pp. 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., pp. 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 171 and p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alphonse Merrheim, ‘Vers la fusion’, in OM, October 1, 1908, pp. 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  13. ‘Confédération Générale du Travail-Section des Fédération- Séance du 7 Avril 1908’, in VP, no. 400, May, 31-June 7, 1908, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. CGT, XVIe Congrès national corporatif (Marsellle, 1908), p. 137 (the resolution, and p. 292 (the vote). For the entire debate on this issue

    Google Scholar 

  15. see ibid., pp. 122–148.

    Google Scholar 

  16. FOM, Congrès unitaire des Fédérations des Métallurgistes des Mouleurs, et des Mécaniciens, tenu à Paris, les 28, 29, et 30 Mai 1909 (Paris, n.d. [1909]).

    Google Scholar 

  17. CGT, XVIIe Congrès national corporatif (Toulouse, 1910), pp. 238–257.

    Google Scholar 

  18. FOM, Congrès unitaire (Paris, 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  19. FOM, Compte rendu du ler Congrès national (Paris, 1911), p. 7

    Google Scholar 

  20. APP, B/A 1606, note of September 24, 1908 (file no. 2000 – 1773–2), and AN, F7, 13771, note of May 30, 1909 (‘Congrès unitaire de la Métallurgie’).

    Google Scholar 

  21. AN, F7, 13771, note of May 28, 1909 (‘Congrès unitaire’).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid. note of May 30, 1909 (‘Congrès unitaire’).

    Google Scholar 

  23. For the attack on the CGT, see AN, F7, 12525, note of January 1, 1909; for Ingweillerss criticism of Merrheim, see AN, F7, 13773, note of April 23, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  24. APP, B/A 1606, note of July 23, 1908 (file no. 200–177–2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. APP, B/A 1602, note of December 3, 1908

    Google Scholar 

  26. At one meeting of the CGT’s Confederal Committee, Merrheim stated that the secretaries of his federation were willing to resign if this would facilitate unity. The proposal was not pursued further by anyone. Moreover, given Merrheim’s fierce opposition to suggestions for the limitation of the secretary’s term of office as well as his own ambitions, it is obvious he never seriously entertained this proposal. See ‘Confédération Générale du Travail-Section des Fédérations- Séance du 7 avril 1908’, in VP, no. 400, May 31-June 7, 1908, p. 4. See also UFOM, XIIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1907), pp. 148–150 and pp. 161–161 (for an attack on the concept of permanent secretarie)) and pp. 131–135 and p. 165 (for a rebutta).

    Google Scholar 

  27. UFOM, XIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1905), p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  28. FOM, Rapport moral, administratif, et financier de l’exercice du ler juillet 1909 au 31 mai 1911 (Paris, n.d.[1911]), pp. 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  29. FOM, Compte rendu du 2e Congrès national (Paris, 1913), pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  30. AN, F7, 13771, ‘XIIe Congrès national de la Métallurgie- Compte rendu’, pp. 15–17, and VP, no. 257, September 17–24, 1905, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Louis Niel, ‘Le Parfait syndicalisme’, in VP, no. 258, September 24-October 1, 1905, pp. 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alphonse Merrheim, ‘La Crise syndicaliste’, in Le Mouvement Socialiste, nos. 215–216, Noovember-December, 1909. p. 291; Merrheim’s emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  33. For Galantus’s and Latapie’s resignation, see AN, F7, 13773, note of January 20, 1909, M/2522. See also ibid., note of February 13, 1909, M/2624. For Blanchard’s defeat, see AN, F7, 12765, note of June 2, 1909, and note of Paris, July 2, 1909, M/3329.

    Google Scholar 

  34. AN, F7, 13773, note of Paris, June 25, 1909, M/3296.

    Google Scholar 

  35. FOM, Compte rendu du 2e Congrès national (Paris, 1913), pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  36. UFOM, XIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1905), pp. 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  37. UFOM, XIIIe Congrès national des Ouvriers Métallurgistes (Paris, 1907), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  38. FOM, Compte rendu du 2e Congrès national (Paris, 1913) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid., p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  43. For what follows see Merrheim’s speech to the congress in ibid., pp. 92–98

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., pp. 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid., pp. 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., pp. 164–165.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., pp. 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., pp. 169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., pp. 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid., pp. 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Victor Griffuelhes, in BS, no. 638, January 23, 1913, p. 1; no. 639, January 24, 1913 p. 1; no. 642, January 27, 1913, pp. 1–2; and no. 647, February 1, 1913, p. 1. These articles are reprinted in Le Mouvement Socialiste nos. 247–248, January-February, 1913, pp. 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Griffuelhes, in BS, no. 642, January 27, 1913, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., no. 639, January 24, 1913, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., no. 642, January 27, 1913, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., no. 647, February 1, 1913, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Alphonse Merrheim, in BS, no. 643, January 28, 1913. p. 1; no. 651, February 5, 1913, p. 1; no. 653, February 7, 1913, p. 1; no. 660, February 14, 1913, p. 1; no. 672, February 26, 1913, p. 1. These are reprinted in Le Mouvement Socialiste ,nos. 247–248, January-February, 1913, pp. 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Merrheim, in BS, no. 643, January 28, 1913, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid., no. 660, February 14, 1913, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  63. AN, F7, 13774, note of Paris, March 14, 1914, M/9054.

    Google Scholar 

  64. FOM, Compte rendu du 2e Congrès national (Paris, 1913), pp. 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  65. What follows is covered in Christian Gras, ‘La Fédération des Métaux en 1913–1914 et l’évolution du syndicalisme révolutionnaire français’, in Le Mouvement Social, no. 77 October-December, 1971, pp. 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  66. The expulsion case was also a major topic of discussion in the syndicalist press (see VP during 1913–1914); an important item for the police (see AN, F7, 13774, and F7, 13574, and APP, B/A 1605); an issue at several Executive Committee meetings of the CGT (these are reported in VP); and the subject of a study in Le Mouvement Socialiste (nos. 259–260 January-February, 1914, and nos. 263–264, May-June, 1914).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papayanis, N. (1985). The Crisis in the Federation of Metalworkers. In: Alphonse Merrheim. Studies in Social History, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5155-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5155-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8781-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5155-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics