Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics ((MPAM,volume 6))

Abstract

Symmetry groups generated by charges which obey Gauss’ law are discussed as characteristic features of local gauge quantum field theories. The existence of such symmetry groups in a local quantum field theory leads to very important properties. In particular, unbroken charges obeying Gauss’ law always define superselection rules and their breaking always leads to the Higgs phenomenon, which has therefore a quite general explanation, related to Gauss’ law, without the introduction of Higgs fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. See e.g. Weinberg, S., Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 255 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, C. N., and Mills, R. L., Phys. Rev. 96, 191 (1954).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. This is not only a pedagogical question, but also a crucial one if one wants to investigate general properties of GQFT without relying on perturbation theory, Lagrangian functions etc.; one of the main strategies of general QFT is in fact that of extracting basic properties of Lagrangian QFT, so that one may discuss their relations and their consequences in general.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a more precise meaning of Equation (1) see following sections and Ref. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Strocchi, F., Phys. Rev. D17, 2010 (1978) and references therein to previous papers.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. It need not be stressed here the importance of such a local conservation law (for the charge density), which still retains a meaning even in the case of spontaneously broken symmetry, when the global conservation law fails to exist; the local conservation law also plays a crucial role in understanding symmetries at the level of local fields and the associated Ward identities.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The argument is rather standard at the classical level (see e.g. Strocchi, F., Nuovo Cimento 42, 9 (1966)) and it can be extended to the quantum case by relying on the quantum action principle of Lowenstein and Lam (Ref. 8). (For a more general justification see Note 3). Clearly in the quantization of a classical Lagrangian a certain arbitrariness is involved in specifying the representation of the quantum operators which correspond to the classical fields. For example, in carrying through the renormalization procedure one may completely destroy the group theoretical structures (like Ward identities, etc.) which characterize the classical case and in such a way possibly define a theory which has very little relation with the classical theory. Such relations are instead maintained in the quantum action principle approach of Lowenstein and Lam and it need not be emphasized here that this is the way to define the quantum version of group theoretical structures which exist at the classical level.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lowenstein, J., Commun. Math. Phys. 24, 1 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam, Y-M. P., Phys. Rev. D6, 2145, 2161 (1972); D7, 2945 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, e.g., the excellent review by Swieca, J., ‘Goldstone Theorem and Related Topics.’ In D. Kastler (ed,). Cargése Lectures in Physics, Vol. 4, New York, Gordon and Breach, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari, R., Picasso, L.E., and Strocchi, F., Commun. Math. Phys. 35, 25 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Strocchi, F., Phys. Rev. D17, 2010 (1978).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. For a more precise definition of locality and positivity in QFT see Streater, R. F., and Wightman, A. S., PCT, Spin and Statistics and All That, Benjamin, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a more detailed discussion we refer to any standard textbook on quantum electrodynamics, for example Schweber, S., Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Harper and Row, New York, 1964; or Mandl, F., Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Interscience, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Strocchi, F., and Wightman, A. S., J. Math. Phys. 15, 2198 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrari, R., Picasso, L. E., and Strocchi, F., Commun. Math. Phys. 35, 25 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maison, D., and Zwanziger, D., Nucl. Phys. 91B, 425 (1975).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrari, R., Picasso, L. E., and Strocchi, F., Nuovo Cimento 39A, 1 (1977).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. For a more detailed and rigorous discussion we refer the reader to Ref. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The importance of this property of causality or locality has been emphasized by Haag, R., and Kastler, D., J. Math. Phys. 5, 848 (1964).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. The proof has purposely been oversimplified in order not to obscure the underlying physical ideas. Actually, since by the results discussed in Section 3, Gauss’ law can be required to hold only when one takes matrix elements between physical states one should carefully check that this is the case in the above derivation. To this purpose one has to remember that, since ‘longitudinal modes’ are not observable, matrix elements of observable operators taken between vectors of ℋ ’ should not change if one makes a gauge transformation Ф → Ф + X,X being a vector of ℋ ’ containing longitudinal modes. Hence >Ψ, AФ = Ψ,A(Ф + X)>, which implies >Ψ, A Ф> = >Ψ, A (Ф + X)> = 0 For a more detailed discussion we refer the reader to Ref. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a more detailed discussion see Ref. 5, Sect. IV, where also the relevance of this feature for the solution of the infrared problem is emphasized.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Such a theorem requires the existence of massless particles (Goldstone bosons) with the quantum numbers of the broken generators and there does not seem to be any candidate for such particles, the only experimentally observed massless boson being the photon, which has the feature of being associated to the unbroken internal symmetry group generated by the electric charge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Strocchi, Commun. Math. Phys. 56, 57 (1977).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. For a more accurate treatment see Ref. 20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. Tirapegui

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strocchi, F. (1981). Gauss’ Law in Local Quantum Field Theory. In: Tirapegui, E. (eds) Field Theory, Quantization and Statistical Physics. Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8368-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8368-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8370-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8368-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics