Abstract
Since I am very much in agreement with Professor Taylor about his general understanding of the importance of Hegel, and the importance of Hegel’s conception of Sittlichkeit generally, I have decided to limit my remarks to the second part of his paper. This part attempts to understand the crisis of the modern democratic liberal bourgeois world in terms of the break-up of a traditional Sittlichkeit in Western societies. Here I am not in complete agreement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avineri, S. (1978). Comments. In: Yovel, Y. (eds) Philosophy of History and Action. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9365-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9365-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9367-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9365-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive