Abstract
The last thirty years have seen enormous changes in the status of women in research universities. Barely tolerated in many such institutions even as students at the beginning of the period, women were essentially absent from the ranks of ftill professors, and were only small fractions of all faculty ranks. In 1977 in chemistry departments, for example, women made up just 1.9 percent of all faculty ranks in the top 25 universities (ordered by research and development expenditures) and in mathematics that pro- portion was 2.7 percent (National Academy of Sciences 1979:68). The Women’s Caucus of the American Physical Society published what came to be known as the Zeros Table, listing the great majority of research departments that had no women faculty at all. A chemistry department chairman in a flagship state imiversity declared that “over my dead body” would there ever be a tenured woman in his department. Just over twenty years later there are women on the permanent as well as the probationary faculties of every imiversity, in the arts, sciences, and humanities, in medical, law, and engineering schools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahem, Nancy C., and Elizabeth L. Scott. 1981. Career outcomes in a matched sample of men and women Ph.D.s. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Babco, Eleanor L. 2000. Professional women and minorities. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.
Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education. 1975. Making affirmative action work in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chamberlain, Mariam K., ed. 1988. Women in academe: Progress and prospects. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Evangelauf, Jean. 1994. A new Carnegie classification. The Chronicle of Higher Education XL (April 6).
Harris, Ann Sutherland. 1970. The second sex in academe. AAUPBulletin 56 3): 283–295.
Haven, Elizabeth W., and Dwight H. Horch. 1972. How college students finance their education. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Hornig, Lilli S. 1984. Women in science and engineering: Why so few? Technology Review 87 (Nov/Dec): 30–41.
Kennedy, Donald. 1997. Academic duty, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Lawler, Andrew. 2001. College heads pledge to remove barriers. Science 291 (February): 806.
Leap, Terry L. 1993. Tenure, discrimination, and the courts. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
Lester, Richard A. 1974. Antibias regulation of universities: Faculty problems and their solutions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Long, Janice, 2001. Gender equity: Promises made. Chemical and Engineering News 79 (February 5): 8.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1999. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
McGuigan, Dorothy Gies. 1970. A dangerous experiment: 100 years of women at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Nadis, Steve. 2001. Top research universities face up to gender bias. Nature 409 (8 February): 653.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee on the Education and Employment of Women in Science and Engineering. 1979. Climbing the academic ladder: Doctoral women scientists in academe. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Olson, Keith W. 1974. The G.I. Bill, the veterans, and the colleges. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Sanderson, Allen R., et al. 1999. Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 1998. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
Special Subcommittee on Education, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, 93rd Congress, Second Session. 1975. Hearings: Civil rights obligations. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Tuckman, Howard, Susan Coyle, and Yupin Bae. 1990. On time to the doctorate: A study of the increased time to complete doctorates in science and engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hornig, L.S. (2003). Introduction. In: Hornig, L.S. (eds) Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0007-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0007-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47351-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0007-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive