Abstract
As Professor von Wright’s title indicates, his paper is concerned with two distinguishable questions, the first having to do with formal logic, the second with the possibility of “fruitful applications to ethics or to legal theory or to the social scientists’ study of norms”. His discussion seems to make it quite clear to me, at any rate, that the two investigations are separable, though of course they do impinge upon each other, and I agree that a study of the relations between the two is worth the effort. But I would like to make a couple of remarks at the outset about how I conceive the distinction between the two topics to be drawn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
The formal analysis of normative systems. Technical report # 2, Office of Naval Research, Group Psychology Branch, Contract SAR/Nonr-609(16),
New Haven, 1956. [Reprinted in The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. by Nicholas Rescller), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967.]
‘Logic, Norms, and Roles’, Ratio 4 (1962) 36–49.
‘Some Nasty Problems in the Formal Logic of Ethics’, Nous 6 (1967) 345–360.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1969 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, A.R. (1969). Comments on Von Wright’s ‘Logic and Ontology of Norms’. In: Davis, J.W., Hockney, D.J., Wilson, W.K. (eds) Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9614-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9614-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9616-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9614-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive