Abstract
Over the past three decades, teachers, researchers and policy makers have become increasingly aware of differences in the participation and achievement of girls and boys in school mathematics and science. Significant amounts of research have focussed on this issue, and associated initiatives have been developed, usually with the explicit aim of increasing the participation of girls in these subjects. This work has contributed to our understanding of the area and has affected the educational and career opportunities of some girls. However, we believe that the scope and extent of these changes have been circumscribed by a limited conceptualisation of gender.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnes, M. (1991). Investigating change: An introduction to calculus for Australian schools, Melbourne, Curriculum Corporation.
Barnes, M., Plaister, R. & Thomas, A. (1984). Girls count in mathematics and science: A handbook for teachers, Sydney, Mathematical Association of New South Wales.
Burton, L. (ed.) (1986). Girls into maths can go, Holt, London, Rinehart and Winston.
Burton, L. (ed.) (1990). Gender and mathematics. An international perspective, London, Cassell.
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research, London, Falmer Press.
Dekkers, J., de Laeter, J.R. & Malone, J.A. (1986). Upper secondary school science and mathematics enrolment patterns in Australia, 1970-1985, Perth, Curtin University of Technology.
Doron, R. (1991). ‘Gender similarities and dissimilarities in prediction of academic achievements by psychometric tests among Israeli practical engineers’, in L.J. Rennie, L.H. Parker and G.M. Hildebrand (eds.). Action for equity: The second decade. Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference, Perth, National Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology, 544–552.
Ethington, C.A. (1992). ‘Gender differences in a psychological model of mathematics achievement’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23(2), 166–181.
Fennema, E. (1993). ‘Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics’, in E. Fennema and G. Leder (eds.). Mathematics and gender, Brisbane, University of Queensland Press, 169–187.
Gianello, L. (ed.) (1988). Getting into gear, gender inclusive teaching strategies in science, Canberra, Curriculum Development Centre.
Gray, J.A. (1981). ‘A biological basis for the sex differences in achievement in science’, in A. Kelly (ed.), The missing half: Girls and science education, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 43–58.
Grosz, E. (1990). ‘Conclusion: A note on essentialism and difference’, in S. Gunew (ed.), Feminist knowledge, critique and construct, London, Routledge, 332–344.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis, London, Falmer Press.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests, second edition, London, Heinemann.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
Johnston, J. & Dunne, M. (1991, April). Gender, mathematics and science: Evading the issues or confronting new questions, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Jones, M.G. (1991). ‘Competitive science: Gender differences in the physical and biological sciences’, in L.J. Rennie, L.H. Parker and G.M. Hildebrand (eds.), Action for equity: The second decade. Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference, Perth, National Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology, 261–269.
Keeves, J. (ed.) (1992). The IEA study of science III: Changes in science education and achievement: 1970 to 1984, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
Kelly, A. (1987). ‘Why girls don’t do science’, in A. Kelly (ed.), Science for girls?, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 12–17.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Leder, G.C. (1974). ‘Sex differences in mathematics: Problem appeal as a function of problem context’, Journal for Educational Research (67), 351–353.
Leder, G.C. (1976). ‘Contextual setting and mathematical performance’, Australian Mathematics Teacher 32(4), 119–127; 32(5), 165-173.
Leder, G.C. (1982). ‘Mathematics achievement and fear of success’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1(2), 124–135.
Lewis, S. & Davies, A. (1988). Girls and maths and science teaching: Professional development manual, Canberra, Curriculum Development Centre.
Lock, R. (1992). ‘Gender and practical skill performance in science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching (29), 227–241.
Megaw, W.J. (1991). ‘Gender distribution in the world’s physics departments’, in L.J. Rennie, L.H. Parker and G.M. Hildebrand (eds.), Action for equity: The second decade. Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference, Perth, National Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology, 604–612.
Murphy, P. (1991). ‘Gender differences in pupils’ reactions to practical work’, in B. Woolnough (ed.). Practical science, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 112–122.
Phillips, D.C. (1987). Philosophy, science and social inquiry: Contemporary methodological controversies in social science and related applied fields of research, Oxford, Pergamon.
Popper, K.R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery, London, Hutchinson.
Reilly, B. & Morton, M. (1991). ‘Performance in a nationwide mathematics examination at tertiary entrance level’, in L.J. Rennie, L.H. Parker and G.M. Hildebrand (eds.), Action for equity: The second decade. Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference, Perth, National Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology, 301–309.
Sherman, J. (1983). ‘Girls talk about mathematics and their future: A partial replication’, Psychology of Women Quarterly (7), 338–342.
Sjøberg, S. & Imsen, G. (1988). ‘Gender and science education I’, in P. Fensham (ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education, London, Falmer Press, 218–248.
Smith, I. (1964). Spatial ability: Its education and social significance, San Diego, CA, Robert P. Knapp.
Stanley, L. (1990). Feminist praxis, London, Routledge.
Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Walkerdine, V. (1984). ‘Developmental psychology and the child centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education’, in J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn and V. Walkerdine, Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, London, Methuen, 153–202.
Walkerdine, V. & The Girls and Mathematics Unit (1989). Counting girls out, London, Virago Press.
Willis, S. (1989). ‘Real girls don’t do maths’: Gender and the construction of privilege, Geelong, Australia, Deakin University Press.
Willis, S. (1995). ‘Gender reform through school mathematics’, in P. Rogers and G. Kaiser (eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture, London, Falmer Press, 186–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnston, J., Dunne, M. (1996). Revealing Assumptions: Problematising Research on Gender and Mathematics and Science Education. In: Parker, L.H., Rennie, L.J., Fraser, B.J. (eds) Gender, Science and Mathematics. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0143-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0143-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3582-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0143-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive