Skip to main content

Testing strategy and legal requirements

  • Chapter
Biodegradability of Surfactants

Abstract

The selection of a suitable test for assessing primary biodegradability is straightforward if the surfactant is sufficiently soluble. The OECD Screening test (Ch. 3: 3.3.1) is first applied and if the percentage removal is more than 80% no further testing is required (Table 4.1). Surfactants which are degraded by less than 80% are then subjected to the Confirmatory test (activated sludge) procedure (Ch. 3: 3.3.2) and the value of percentage removal obtained is taken as that which would occur in the environment. (USA practice is different, see Section 4.3.3) In the EC a surfactant not reaching >90% in the Confirmatory test may not be marketed (Table 4.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birch, R.R. and Fletcher, R.J. (1991) The application of dissolved inorganic carbon measurements to the study of aerobic biodegradability. Chemosphere 23, 507–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boatman, R., Cunningham, S.L. and Ziegler, D.A. (1986) A method for measuring the biodegradation of organic chemicals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 5, 233–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1982) Commission of the European Communities. First Ring Test: Respirometry method, Degradation Accumulation sub-group, Ring Test Programme, June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1985) Commission of the European Communities. Second Ring Test: Respirometry method, Degradation Accumulation sub-group, Ring Test Programme, 1983–1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 67/548 (1967) Dangerous substances — classification, packaging and labelling. Off. J.E.C. 196, 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 73/404 (1973a) On the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to detergents. Off. J.E.C. L347, 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 73/405 (1973b) Relating to methods of testing the biodegradability of anionic surfactants. Off. J.E.C. L347, 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 79/831 (1979) Amending 67/548 EC for the sixth time — dangerous substances — classification, packaging and labelling. Off. J.E.C. L259, 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 82/242 (1982a) Relating to methods of testing the biodegradability of non-ionic surfactants. 31 March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 82/243 (1982b) Relating to the methods of testing the biodegradability of anionic surfactants. 31 March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1986). Guiding principles for a strategy for biodegradability testing. DG Xl/841/86, 9 pp. (being revised).

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 92/32. (1992) 7th Amendment to Directive 67/548. Off. J.E.C. L154 Vol. 35, 30 April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Directive 92/69. (1992) Annex. Compendium of test methods. Off. J.E.C. L383A Vol. 35, 29 Dec 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Regulation on Existing Substances 793/93. (1993) Off. J.E.C. L84/1, 5 April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1994) Technical Guidance Document: Risk Assessment of New Notified Substances, May, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • EINECS (1987) European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances, Advance Edition. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, D.M., Kramer, A., Jameson, C.W., Mazzochi, P.H. and Bailey, W.J. (1978) Structural factors influencing the biodégradation of imides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35, 51–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerike, P., Holtmann, W. and Jasiak, W. (1984) A test for detecting recalcitrant metabolites. Chemosphere 13, 121–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office) (1978a) Statutory Instruments, No. 564. The Detergents (Composition) Regulations, 1978, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1978b) Statutory Instruments, The Detergents (Composition) (Amendment) Regulations, 1978, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1984) Statutory Instruments No. 1369. The Detergents (Composition) (Amendment) Regulations, 1984, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO Statutory Instruments No. 560. The Detergents (Composition) (Amendment) Regulations 1986, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1994) How to report data on existing chemical substances. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.J. (1980) Role of biodegradation kinetics in predicting environmental fate, In Biotransformation and Fate of Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment, eds. A.W. Maki, K.J. Dickson and J. Cairns, Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC, pp. 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.J. (1983) Comparison of biodegradation rates in laboratory screening studies with rates in natural waters. Residue Rev. 85, 159–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1976) (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Determination of the biodegradability of surfactants used in synthetic detergents. Paris, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1980) Chemicals Group. Report on chemicals testing programme, degradation, accumulation — Final report. Berlin and Tokyo. Paris, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1981) Chemicals group. Guidelines for testing chemicals. Paris, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Communities (1984) Tests for Degradation. Office for Official Publications. L2985, Luxembourg. L 251, pp. 160–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Communities (1988) Methods for the determination of ecotoxicology. Office for Official Publications L2985, Luxembourg. L 133, pp. 88–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDA (1965) (Soap and Detergent Association). A procedure and standard for the determination of the biodegradability of alkyl benzene sulfonate and linear alkylate sulfonate. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 42, 986–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struijs, J. (1990) A proposal to screen surfactants for ultimate biodegradability. Paper presented at meeting on Ultimate Biodegradability, Expert Group on Detergents and the Environment, Zeist, The Netherlands, 9 November, pp. 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struijs, J. and Stoltenkamp, J. (1990) Headspace determination of evolved carbon dioxide in a biodegradability screening test. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 19, 204–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, C.J. (1990) Intended objectives, scope and environmental benefits of ultimate biodegradability of detergent surfactants. Paper presented at meeting on Ultimate Biodegradability, Expert Group on Detergents and the Environment, Zeist, The Netherlands, 9 November, pp. 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weytjens, D., Van Ginneken, I. and Painter, H.A. (1994) The recovery of carbon dioxide in the Sturm text for ready biodegradability, Chemosphere, 28, 801–812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Painter, H.A. (1995). Testing strategy and legal requirements. In: Karsa, D.R., Porter, M.R. (eds) Biodegradability of Surfactants. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1348-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1348-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4588-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1348-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics