Abstract
There is only one analogy in the law, namely the analogy between legal reality and non-legal reality. “Law and Reality” is in that regard a tricky expression: the conjunction is likely to deceive us, because it conceals the analogy. But the analogy remains a basic operation which establishes the legal discourse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Dworkin: “Law as Interpretation”, in: W. Mitchell, ed.: The Politics of Interpretation, 1983. p. 249. Jan M. Broekman: “Recht en Structuralisme” in R & R, Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie,1973. II,Nr2.
Jan M. Broekman:“Text als Institution”, in:Rech als Sinn und als Institution, Beiheft 6 Rechstheorie, Mayer-Malay, Weinberger, strasser (eds.), 1984, p. 158f.-id. -:“Zur Ontologie des juristischen Sprechakts”,in:Formalismus und PhNnomenologie im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, Festgabe für Alois Troller, Krawietz & Ott (eds.), Berlin, 1987, p. 237f.
K. Hedwig: Sphaera lucis. “Studien zur Intelligibilität des Seinden im Kontext der Mittelalterlichen Lichtspekulation”, Münster, 1980, and A. Abécassis: La Lumière dans la Pensè Juive, Paeis, 1988.
Jan M. Broekman: “Sprechakt, Norm und Institution”, in: Theorie der Normen.. Festgabe für Ota Weinberger, Krawietz, Schelsky, Winkler, Schramm (eds.), Berlin, 1984, p.26f.-id. -:“Juristischer Diskurs und Rechtsheorie” in: Rechstheorie, Bd 11, Nr 1, 1980.
M. Krygier: “Law as Tradition”, in: Philosophy of Law and History of Humnan Thought, IVR World congress, Athens, 1985, Panou et al. (eds),ARSP, Suppl. II, 1988, p. 179f.
R. Cross: Precedent in English Law, Oxford, 1979, pp. 183, 188.
Jan M. Broekman: “Norm en redelijke verwachting”, in: Rechtstheorie & Rechtsfilosophie, R. & R., 1987, Nr. 3; - id -: “Racionalidad jurídica, norma y accion”, in: Boletin Asociacion Argentina de Filosofìa del Derecho, 1987, V, no. 46, p. 1.
L. J. Goddard: Hansen v. Weaimouth Coal Co. , 1939, 3 All E. R. , 47, p. 54, Cross; op. cit. p. 188.
Cross, op. cit. , pp. 182, 183. See: Edward H. Levi: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Chicago, 1949.
P. S. Atiyah & R. S. Summers: Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law. A Comparative Study in Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory and Legal Institutions, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987.
Jan M. Broekman: “The Minimum Content of Positivism” in: Rechtstheorie, 1985, Nr. 16, p. 349f.
R. M. Unger: The Critical Legal Studies Movement, Harvard U. P.f 1985, p. 8.
J. Esser: Vorverständnis und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung, Frankfurt/M., 1970, p. 107.
Jan M. Broekman: “Retch en Redelijkheid”, in: H. Parret (ed.): In alle Redelijkheid, Boom, Meppel & Amsterdam, 1989, p. 153f.
D. N. MacCormick: Law as an Institutional fact, Edinburgh, 1973; O. Weinberger: “Die Norm als Gedanke und Realität”, in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht, 1970, Nr. 20, p. 203f.; D. N. MacCormick & O. Weinberger: Grundlagen des Institutionalistischen Rechtspositivismus,. Berlin, 1985.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Sceience+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broekman, J.M. (1991). Analogy in the Law. In: Nerhot, P. (eds) Legal Knowledge and Analogy. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3260-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3260-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5438-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3260-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive