Abstract
The envelope function theory (EFT) originally proposed by G. Bastard [1] for the calculation of quantum well electronic properties has become very popular because, in spite of its remarkable simplicity, no quantitative or qualitative breakdown of its predictions has been reported until very recently. The EFT has been widely used not only to evaluate bare ≪ first order ≫ electronic properties, which was its original motivation, but also to predict many refined effects, such as QW polaritons [2], second order optical nonlinearities [3] or spin-relaxation phenomena [4,5]. The classical EFT is based on a somewhat simplified version of the 8x8 k.p hamiltonian describing the electronic properties of bulk III-V or II-VI semiconductors having the zinc-blend structure [6], to which scalar potentials describing the shifts of the band extrema at interfaces, and an eventual external potential are added [1]. Here, we consider exclusively the situation of heterostructures grown along the (001) axis. A characteristic feature of the EFT is that the projection Jz of the angular momentum on the quantification axis z is a good quantum number at the zone center, i.e. when the in-plane wavevector kt= 0. In other words, the heavy hole states | 3/2 ± 3/2〉 do not couple to the Jz = ±1/2 light particle states at kt= 0. This remains true even if the quantum well potential is asymmetric, as for instance when an axial electric field is present. Biaxial strain due to a possible lattice mismatch does not change this result [7], which contrasts with the classical group theoretical result stating that (neglecting effects associated with the integer or half-integer character of the layer thicknesses [8]) the point groups of symmetric and asymmetric quantum wells are respectively D2d and C2v [9–11].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B24, 5693 (1981)
G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B25, 7584 (1982).
See also the textbook « wave mechanics applied to semiconductor heterostructures » (les Editions de Physique, les Ulis, 1992)
See for instance L. Andreani, A. d’Andrea and R. del Sole, Phys. Lett. A168, 451 (1992)
J. Khurghin, Phys. Rev. B38, 4056 (1988)
T. Uenoyama and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3070 (1990)
R. Ferreira and G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B43, 9687 (1991)
See G.E. Pikus and A.N. Titkov, « Spin relaxation under optical orientation in semiconductors », in « Optical Orientation », edited by F. Meier and B.P. Zakharchenya (Elsevier, 1984)
See for instance J.Y. Marzin, J.M. Gérard, P. Voisin and J.A. Brum, «Optical studies of strained III-V heterolayers » in Semiconductors and Semimetals vol. 32 (Academic Press, 1990)
Yu. E. Kitaev, A.G. Panfilov, P. Tronc and R.A. Evarestov, J. of Physics Condensed Matter 9, 257 (1997)
D.L. Smith and C. Mailhiot, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 173 (1990)
P.V. Santos, P. Etchegoin, M. Cardonna, B. Brar and H. Kroemer, Phys. Rev. B50, 8746 (1994)
D. Vakhshoori, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 259(1994)
B-F. Zhu and Y.C. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 50, 11932 (1994)
C. Gourdon and Ph. Lavallard, Phys. Rev. B46, 4644 (1992)
S.H. Kvok, H.T. Grahn, K. Ploog and R. Merlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 973 (1992)
D. Vakhshoori and R.E. Leibenguth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1045 (1995)
W. Seidel, P. Voisin, J.P. André and F. Bogani, Solid State Electronics 40, 729 (1996)
O. Krebs, W. Seidel, J.P. André, D. Bertho, C. Jouanin and P. Voisin, to appear in Semicond. Sci. Technol. Lett. (1997)
E. L. Ivchenko, A. Yu. Kaminski and U. Rössler, Phys. Rev. B54, 5852 (1996)
O. Krebs and P. Voisin, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1829 (1996)
W. Seidel, O. Krebs, P. Voisin, J.C. Harmand, F. Aristone and J.F. Palmier, Phys. Rev. B55, 2274 (1997)
Y. Foulon and C. Priester, Phys. Rev. B45, 6259 (1992)
E.L. Ivchenko and A. Toropov, preprint
More precisely, we define | j> = 1/2| ±(X+Y)+Z>, 1/2| ±(X-Y)-Z> and Pj =| j> <j|
This is obviously an over-simplification, in fact only an image, since dipole corrections and local strain effects are not taken into account. The central idea is to affect to each half-monolayer the average valence band potential.
S. Chelles, R. Ferreira and P. Voisin, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 10, 105 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krebs, O., Voisin, P., Voos, M. (1998). Giant In-Plane Optical Anisotropy of Semiconductor Heterostructures with No-Common-Atom. In: García, N., Nieto-Vesperinas, M., Rohrer, H. (eds) Nanoscale Science and Technology. NATO ASI Series, vol 348. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5024-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5024-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6109-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5024-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive