Skip to main content

Organizing experimenting farmers for participation in agricultural research and technology development

  • Chapter
Resource Management in Rice Systems: Nutrients

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 81))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

Experimenting farmers are an important resource in on-farm testing, adaptation, and dissemination of new technologies, especially in resource-poor, highly heterogeneous areas. In Southern Colombia, farmers’ research committees (Comites de Investigacion Agropecuaria Local or CIAL) were formed and used to mobilize local leadership among farmers to take responsibility for experimenting with technologies not known in their community. The CIALs were trained in participatory diagnosis and problem definition, planning and evaluation, and, ultimately, monitoring of adaptive technology testing and dissemination. It is possible to institutionalize this responsibility with farmers who often provide “hard-data” from farmer-managed adaptive research. Results show that current costs and coverage of CIAL approach compare favorably with some state or private sector systems, although the basis for comparison is very limited. A favorable cost structure is clearly related to the demonstrated effectiveness of paraprofessionals such as support-farmers, for scaling up and for achieving devolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashby J A, Sperling L (1994) Institutionalizing participatory client driven research and technology development in agriculture. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network Paper No. 49. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby J, Quiros C A, Rivera Y (1987) Farmer participation in on-farm varietal trials. Agricultural Administration Network Discussion Paper No. 21. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axinn G (1994) Responses to Newsletter 29. In Agricultural Research and Extension Network Newsletter 30. Overseas Development Institute, London. 18 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington A J, Merrill-Sands D, Farrington. J (1994) Farmer and community organizations in agricultural research and extension: functions, impacts and questions. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network Paper No. 47. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg T (1993) The science of plant breeding—support of alternative to traditional practices. In de Boef W, Amanor K, Wellard K (Eds.) Cultivating knowledge, genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1994) Foreword to Beyond farmer first. Scoones I, Thompson J (Eds.) Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater M (1994a) Knowledge, consciousness and prejudice. In Scoones I, Thompson J (Eds) Beyond farmer first. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater M (1994b) Developing interaction and understanding: RRA and farmer research groups in Zambia. In Scoones I, Thompson J (Eds.) Beyond farmer first. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington J, Martin A (1988) Farmer participation in agricultural research: a review of concepts and practices. Agricultural Administration Unit Occasional Paper No. 9. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardon J J, de Boef W S (1993) Linking farmers and breeders in local crop development. In de Boef W, Amanor K, Wellard K (Eds.) Cultivating knowledge, genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., London, p 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich G, Worman F, Koketso C (1991) Integrating FPR with conventional on farm research programs: an example from Botswana. J. Farming Syst. Res. Ext. 2:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot C (1987) Indigenous research and on-farm trials. Agricultural Administration and Extension, p 2479–2489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot C, Barker R (1988) On farm trials: a survey of methods. Agricultural Administration and Extension, p 3015–3023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattee AZ, Lasalle T (1994) Diverse and limited: farmers’ organizations in Tanzania. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network Paper No. 50. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill-Sands D, Biggs S D, Bingen R J Ewell P T, McAllister J L, Poats S R (1991) Integrating on-farm research into national agricultural research systems: lessons for research policy. Organization and management. In Tripp R (Ed.) Planned change in farming systems: progress in on-farm research. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. p 287–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchagata M G, de Reynal V, Verga Jr. I P (1994) Building a dialogue between researchers and small farmers: the Tocantins Agro Ecology Centre (CAT) in Brazil. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Paper No. 50 d. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushita T A (1993) Strengthening the informal seed system in communal areas of Zimbabwe. In de Boef W, Amanor K, Wellard K (Eds.). Cultivating knowledge, genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimlos T J, Savage R F (1991) Successful soil conservation in the Ecuadorian Highlands. J. Soil Water Conserv. September–October, p. 341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okali C, Sumberg V, Farrington. J (1994) Battlefields and trial plots: rhetoric and reality of farmer participatory research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachico D, Ashby J A, Sanint L R (1994) Natural resource and agricultural prospects for the hillsides of Latin America. Annual report, 1993–1994. CIAT Hillside Program, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Palmira, p 283–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravnborg H (1994) Methodology for identifying different levels of well-being, and their distribution. Internal Discussion Paper. CIAT Hillside Program, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Palmira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards P (1989) Agriculture as a performance. In Chambers Pacey R A, Thrupp L A (Eds.) Farmer First: Farmer innovations and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAG (1989) E1 Cauca: tierras de progreso. SAG, Popayan, Cauca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas M A (1994) The technicians only believe in science and cannot read the sky: the cultural dimension of the knowledge conflict in the Andes. In Scoones I, Thompson J (Eds.). Beyond farmer first. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz L A (1994) The role of the private sector in agricultural extension: economic analysis and case studies. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network Paper No. 48. Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling L, Loevinhson M, Ntabomvura B (1993) Rethinking the farmers’ role in plant breeding: local bean experts and extension selection in Rwanda. Exp. Agric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worede M, Mekbib H (1993) Linking genetic resource conservation to farmers in Ethiopia. In de Boef W, Amanor K, Wellard K (Eds) Cultivating knowledge, genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

V. Balasubramanian J. K. Ladha G. L. Denning

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashby, J.A., Gracia, T., Del Pilar Guerrero, M., Quiros, C.A., Roa, J.I., Beltran, J.A. (1999). Organizing experimenting farmers for participation in agricultural research and technology development. In: Balasubramanian, V., Ladha, J.K., Denning, G.L. (eds) Resource Management in Rice Systems: Nutrients. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5078-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5078-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6133-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5078-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics