Abstract
The ideas that underlie the title of this chapter have been part of a familiar debate in education, namely that of the contrast of content and process. In both science and mathematics similar arguments have taken place, and these debates represent a healthy examination of, not only the aims of science and mathematics education, but the teaching and learning issues, and as such they reflect the relative maturity of these subject areas. Even in technology education, which is still in its infancy as a subject, echoes of these debates exist and there are contrasts of approaches to the balance of process and content across the world. The ‘debate’ in technology is evangelical in nature, with for example, proponents making claims for problem-solving approaches as a basis for teaching with few accounts and almost no empirical research of what actually happens in classrooms. There is insufficient consideration of the learning issues behind this, or other proposals, and it is timely to turn our attention to student learning. This article examines the nature of technological knowledge and what we know about learning related to it. The article argues that learning procedural and conceptual knowledge associated with technological activity poses challenges for both technology educators and those concerned with research on learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R.: 1987, ‘Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-Method Solutions’, Psychological Review 94, 192–210.
Anderson, J. R.: 1990, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (Third edition), W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Assessment of Performance Unit (APU): 1991, The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology, HMSO, London.
Bissell, C. C. & Dillon, C. R.: 1993, ‘Back to the Backs of Envelopes’, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 10 September, p. 16.
Buccarelli, L. L.: 1994, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Clancey, W. J.: 1994, A Tutorial on Situated Learning, Institute for Research on Learning (mimeograph), Palo Alto, CA.
Cross, N., Naughton, J. & Walker, D.: 1986, ‘Design Method and Scientific Method’, in A. Cross & R. McCormick (eds.), Technology in Schools, The Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 19–33.
Davis, R. B.: 1986, ‘Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: A Summary Analysis’, in Hiebert (1986, pp. 265–300).
Design Council: 1996, Maths by Design, Design Council, London.
Dillon, C: 1994, ‘Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems — An Overview’, Studies in Science Education 23, 39–57.
Duell, O. K.: 1986, ‘Metacognitive Skills’, in G. D. Phye & T. Andre (eds.), Cognitive Classroom Learning: Understanding, Thinking, and Problem Solving, Academic Press, Orlando, 205–242.
Glaser, R.: 1984, ‘Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge’, American Psychologist 39(2), 93–104.
Glaser, R.: 1992, ‘Expert Knowledge and Processes of Thinking’, in D. F. Halpern (ed.), Enhancing Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 63–75.
Gott, S. H.: 1988, ‘Apprenticeship Instruction for Real-World Tasks: The Coordination of Procedures, Mental Models and Strategies’, in E. Z. Rothkopf (ed.), Review of Research in Education 15 1988-89, American Educational Research Association, Washington DC, 97–169.
Gott, R & Murphy, P: 1987, Assessing Investigations at Ages 13 and 15, Association for Science Education, Hatfield.
Greeno, J. G. et al.: 1994, The Situativity of Learning: Prospects for Synthesis in Theory, Practice and Research (Draft mimeograph), Middle-School Mathematics Through Applications Project, Institute for Research on Learning and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Hiebert, J. (ed.): 1986, Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P.: 1986, ‘Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis’, in Hiebert (1986, pp. 1–27).
Jeffery, J. R.: 1990, ‘Design Methods in CDT’, Journal of Art and Design Education 9(1), 57–70.
Johnson, S. D.: 1994a, ‘Research on Problem Solving: What Works, What Doesn’t’, The Technology Teacher 53(8), 27–29, 36.
Johnson, S. D.: 1994b, ‘Implications of Cognitive Science for Technological Problem Solving’, in Blandow & Dyrenfurth (eds.), Technology Education in School and Industry: Emerging Didactics for Human Resource Development, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 157–177.
Johnson, S. D. & Thomas, R. G.: 1994, ‘Implications of Cognitive Science for Instructional Design in Technology Education’, Journal of Technology Studies 20(1), 33–45.
Kimbell, R.: 1994, ‘Tasks in Technology’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(3), 241–256.
Kimbell, R., Stables, K. & Green, R.: 1996, Understanding Practice in Design and Technology, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Lave, J.: 1988, Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lave, J.: 1992, ‘Word Problems: A Microcosm of Theories of Learning’, in P. Light and G. Butterworth (eds.), Context and Cognition: Ways Of Learning And Knowing, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 74–92.
Layton, D.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Praxis: The Relationship of School Science to Practical Action’, Studies in Science Education 19, 43–56.
Martinand, J.-L.: 1992, Enseignement et apprentissage de la modélisation en sciences, Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique, Paris.
McCormick, R.: 1993, ‘The Evolution of Current Practice in Technology Education — Part 2: Issues’, Journal of Technology Studies 19(1), 26–32.
McCormick, R.: 1994, ‘Learning through Apprenticeship’, in D. Blandow & M. J. Dyrenfurth (eds.), Technology Education in School and Industry: Emerging Didactics for Human Resource Development, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 16–36.
McCormick, R. & Davidson, M.: 1995, ‘Problem Solving and the Tyranny of Product Outcomes’, Journal of Design and Technology Education 1(3), 230–241.
McCormick, R. Davidson, M. & Levinson, R.: 1995, ‘Making Connections: Students Using Science Understanding of Electric Circuits In Design And Technology’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER 95 — International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, 63–67.
McCormick, R. & Murphy, P.: 1994, Learning the Processes in Technology. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Oxford University, England, September.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Davidson, M.: 1994, ‘Design and Technology as Revelation and Ritual’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER 94 — International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, 38–42.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Hennessy, S.: 1994, ‘Problem-solving Processes in Technology Education: A Pilot Study’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 5–34.
Millar, R.: 1988, ‘The Pursuit of the Impossible’, Physics Education 23(3), 156–159.
Millar, R. & Driver, R.: 1987, ‘Beyond Processes’, Studies in Science Education 14, 33–62.
Millar, R., Lubben, F., Gott, R. & Duggan, S.: 1994, ‘Investigating in the School Science Laboratory: Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge and their Influence on Performance’, Research Papers in Education 9(2), 207–248.
Murphy, P.: 1994, ‘Teaching the Processes in Science: Lessons for Technology Education.’ Paper presented to British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 8–11 September, Oxford.
Murphy, P., Hennessy, S., McCormick, R. & Davidson, M.: 1995, The Nature of Problem Solving in Technology Education. Paper presented to the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Bath, England, 14–17 September.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A.: 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs., NJ.
Plant, M.: 1994, ‘How is Science Useful to Technology?’ in R. McCormick & F. Banks (eds.), Design and Technology in the Secondary Curriculum: A Book of Readings, The Open University, Milton Keynes, 96–108.
Pòlya, G.: 1957, How To Solve It (Second edition), Anchor Books, New York.
Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.
Savage, E. & Sterry, L. (eds.): 1990, A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education, International Technology Education Association, Reston, V.A.
Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1985, Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic Press, Orlando.
Screen, P.: 1988, ‘A Case for a Process Approach: The Warwick Experience’, Physics Education 23(3), 146–149.
Scribner, S.: 1985, ‘Knowledge at Work’, Anthropology & Education Quarterly 16(3), 199–206.
Stables, K.: 1995, ‘Discontinuity in Transition: Pupils’ Experience of Technology in Year 6 and Year 7’, International journal of Technology and Design Education 5(2), 157–169.
Staudenmaier, J. M.: 1985, Technologies Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Stevenson, J.: 1994, ‘Vocational Expertise’, in J. Stevenson (ed.), Cognition at Work, National Centre for Vocational Education Research, Leabrook, South Australia, 7–35.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1995, Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, Falmer Press, London.
Waetjen, W. B.: 1993, ‘Entropy and Technological Learning: A Cognitive Approach’, The Journal of Technological Studies 19(2), 29–40.
Watts, M.: 1991, The Science of Problem Solving, Cassell/Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
Wellington, J.: 1988, ‘Process and Content in Physics Education’, Physics Education 23(3), 150–155.
Wellington, J. (ed.): 1989, Skills and Processes in Science Education: A Critical Analysis, Routledge, London.
Woolnough, B.: 1988, ‘Whither Process in Science Teaching?’, Physics Education 23(3), 139–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge. In: De Vries, M.J., Tamir, A. (eds) Shaping Concepts of Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5598-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5598-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6361-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5598-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive