Skip to main content
  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

Berlin’s governmental status and structure during the postwar years, particularly since the Soviet withdrawal from the Kommandatura in mid-1948 and the split in the government of the metropolis, thus has been one of the most unusual and complex in modern times. It is comprised of variegated layers of authority — both German and Allied — ranging from the central metropolitan government to the Bezirke, from the multilateral Allied Kommandatura to the unilateral Allied sectoral administrations. In addition, the governance of Berlin has been vitally affected by the jurisdiction and activities of the West German Federal Republic and the Communist-controlled East German Government, as well as by the former quadripartite Allied Control Council, the tripartite Allied High Commission for Germany, and the unilateral Soviet Control Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See the article on “Who Has Berlin Has Germany,” by Sebastian Haffner, in Berliner Illustrirte (1961), pp. 173-177. Various aspects of the problem are discussed in American Enterprise Association, Special Analysis: The Berlin Crisis, 3 parts (Washington, D.C., 1961); David Heller and Deane Heller, The Berlin Crisis (Derby, Conn., 1961); John Mander, Berlin: Hostage for the West (Baltimore, 1962); Avrahm G. Mezerik (ed.), The Berlin Crisis (New York, 1959); Otto-Suhr-Institut, Berlin: Brennpunkt deutschen Schicksals (Berlin, 1960); Charles B. Robson (ed.), Berlin: Pivot of German Destiny (Chapel Hill, N. Carolina, 1960); Klaus P. Schulz, Berlin zwischen Freiheit und Diktatur (Berlin, 1961); Hans Speier, Divided Berlin: The Anatomy of Soviet Political Blackmail (New York, 1961) and The Soviet Threat to Berlin (Santa Monica, Calif., 1960); Department of State, Berlin: 1961 (Washington, D.C., 1961) and Berlin: City Between Two Worlds (Washington, D.C., 1952 and 1960); and others listed in the bilbiography below.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Enterprise Association, op. cit., Part 1, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berlin and the German Question, Arbeiterkreis für Ostfragen (Munich, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Enterprise Association, op. cit., p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. President Kennedy’s report to the nation, July 25, 1961, in United States Senate, Documents on Germany, 1944–1961, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. (Washington, D.C., 1961), p. 695.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., pp. 681-687.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plischke, E. (1963). Concluding Statement. In: Government and Politics of Contemporary Berlin. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9135-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9135-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8424-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9135-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics