Skip to main content

Compensating Victims of Occupational Diseases: Can We Structure an Effective Policy?

  • Chapter
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Pricing

Abstract

Workers afflicted with occupational injury or disease are compensated for their losses in a variety of ways. The mechanism that is most often considered is workers’ compensation insurance which, under suitable conditions, provides compensation for such losses without regard to fault on the part of the employer. Workers may also be compensated through the existence of wage differentials related to the anticipated losses or to the portion of those losses not properly compensated from other sources. In addition, victims of occupational injury or disease may obtain compensation through the tort system if the cause of injury or disease is a product whose producer has failed to provide it in a safe form or with suitable warnings regarding the dangers involved in its use. Other sources of compensation include private disability insurance, private health and accident insurance, and payments under public programs such as Social Security. This paper discusses the problems associated with structuring a reasonable system of compensation for occupational disease in a context in which various sources of compensation exist.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley, 1951. Arrow, K.J. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham, 1971. Barth, P.S. “A Proposal for Dealing with the Compensation of Occupational

    Google Scholar 

  • Disease.“ Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1984): 569–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beclacke, M. “Asbestos Related Diseases of the Lung and Other Organs.” American Review of Respiratory Diseases 187 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, W.., and D.W. Robinson. Hearing and Noise in Industry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzon, P.M. “Tort Reform and the Role of Government in Private Insurance Markets.” Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1984): 517–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R.A. “The Legal and Insurance Dynamics of Mass Tort Litigation.” Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1984): 475–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J., and J. Riley. “The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information: An Expository Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 17 (1979): 1375–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. “The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation.” American Economic Review 68 (1973): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakalik, J.S., P.A. Ebener, W. L. F. Felstiner, and M.G. Shanley. The Cost of Asbestos Litigation. Institute for Civil Justice, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. M., and R. A. Posner. “Tort Law as a Regulatory Regime for Catastrophic Injuries.” Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1984): 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacAvoy, P., J. Karr, and P. Wilson. “The Economic Consequences of Asbestos-Related Diseases.” Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W. “The Economics of Producer Safety.” Bell Journal of Economics 4 (1973): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinfeld, D. L. “On Determining the Optimal Magnitude and Length of Liability in Torts.” Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1984): 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, H. “A Theoretical Model of Medical Malpractice and the Quality of Care.” Journal of Economics and Business 35 (1983): 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selikoff, I.J. “Disability Compensation for Asbestos-Associated Disease in the

    Google Scholar 

  • United States.“ Report to the U.S. Dept. of Labor, Environmental Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, 1981. Tobias, A. The Invisible Bankers. New York: Washington Square Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. Risk By Choice: Regulating Health and Safety in the Workplace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. “Structuring an Effective Occupational Disease Policy: Victim Compensation and Risk Regulation.” Yale Journal on Regulation 2 (1984): 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. A., and R. M. Heins. Risk Management and Insurance. 5th edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schlesinger, H., Venezian, E.C. (1988). Compensating Victims of Occupational Diseases: Can We Structure an Effective Policy?. In: Borba, P.S., Appel, D. (eds) Workers’ Compensation Insurance Pricing. Huebner International Series on Risk, Insurance, and Economic Security, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7789-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7789-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5816-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7789-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics