Abstract
This paper will describe in detail one approach to understanding an important—and little-studied-aspect of the psychology of science: how the possibility of error affects scientific reasoning. Campbell (In Press) has summarized most of the major psychological attempts to understand science. The approach used here will fall under the general rubric of cognitive psychology of science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barker, P. (1986) The reflexivity problem in the psychology of science. Paper presented to the Psychology of Science Conference, Peabody Hotel, Memphis, April 17-18.
Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956) A study of Thinking. New York: John Wiley.
Campbell, D.T. (In Press). Fragments of the fragile history of psychological epistemology and theory of science. To appear in B. Gholson, W.R. Shadish, R.A. Neimeyer, & A.C. Houts (Eds.), Psychology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Evans, J. St, B.T. (1983) Selective processes in reasoning. In Evans (Ed.) Thinking and reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 135–163.
Gorman, Michael E. (1987) Can experiments be used to study experimental science? Paper presented to the Society for Social Studies of Science, November 22.
Gorman, Michael E. (1987a) Will the next Kepler be a computer? Science & Technology Studies, 5, 63–5.
Gorman, Michael E. (1986a). A framework for understanding the cognitive style of inventors. Paper presented to the Society for the History of Technology, October 24.
Gorman, Michael E. (1986). How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 85–96.
Gorman, Michael E. & Gorman, Margaret E. (1984) A comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and a control strategy on Wason’s 2,4,6 task. 36A, 629-648.
Gorman, Michael E., Gorman, Margaret E., Latta, R.M. and Cunningham, G. (1984) How disconfirmatory, confirmatory and combined strategies affect group problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 65–79.
Gorman, Michael E., Stafford, A. & Gorman, Margaret E. (1987) Disconfirmation and dual hypotheses on a more difficult versin of Wason’s 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 1–28.
Gruber, H.E. (1981) Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hewes, D. (1980) Stochastic modeling of communication processes. In Monge, P.R. & Cappella, J.N. (Eds.) Multivariate techniques in human communications research. N.Y.: Academic Press, 293–427.
Holton, G. (1973) Thematic origins of scientific thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keller, E.F. (1983) A feeling for the organism. New York: W.H. Freemen.
Kern, L. (1982) The effect of data error in inducing confirmatory inference strategies in scientific hypothesis testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K. (In Press) Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science.
Klayman, J. & Ha, Young-Won. (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
Lakatos, I. (1978) The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G. & Zytkow, J.M. (1987) Scientific Discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mitroff, I.I. (1974) The subjective side of science. New York: Elsevier.
Mynatt, C.R., Doherty, M.E. and Tweney, R.D. (1978) Consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation in a simulated research environment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 395–406.
Rudwick, M.J.S. (1985) The Great Devonian Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Steiner, I.D. (1976) Task-performing groups. In J.W. Thibaut, J.T. Spence and R.D. Carson (Eds.) Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
Tweney, R.D. (1985) Faraday’s discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In d. Gooding and F. James (Eds.) Faraday rediscovered: Essays on the life and work of Michael Faraday, 1791–1867. New York: Stockton Press.
Tweney, R.D., Doherty, M.E., Worner, W.J., Pliske, D.B., Mynatt, C.R., Gross, K.A. & Arkkelin, D.L. (1980) Strategies of rule discovery on an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 109–123.
Tweney, R.D. & Yachanin, S.A. (1985) Can scientists assess conditional inferences? Social Studies of Science, 15, 155–173.
Tukey, D.D. (1986) A philosophical and empirical analysis of subjects’ modes of inquiry on the 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 5–33.
Van Lear, C.A. (1985) Analysis of interaction data. In Bostrum, R.N. (Ed.) Communication Yearbook VII. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 282–303.
Walker, B.J., Doherty, M.E. & Tweney, R.D. Unpublished Manuscript. The effect of system failure error on hypothesis testing.
Wason, P.C. (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. (1960). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.
Wason, P.C. (1962) Reply to Wetherick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 250.
Wethernick, N.E. (1962) Eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 246–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gorman, M.E. (1989). Error and Scientific Reasoning: An Experimental Inquiry. In: Fuller, S., de Mey, M., Shinn, T., Woolgar, S. (eds) The Cognitive Turn. Sociology of the Sciences a Yearbook, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7825-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7825-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4049-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7825-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive