Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Informed Consent

Part of the book series: Clinical Medical Ethics ((CMET,volume 4))

  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

The first issue a book on informed consent should address regards why it was written at all. Of all the current pressing topics in biomedical ethics, from abortion, to the controversies surrounding access to scarce and expensive health care, to the myriad dilemmas ingredient in the area of death and dying, informed consent seems to pale in comparison as an issue. Equally, it would seem that agreement has long since been reached on the ethical necessity for the informed consent of competent patients, indicating that this is no longer a controversial issue. Finally, at least from the perspective of practicing clinicians, the intended audience of this series, the most that is needed is an explanation of the law on informed consent, particularly regarding how to honor its requirements at the bedside. But such “cookbook” approaches to informed consent have been offered.1 Another one is hardly needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The most detailed of such offerings is Rozovsky, 1984. It provides both conceptual analysis of legal principles as well as guidance regarding specific modalities and consent situations.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Regarding the issue of the use of the singular indefinite pronoun, I will follow the lead of my predecessor in this series, E. Haavi Morreim, who states: “Throughout this volume I will observe the somewhat old-fashioned but still correct custom of using the masculine pronoun in its gender-neutral form to stand as the singular indefinite pronoun (see Shertzer, 1986, p. 20). To substitute plural pronouns such as ‘they’ and ‘their’ is incorrect; consistently using the feminine pronoun instead of the masculine is no less ‘biased’; and alternating between the two seems awkward and contrived. Therefore, although the masculine form is used, no gender bias is intended.” Morreim, 1991, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wear, S. (1993). Introduction. In: Informed Consent. Clinical Medical Ethics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8122-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8122-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4219-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8122-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics